1.Quality Administration in Disinfection Supplier Centre and Its Role in Control of Cross Infection
Zhuhua WANG ; Zhuxia ZHOU ; Xiaogan CAI
Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology 2009;0(23):-
OBJECTIVE To diminish and discontinue intra-hospital cross infection in Disinfection Supplier Centre.METHODS The administration of personal resources control was developed,the equipment and systemic control of aseptic process and isolation was reasonably arranged,and the quality control was enhanced.We executed the routine seriously during our daily work,and gave strict measures during quality management such as disposal,classification,washing,disinfection,packaging,sterilization,monitoring,stockpile,and handout.RESULTS Every criterion of aseptic and isolation work were all adapted to the demanding set up by Ministry of Health referred to hospital infection control quality standard,The infection control in our Centre was standardized and regular scientific channel was set up.CONCLUSIONS Quality administration care can play a main and key role in the control of cross hospital infection in Disinfection Supplier Centre.
2.Clinical value of hysteroscopy in diagnosis of postmenopausal uterine bleeding
Qiuxia XIA ; Shenghua PAN ; Zhuhua CAI ; Huamei CAO
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy 2010;17(11):1490-1491
Objective To investigate the value of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of postmenopausal uterine bleeding.Methods 106 cases of outpatient of postmenopausal bleeding were analyzed.Hysteroscopic diagnosis and the biopsy result were compared in all patients.Results Histological diagnosis was 73 cases of uterine cavity abnormality,33 cases of normal were diagnosed in hysteroscopy.78 cases of pathological abnormalities,and 28 cases of normal were diagnosed.Comparing to histology, sensitivity was 95.89% ,specificity 84.85% , positive predictive value 93.33% , negative predictive value of 90.32%.Conclusion Hysteroscopy combined pathology was the best method to diagnose postmenopausal uterus bleeding.
3.Efficiency of second trimester screenings for Down syndrome using alpha-fetoprotein and β-human chorionic gonadotropin duplex in 32 188 cases in south Zhejiang
Zhuhua CAI ; Ge ZHENG ; Wenxia CAI ; Ligui JIN ; Huanhuan JIN ; Yuehong LIN ; Shuchun ZHOU ; Jie DAI ; Huamei CAO
Chinese Journal of Perinatal Medicine 2011;14(12):716-719
Objective To evaluate the efficiency of second trimester screenings for Down syndrome using alpha-fetoprotein and β-human chorionic gonadotropin duplex.MethodsPregnant women of south Zhejiang were screened for Down syndrome fetuses by maternal alpha-fetoprotein and β-human chorionic gonadotropin duplex during second trimester.The high-risk women underwent prenatal diagnosis by amniocentesis,cell culture and chromosome analysis.The newborns followed up by the maternal and child tertiary health care network and suspected to have Down syndrome were diagnosed by peripheral blood chromosome analysis.Statistical analysis was performed using two-sample t test and x2 test.Risk probability of Down Syndrome was calculated by random screening software. Results From Oct.2007 to May 2009,1130 of 32 188 singleton pregnant women in second trimester received prenatal screening were discovered with high risk(≥1 ∶ 270).Prenatal diagnosis was performed in 90.79% cases (1026/1130) of high risk women and seven fetuses were diagnosed as Down syndrome by amniotic fluid chromosome analysis,and the pregnancies were terminated.Among the other 104 cases without prenatal diagnosis one Down syndrome baby was delivered.Six of 31 058 pregnancy women with low risk delivered Down syndrome babies with the incidence of Down syndrome of 0.19‰ (6/31 058).Detection rate of second trimester screenings for Down syndrome using alpha-fetoprotein and β-human chorionic gonadotropin duplex was 57.14%(8/14).False positive rate was 3.48% (1122/32 188).Positive predictive value was 7.08‰(8/1130).During the same period,there were 23 813 pregnant women who didn't receive screening and 15 fetuses with Down syndrome were diagnosed after birth.There was no statistical difference in the prevalence rate of Down syndrome between those pregnant women who received prenatal screening or not [0.43‰ (14/32 188) vs 0.63‰ (15/23 813),x2 =1.004,P>0.05].The prevalence of Down syndrome was 0.52‰ (29/56 001) in this area. ConclusionsThe prenatal screening and diagnosis could reduce the birth rate of Down syndrome patients.However,detection rate,false positive rate and positive predictive value of which were lower than reports in other studies.It's possible that the reference data might be not suitable for Chinese.