1.Application of pediatric donation after brain death donors during split liver transplantation :an analysis of 8 cases
Zhuolun SONG ; Nan MA ; Chong DONG ; Xingchu MENG ; Chao SUN ; Hong QIN ; Chao HAN ; Yang YANG ; Fubo ZHANG ; Weiping ZHENG ; Wei GAO
Chinese Journal of Organ Transplantation 2019;40(7):387-391
Objective To evaluate the feasibility and safety of using pediatric donation after brain death donors during split liver transplantation .Methods The clinical data were retrospectively reviewed for 8 pediatric recipients undergoing split liver transplantation with a donor age of 2 .7-7 years .The clinical characteristics of donors/recipients ,perioperative course ,postoperative recovery and complications along with graft and recipient survival rate were analyzed .Results The split procedure was performed ex situ (n=3) and in situ (n=1) ,all liver grafts were split into left lateral lobes and extended right lobes . The recipients were children aged 4 .7-105 .5 months . The mean follow-up period was (8 .1 ± 0 .6) months and the graft/recipient survival rates approached 100% . Graft functions remained normal in all recipients at the end of follow-ups .Two recipients undergoing liver grafting with long cold ischemia time exhibited slower recovery of graft function .Pathological examination of graft biopsy indicated ischemic and hypoxic changes .Portal vein stenosis occurred in one recipient .Percutaneous transhepatic portal vein balloon dilatation was performed and the recipient recovered well .Cytomegalovirus infection occurred in 5/8 recipients and serum virological marker returned to normal after ganciclovir therapy . The youngest donor age was 2 .7 years and both recipients of donor liver recovered well .Conclusions Split liver transplantation with a donor age of 2 .7-7 .0 years may achieve ideal clinical outcomes in well-matched donors and recipients .
2.Efficacy of short-course ganciclovir in preventing cytomegalovirus infection after pediatric liver transplantation
Tao CUI ; Chong DONG ; Chao SUN ; Kai WANG ; Hong QIN ; Chao HAN ; Yang YANG ; Fubo ZHANG ; Zhuolun SONG ; Weiping ZHENG ; Wei GAO
Chinese Journal of Organ Transplantation 2020;41(9):534-538
Objective:To explore the preventive efficacy of 2-week ganciclovir intravenous injection for CMV infection after pediatric liver transplantation(LT).Methods:Clinical data were retrospectively analyzed for 404 pediatric LT recipients from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017. According to whether or not ganciclovir was intravenously administered for preventing CMV infection, they were divided into two groups of prevention(235 cases)and non-prevention(169 cases). The preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative follow-up data of two groups were recorded. Survival rate, incidence of CMV infection and time of initial CMV infection were compared between two groups.Results:The median follow-up time of 404 pediatric liver transplantation recipients was 856 days and the incidence of CMV infection 39.1%. No inter-group statistical difference existed in such basic clinical data as gender, age, primary disease, preoperative PELD score, CHILD grade, operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, immunosuppressive regimen or rejection rate. The median follow-up time of two groups was 1014 and 731 days; The incidence of CMV infection 37.4%(88/235)and 41.4%(70/169); The average postoperative time of initial CMV infection 75.5 and 110.2 days; The rate of CMV re-infection after initial CMV infection 26.1%(23/88)and 18.6%(13/70)respectively. No significant inter-group differences existed( P>0.05). Conclusions:Early postoperative 2-week intravenous ganciclovir injection fails to reduce the incidence of CMV infection after pediatric LT, nor delay the occurrence time of CMV infection. It is not recommended as a preventive program for CMV infection after pediatric LT.
3.Analysis of the clinical factors related to fibrosis after pediatric liver transplantation
Zhixin ZHANG ; Chong DONG ; Chao SUN ; Weiping ZHENG ; Kai WANG ; Hong QIN ; Chao HAN ; Fubo ZHANG ; Yang YANG ; Min XU ; Shunqi CAO ; Zhuolun SONG ; Tao CUI ; Wei GAO ; Zhongyang SHEN
Chinese Journal of Organ Transplantation 2021;42(2):91-95
Objective:To explore the clinicalfactors related to allograft fibrosis after pediatric liver transplantation.Methods:The clinical data were respectively analyzed for 94 pediatric recipients from January 2013 to December 2016 at Tianjin First Central Hospital.The Patients were assigned into fibrotic and non-fibrotic groups based upon the results of protocol liver biopsies. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses were performed for examining the risk factors of fibrosis after pediatric livertransplantation. Then Logistic regression model was established to obtain the predicted value of combined predictive factors.Thereceiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was conducted to evaluate the predictive value of combined predictive factors.Results:A total number of 54(57.5%) patients occurred fibrosis among the 94 patients. There weresignificant differences in cold ischemia time (Z=2.094), warm ischemia time (Z=2.421), biliary stricture( χ2=4.560), drug-induced liver injury ( χ2=7.389), hepatic artery thrombosis and rejection ( χ2=6.955)between two groups ( P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that cold ischemia time (OR=1.003, 95%CI: 1.000~1.007, P=0.044), biliary stricture(OR=6.451, 95%CI: 1.205~33.295), rejection(OR=2.735, 95%CI: 1.057~7.077)and drug-induced liver injury (OR=4.977, 95%CI: 1.207~20.522, P=0.026) were independent risk factors for fibrosis 5 years after liver transplantation. The area under the ROC curve was 0.786(95%CI: 0.691~0.881), for predicting patient outcome.If using 0.311as a cutoff Value, the sensitivity was 90.70%, and the specificity was 60.00%. However, through the ROC curve comparison, there was statistical significance between combined predictive factors and the other independent risk factors ( P>0.05). Conclusions:The incidence of fibrosis 5 years after pediatricliver transplantation is 57.5%. Prolonged cold ischemia time, biliarystricture, rejectionand drug-induced liver injury after liver transplantation are independent risk factors for fibrosis 5 years after pediatric liver transplantation.And the combined predictive factors have a high predictive value forallograftfibrosis.
