2.Closed reduction and minimally invasive fixation for the treatment of pelvic fractures of type C2 and C3
Chengliang YANG ; Xiaodong YANG ; Jia LIU ; Yujin TANG ; Zhixiang LIU ; Qiguang MAI ; Tao LI ; Jianwen LIAO ; Shicai FAN
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics 2021;41(19):1380-1386
Objective:To explore the surgical indications, techniques and methods of closed reduction and minimally invasive fixation for the treatment of pelvic fractures of Tile C2 and C3, and evaluate the clinical efficacy.Methods:A retrospective analysis of the data of 20 cases with Tile C2 and C3 pelvic fractures treated with closed reduction and minimally invasive fixation from January 2016 to July 2019. There were 7 males and 13 female, with an average age of 35.6±14.6 years (range 12-60 years). The time from injury to operation was 5-30 d, with an average of 19.3±7.1 d. Tile classification of pelvic fracture: 13 cases of C2 type and 7 cases of C3 Type. 2 cases were complicated with ipsilateral or bilateral lumbosacral nerve injury. Classification of nerve injury: 2 cases were partial injury, British Medical Research Council (BMRC) Grade M3. The operation is treated with closed reduction and minimally invasive fixation. First, the side with obvious displacement is fixed on the operating table with a pelvic reduction frame, and the side with less displacement is traction. After reduction, insert S 1 and S 2 sacroiliac screw guide-pin on this side to the contralateral sacral fracture. And then change the traction, fix the reset side on the operating table, change the side with obvious traction displacement, after the reset is ideal, pass the inserted guide-pin through the contralateral sacroiliac joint to the outer iliactable. Then insert the sacroiliac screw. The patients complicated with acetabular fracture were reduced and fixed by the corresponding approach, and the anterior ring was fixed by INFIX. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume and postoperative complications were recorded. The quality of fracture reduction was evaluated by Matta's criteria, and the clinical effect was evaluated by Majeed score. Results:All the 20 patients successfully completed the operation. The operation time was 105-210 min, with an average of 167.00±31.21 min. The intraoperative bleeding volume was 30-100 ml, with an average of 82.00±5.36 ml. Postoperative X-ray and CT showed that the fracture was reduced and fixed. According to the Matta's criteria, the reduction quality was rated as excellent in 14 cases, good in 4 case, fair in 2 case, with an excellent and good rate of 90%. Two patients showed symptoms of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury without other complications related to surgery. Follow-up for 1 to 4 years, the fractures healed, and the healing time was 6 to 12 weeks. According to the Majeed score, the result was rated as excellent in 18 cases, good in 2 case, with an excellent and good rate of 100%.Conclusion:Closed reduction and minimally invasive fixation for the treatment of pelvic fractures of type C2 and C3, with the characteristics of less damage and good results, will become a trend in the treatment of pelvic fractures.
3.Estimation of Genome Size of Ginseng Based on Herbgenomics by Flow Cytometric Analysis And High-throughput Sequence
Xiaoyan ZHANG ; Zhixiang LIU ; Baosheng LIAO ; Shuiming XIAO ; Jiang XU ; Wei SHENG
World Science and Technology-Modernization of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2017;19(10):1724-1728
Ginseng is the dried root and rhizome of Panax ginseng.The lack of genomic data has restricted the development of ginseng industry and basic research.The genome size of P.ginseng was estimated to be 3.42 Gb by using the genome data of Oryza sativa ssp.Nipponbare and Glycine max (L.) Merrill as the reference and the flow cytometric analysis.Meanwhile,shotgun libraries with the insert size of 250 bp and 500 bp were constructed,and sequenced for double terminal PE 150 by using Illumina Hiseq X Ten platform.Totally,183.82 Gb high quality data was obtained after filtering the raw data.The genome size of P.ginseng was 3.35 Gb and the sequencing depth was 54.87 X by K-mer analysis.In this study,flow cytometry and K-mer analysis were used to identify the genome size of ginseng,which provided basic data for the further whole genome sequencing and herbgenomics studies.
4.A New Micro-traumatic Laparoscopic Surgery Robot System.
