Objective To study the changes of eotaxin expression during different phrases of recovery process of mucosa in sinus cavity after endoscopic sinus surgery. Methods Expression of eotaxin during different phrases of recovery process of mucosa in sinus cavity in 10 patients with type Ⅰ and type Ⅱ chronic sinusitis after endoscopic sinus surgery was determined by immunohistochemitry and Western blotting. Results At 1-2 weeks after surgery, there was a significant difference in expression of eotaxin (P

Objective:To investigate the efficacy of intratympanic injection versus intravenous drip of prednisolone acetate in the treatment of sudden hearing loss. Methods:A total of 120 patients with sudden hearing loss who received treatment in the Department of Otolaryngology, Mingzhou Hospital between January 2017 and January 2020 were included in this study. They were divided into intratympanic injection group (intratympanic injection of prednisolone acetate, n = 60) and intravenous injection group (intravenous injection of prednisolone acetate, n = 60) according to route of drug administration. After 8 days of treatment, clinical efficacy was compared between the two groups. The hearing thresholds at 500 Hz and 1 000 Hz in both groups were detected using pure tone audiometry. The levels of procalcitonin and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and adverse drug reactions were compared between the two groups. Results:After treatment, total response rate in the intratympanic injection group was significantly higher than that in the intravenous injection group (93.33% vs. 80.00%, χ2 = 4.61, P < 0.05). The hearing threshold at 500 Hz in the intratympanic injection group was significantly lower than that in the intravenous injection group [(38.69 ± 3.56) vs. (42.36 ± 4.36), t = 5.05, P < 0.001). The hearing threshold at 1 000 Hz in the intratympanic injection group was significantly lower than that in the intravenous injection group [(32.36 ± 3.36) vs. (40.15 ± 4.12), t = 11.35, P < 0.001). After treatment, procalcitonin level in the intratympanic injection group was significantly lower than that in the intravenous injection group [(0.65 ± 0.12) μg/L vs. (0.98 ± 0.15) μg/L, t = 13.30, P < 0.001)]. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein level in the intratympanic injection group was significantly lower than that in the intravenous injection group [(3.28 ± 0.36) mg/L vs. (5.26 ± 0.56) mg/L, t = 23.03, P < 0.001]. There was no significant difference in incidence of adverse reactions between intratympanic injection and intravenous injection groups (8.33% vs. 10.00%, χ2 = 0.10, P > 0.05). Conclusion:Compared with intravenous drip of prednisolone acetate, intratympanic injection of prednisolone acetate can improve the clinical symptoms of patients with sudden hearing loss and enhance clinical efficacy.