4.Clinical study of causes and outcomes in pediatric liver retransplantation
Chao SUN ; Chong DONG ; Xingchu MENG ; Kai WANG ; Hong QIN ; Chao HAN ; Yang YANG ; Fubo ZHANG ; Weiping ZHENG ; Zhuolun SONG ; Haohao LI ; Wei GAO ; Zhongyang SHEN
Chinese Journal of Surgery 2021;59(5):353-358
Objective:To investigate the etiology,clinical features and prognosis of pediatric liver retransplantation.Methods:The data of 1 024 cases of pediatric liver transplantation (<18 years old) from January 2014 to December 2019 operated at Tianjin First Central Hospital were collected,retrospectively. Retransplantation was performed in 26 cases,among which 25 cases received secondary liver transplantation and 1 case received a third liver transplantation. There were 13 male and 12 female patients among the 25 patients. The median age was 12.9(20.5) months(range: 5.8 to 134.8 months), the body weight was 8.0(5.6) kg(range: 5.0 to 30.0 kg) at the time of retransplantation. The pediatric end-stage liver disease(PELD) score was 17.0(21.3) (range: 0 to 45) before retransplantation. The etiology of retransplantation was biliary complications in 7 cases,primary nonfunction of liver graft in 5 cases,antibody-mediated rejection in 4 cases,hepatic artery thrombosis in 3 cases,portal vein thrombosis in 3 cases,concomitant hepatic artery and portal vein thrombosis in 2 cases,thrombogenesis of inferior Vena Cava in 1 case and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome in 1 case. The patients were divided into two groups according to the time interval(30 days) between two liver transplantations,8 patients were classified into early-retransplantation(≤30 days) group and 18 patients were classified into late-retransplantation (>30 days) group. The etiology of liver retransplantation,pre-transplant score,time interval between two transplantations,surgical aspects,major complications and survival rates were compared between the two groups. Continuous variables with normal distribution were compared with t test,while Mann-Whitney U test was applied to compare variables without normal distribution. Categorical variables were compared with chi-square test. The survival curves were created by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by Log Rank test. Results:The median follow-up time was 26.8(30.2) months(range: 1 day to 85.7 months), and the incidence of retransplantation was 1.9%. In the early-retransplantation group,the duration of surgery was (439.8±151.0)minutes,the graft-to-recipient weight ratio was 5.0(1.8)%(range:3.6% to 6.1%),the main cause for retransplantation were primary nonfunction and vascular complications. In the late-retransplantation group,the duration of surgery was (604.4±158.0)minutes,the graft-to-recipient weight ratio was 3.4(2.1)%(range:1.4% to 5.3%),the main cause for retransplantation were biliary complications,antibody mediated rejection and vascular complications.The 3-month,1-year and 2-year recipient survival rates in the early-retransplantation group were all 62.3%,while the recipient survival rates in the late-retransplantation group were 100%,93.8% and 93.8%,respectively. The difference of recipient survival rates was significant between the early-retransplantation group and the late-retransplantation group( P=0.019). The overall 3-month,1-year and 3-year recipient survival rates after the primary liver transplantation were 97.1%,95.4%,94.1%,respectively. Conclusions:The vascular complications,biliary complications,primary nonfunction and antibody-mediated rejection are the main causes of liver retransplantation.The PELD score is higher in patients receiving early retransplantation,while the surgery is relatively more complex in patients receiving late retransplantation,which is reflected by longer duration of surgeries. Patients in the late-retransplantation group showed similar recipient survival rates with primary liver transplantation recipients,and the survival rates are superior to those of patients in the early-retransplantation group. Infection and multiple organ failure are the most common fatal causes after retransplantation.