Mingxuan SU ; Jiayin WANG ; Zihan LI ; Zhongbao LUO ; Shuai YUAN ; Gong CHEN ; Zhixiang LIAO ; Chao HE
Chinese Journal of Medical Instrumentation 2019;43(3):165-169
At present, there still exist some limitations in the laparoscopic surgery robot represented by da Vinci surgical robot, such as the lack of force feedback function. Doctor can not feel the force feedback while operating. In this paper, a new minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery robot system is designed. Based on the master side surgeon's console, stereo vision subsystem and the slave side surgical cart, the multi-dimensional instrument force feedback technology and force feedback based safety protection strategy are introduced. The design realizes the force sensing function of full state operation. Besides, a number of different live pig experiments are carried out. The amount of bleeding in these experiments is relatively small compared with the data of the same kind of surgical robots, which effectively validates the force feedback and surgical safety protection strategies of the new robot system.
Animals
;
Equipment Design
;
Laparoscopy
;
instrumentation
;
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
;
Robotic Surgical Procedures
;
instrumentation
;
Robotics
;
Swine
5.BRICS report of 2018-2019: the distribution and antimicrobial resistance profile of clinical isolates from blood culture in China
Yunbo CHEN ; Jinru JI ; Chaoqun YING ; Peipei WANG ; Zhiying LIU ; Qing YANG ; Haishen KONG ; Hui DING ; Yongyun LIU ; Haifeng MAO ; Ying HUANG ; Zhenghai YANG ; Yuanyuan DAI ; Guolin LIAO ; Lisha ZHU ; Liping ZHANG ; Yanhong LI ; Hongyun XU ; Junmin CAO ; Baohua ZHANG ; Liang GUO ; Haixin DONG ; Shuyan HU ; Sijin MAN ; Lu WANG ; Zhixiang LIAO ; Rong XU ; Dan LIU ; Yan JIN ; Yizheng ZHOU ; Yiqun LIAO ; Fenghong CHEN ; Beiqing GU ; Jiliang WANG ; Jinhua LIANG ; Lin ZHENG ; Aiyun LI ; Jilu SHEN ; Yinqiao DONG ; Lixia ZHANG ; Hongxia HU ; Bo QUAN ; Wencheng ZHU ; Kunpeng LIANG ; Qiang LIU ; Shifu WANG ; Xiaoping YAN ; Jiangbang KANG ; Xiusan XIA ; Lan MA ; Li SUN ; Liang LUAN ; Jianzhong WANG ; Zhuo LI ; Dengyan QIAO ; Lin ZHANG ; Lanjuan LI ; Yonghong XIAO
Chinese Journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases 2021;14(1):32-45
Objective:To investigate the distribution and antimicrobial resistance profile of clinical bacteria isolated from blood culture in China.Methods:The clinical bacterial strains isolated from blood culture from member hospitals of Blood Bacterial Resistant Investigation Collaborative System (BRICS) were collected during January 2018 to December 2019. Antibiotic susceptibility tests were conducted with agar dilution or broth dilution methods recommended by US Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). WHONET 5.6 was used to analyze data.Results:During the study period, 14 778 bacterial strains were collected from 50 hospitals, of which 4 117 (27.9%) were Gram-positive bacteria and 10 661(72.1%) were Gram-negative bacteria. The top 10 bacterial species were Escherichia coli (37.2%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (17.0%), Staphylococcus aureus (9.7%), coagulase-negative Staphylococci (8.7%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (3.7%), Enterococcus faecium (3.4%), Acinetobacter baumannii(3.4%), Enterobacter cloacae (2.9%), Streptococci(2.8%) and Enterococcus faecalis (2.3%). The the prevalence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus were 27.4% (394/1 438) and 70.4% (905/1 285), respectively. No glycopeptide-resistant Staphylococcus was detected. More than 95% of S. aureus were sensitive to amikacin, rifampicin and SMZco. The resistance rate of E. faecium to vancomycin was 0.4% (2/504), and no vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis was detected. The ESBLs-producing rates in no carbapenem-resistance E. coli, carbapenem sensitive K. pneumoniae and Proteus were 50.4% (2 731/5 415), 24.6% (493/2001) and 35.2% (31/88), respectively. The prevalence of carbapenem-resistance in E. coli and K. pneumoniae were 1.5% (85/5 500), 20.6% (518/2 519), respectively. 8.3% (27/325) of carbapenem-resistance K. pneumoniae was resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam combination. The resistance rates of A. baumannii to polymyxin and tigecycline were 2.8% (14/501) and 3.4% (17/501) respectively, and that of P. aeruginosa to carbapenem were 18.9% (103/546). Conclusions:The surveillance results from 2018 to 2019 showed that the main pathogens of bloodstream infection in China were gram-negative bacteria, while E. coli was the most common pathogen, and ESBLs-producing strains were in majority; the MRSA incidence is getting lower in China; carbapenem-resistant E. coli keeps at a low level, while carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae is on the rise obviously.
