OBJECTIVETo investigate the methylation in promtor region of RASSF2 and sFRP1 in sporadic colorectal cancer patients in order to provide screening method for early colorectal cancer.

METHODSThe methylation in promoter region of RASSF2 and sFRP1 in serum samples of 59 sporadic colorectal cancer patients and 59 healthy volunteers was detected by methylation specific PCR. The association between clinicopathological features of sporadic colorectal cancer patients and methylation in promoter region of RASSF2 and sFRP1 was analyzed.

RESULTSThe methylation rates of RASSF2 and sFRP1 gene in serum of 59 sporadic colorectal cancer patients were 27.1% and 30.5%, significantly higher than those in healthy volunteers(0%, both P<0.01). The methylation of RASSF2 or sFRP1 occurred in 29(49.2%) patients, which was significantly higer than the methylation rate of single gene(P<0.05). No association was found between methylation ratio of RASSF2 and sFRP1 and clinicopathological features in sporadic colorectal cancer patients.

CONCLUSIONSMethylation in promoter region of RASSF2 and sFRP1 is often detected in serum of colorectal cancer patients. The combination detection of methylation for the two genes may provide information for early screening of colorectal cancer.

Colorectal Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; genetics ; DNA Methylation ; Female ; Humans ; Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins ; blood ; genetics ; Male ; Membrane Proteins ; blood ; genetics ; Middle Aged ; Promoter Regions, Genetic ; Tumor Suppressor Proteins ; blood ; genetics

Objective:To investigate the application value of porcine small intestinal sub-mucosa (SIS) acellular matrix mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR).Methods:The prospective multicenter randomized controlled single-blind non-inferiority-type study was conducted. The clinical data of 216 patients who underwent LIHR in 4 medical centers, including Beijing Chaoyang Hospital of Capital Medical University et al, from April 2021 to August 2022 were selected. Patients were divided into two groups using a central randomization system. Patients in the experimental group were implanted domestic SIS mesh, and patients in the control group were implanted imported mesh of similar material origin. The baseline characteristics of enrolled patients were evaluated using the full analysis set, and the effectiveness indicators were evaluated using the protocol set. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean± SD, and comparison between groups was conducted using the ttest. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M(range), and comparison between groups was conducted using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Count data were expressed as absolute numbers and/or percentages, and comparison between groups was conducted using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability. If the lower limit of 95% confidence interval( CI) of the difference in effective rates between the experimental group and the control group was greater than the non-inferiority cut-off value of ?10%, the experimental group was considered non-inferior to the control group. Results:(1) Situations of the enrolled patients. A total of 216 patients were selected for eligibility, with 46 patients dropping out due to violation of the trial protocol, and the remaining 170 patients were included in the full analysis set. Nine patients were dislodged due to loss to follow-up, and 161 patients completed follow-up. One case in the experimental group was excluded due to violating the inclusion and exclusion criteria, while the remaining 160 patients were included in the protocol set (80 cases in the experimental group and 80 cases in the control group). There was no significant difference in the gender, age, body mass index (BMI), surgical method, Gilbert type of hernia, volume of intraoperative blood loss, operation time of patients between the experimental group and the control group ( P>0.05), confounding bias ensured comparability. (2) Study endpoints. ① Primary study endpoint. During the postoperative 6 month of follow-up, none of patient in the experimental group or the control group had hernia recurrence, with the recurrence rate as 0. Results of non-inferiority test showed that the difference of hernia recurrence between the two groups was 0 (95% CI as ?4.58% to 4.58%), with the lower limit of ?4.58% greater than the non-inferiority cut-off value of ?10%, which fulfilled the non-inferiority hypothesis. ② Secondary study endpoints. Cases with plasmapheresis during the follow-up were 18 in the experimental group and 29 in the control group, respectively, showing no significant difference between the two groups ( χ2=3.65, P>0.05). There were 4 cases with postoperative pain and 1 case with postoperative malaise in the experimental group, and there were 8 cases with postoperative pain and 0 case with postoperative malaise in the control group, showing no signifi-cant difference in the above indicators between the two groups ( P>0.05). None of patient in the experimental group or the control group had incision infection, enterocutaneous fistula, intestinal obstruction, intestinal canal injury, allergy and rejection, testicular inflammation and/or atrophy, or any other complication. Conclusion:Compared with imported mesh of similar material origin, domestic porcine SIS mesh is safe and effective in LIHR.