5.Clinical study of causes and outcomes in pediatric liver retransplantation
Chao SUN ; Chong DONG ; Xingchu MENG ; Kai WANG ; Hong QIN ; Chao HAN ; Yang YANG ; Fubo ZHANG ; Weiping ZHENG ; Zhuolun SONG ; Haohao LI ; Wei GAO ; Zhongyang SHEN
Chinese Journal of Surgery 2021;59(5):353-358
Objective:To investigate the etiology,clinical features and prognosis of pediatric liver retransplantation.Methods:The data of 1 024 cases of pediatric liver transplantation (<18 years old) from January 2014 to December 2019 operated at Tianjin First Central Hospital were collected,retrospectively. Retransplantation was performed in 26 cases,among which 25 cases received secondary liver transplantation and 1 case received a third liver transplantation. There were 13 male and 12 female patients among the 25 patients. The median age was 12.9(20.5) months(range: 5.8 to 134.8 months), the body weight was 8.0(5.6) kg(range: 5.0 to 30.0 kg) at the time of retransplantation. The pediatric end-stage liver disease(PELD) score was 17.0(21.3) (range: 0 to 45) before retransplantation. The etiology of retransplantation was biliary complications in 7 cases,primary nonfunction of liver graft in 5 cases,antibody-mediated rejection in 4 cases,hepatic artery thrombosis in 3 cases,portal vein thrombosis in 3 cases,concomitant hepatic artery and portal vein thrombosis in 2 cases,thrombogenesis of inferior Vena Cava in 1 case and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome in 1 case. The patients were divided into two groups according to the time interval(30 days) between two liver transplantations,8 patients were classified into early-retransplantation(≤30 days) group and 18 patients were classified into late-retransplantation (>30 days) group. The etiology of liver retransplantation,pre-transplant score,time interval between two transplantations,surgical aspects,major complications and survival rates were compared between the two groups. Continuous variables with normal distribution were compared with t test,while Mann-Whitney U test was applied to compare variables without normal distribution. Categorical variables were compared with chi-square test. The survival curves were created by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by Log Rank test. Results:The median follow-up time was 26.8(30.2) months(range: 1 day to 85.7 months), and the incidence of retransplantation was 1.9%. In the early-retransplantation group,the duration of surgery was (439.8±151.0)minutes,the graft-to-recipient weight ratio was 5.0(1.8)%(range:3.6% to 6.1%),the main cause for retransplantation were primary nonfunction and vascular complications. In the late-retransplantation group,the duration of surgery was (604.4±158.0)minutes,the graft-to-recipient weight ratio was 3.4(2.1)%(range:1.4% to 5.3%),the main cause for retransplantation were biliary complications,antibody mediated rejection and vascular complications.The 3-month,1-year and 2-year recipient survival rates in the early-retransplantation group were all 62.3%,while the recipient survival rates in the late-retransplantation group were 100%,93.8% and 93.8%,respectively. The difference of recipient survival rates was significant between the early-retransplantation group and the late-retransplantation group( P=0.019). The overall 3-month,1-year and 3-year recipient survival rates after the primary liver transplantation were 97.1%,95.4%,94.1%,respectively. Conclusions:The vascular complications,biliary complications,primary nonfunction and antibody-mediated rejection are the main causes of liver retransplantation.The PELD score is higher in patients receiving early retransplantation,while the surgery is relatively more complex in patients receiving late retransplantation,which is reflected by longer duration of surgeries. Patients in the late-retransplantation group showed similar recipient survival rates with primary liver transplantation recipients,and the survival rates are superior to those of patients in the early-retransplantation group. Infection and multiple organ failure are the most common fatal causes after retransplantation.
6.Living donor liver transplantations for pediatric patients withbiliary atresia in a single center: 306
Wei GAO ; Kai WANG ; Nan MA ; Chong DONG ; Chao SUN ; Xingchu MENG ; Wei ZHANG ; Bin WU ; Hong QIN ; Chao HAN ; Yang YANG ; Zhuolun SONG ; Zhongyang SHEN
Chinese Journal of Organ Transplantation 2019;40(1):13-17
Objective To analyze the clinical efficacy and prognosis of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in children with biliary atresia (BA).Methods The clinical data of 306 cases of BA patients who received LDLT from June 2013 to December 2017 in the Department of Pediatric Liver Transplantation of Tianjin First Center Hospital were retrospectively analyzed.The incidence of post-LDLT complications was summarized and different factors influencing long-term survival of the recipients were analyzed.Results The median age of recipients at transplantation was 7 (6,9) months,and 88.9% of the recipients received left lateral lobes.The surgical-related complications mainly included lymphatic leakage (30.7%),bile duct stricture (7.8%) and portal vein stenosis (6.9%).The non-surgical-related complications were mainly EBV infection (57.8%) and CMV infection (36.6%).The incidence of pulmonary infection and acute rejection was 18.6% and 13.7%,respectively.The 1-,3-,and 5-year survival rates of recipients and grafts were 97.2%,97.2%,97.2% and 97.2%,96.4%,and 94.6%,respectively.A total number of 8 patients died after LDLT,mainly due to the complications of cardio-pulmonary system.Two patients underwent retransplantation due to graft dysfunction caused by antibody-mediated rejection.Recipient age,PELD scores,GRWR,previous surgical history and matching of ABO blood group between donors and recipients did not affect the long-term survival rates of recipients (P>0.05).Conclusions Children with biliary atresia who received LDLT can obtain satisfactory clinical results.