6.Distribution and antimicrobial resistance profile of clinical bacterial isolates from blood culture in China, 2014-2015
Yunbo CHEN ; Jinru JI ; Chaoqun YING ; Ying HUANG ; Jilu SHEN ; Hui DING ; Jinwei HUANG ; Yuanyuan DAI ; Yongyun LIU ; Liping ZHANG ; Liang GUO ; Baohua ZHANG ; Yanhong LI ; Haifeng MAO ; Li WANG ; Lin ZHENG ; Beiqing GU ; Haixin DONG ; Chuandan WAN ; Zhixiang LIAO ; Rong XU ; Shuyan HU ; Li SUN ; Shucun ZHANG ; Lan MA ; Bo QUAN ; Jianzhong WANG ; Zhenghai YANG ; Wencheng ZHU ; Fei DU ; Dengyan QIAO ; Xiusan XIA ; Lanjuan LI ; Yonghong XIAO
Chinese Journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases 2019;12(1):24-37
Objective To analyze the distribution and antimicrobial resistance profile of clinical bacterial strains isolated from blood culture in China.Methods Clinical bacterial strains isolated from blood culture from participating hospitals of Blood Bacterial Resistance Investigation Collaborative System (BRICS) during January 2014 to December 2015 were collected.Antibiotic susceptibility tests were conducted with agar dilution or broth dilution methods as recommended by US Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute(CLSI)2018.The data were analyzed with Whonet 5.6 software.Results During the study period,4 801 clinical bacterial isolates were collected from 26 hospitals,of which 1 798 (37.5%) were Gram-positive bacteria and 3 003 (62.5%) were gram-negative bacteria.The top 10 isolates were Escherichia coli (33.8%),coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (19.0%),Klebsiella pneumoniae (11.9%),Staphylococcus aureus (10.1%),Acinetobacter baumannii (4.0%),Pseudomonas aeruginosa (3.8%),Streptococcus (3.0%),Enterobacter sulcus (2.9%),Enterococcus faecium (2.8%) and Enterococcus faecalis (1.8%).Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillinresistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (MRCNS) accounted for 33.9% (165/487) and 56.9% (520/913) of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus respectively.No vancomycinresistant Staphylococcus was detected.The resistance rate of Enterococcus faecium to vancomycin was 0.7% (1/135),and no vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecaliss was detected.The positive rates of extendedspectrum β-1actamases(ESBLs)-producing Escherichia coli,Klebsiella pneumoniae and Proteus were 56.9% (923/1 621),30.1% (172/572) and 29.2% (7/24),respectively.The positive rates of carbapenemresistant Escherichia coli,Klebsiella pneumoniae,Enterobacter,Salmonella and Citrobacter were 1.2% (20/1 621),7.2% (41/572),4.3% (6/141),1.5% (1/67) and 2.9% (1/34),respectively.The resistance rates of Acinetobacter baumannii to polymyxin and tegacycline were 2.6% (5/190) and 8.9% (17/190)respectively,and that of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to polymyxin and fosfomycin were 1.1% (2/183)and 0.6% (1/183),respectively.Conclusions The surveillance results from 2014 to 2015 show that the main pathogens of blood stream infection in China are Gram-negative bacteria,while Escherichia coli is the most common pathogen,the detection rate of MRSA is lower than other surveillance data in the same period in China;carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli are at a low level as shown in this surveillance.
7.BRICS report of 2016-2017: the distribution and antimicrobial resistance profile of clinical isolates from blood culture in China
Yunbo CHEN ; Jinru JI ; Chaoqun YING ; Peipei WANG ; Qing YANG ; Haishen KONG ; Yongyun LIU ; Ying HUANG ; Yuanyuan DAI ; Liping ZHANG ; Hui DING ; Liang GUO ; Baohua ZHANG ; Lisha ZHU ; Haifeng MAO ; Zhixiang LIAO ; Yanhong LI ; Lu WANG ; Shuyan HU ; Zhenghai YANG ; Beiqing GU ; Haixin DONG ; Fei DU ; Lin ZHENG ; Bo QUAN ; Wencheng ZHU ; Jianzhong WANG ; Lan MA ; Rong XU ; Li SUN ; Aiyun LI ; Junmin CAO ; Jinhua LIANG ; Hongyun XU ; Kunpeng LIANG ; Dengyan QIAO ; Xiaoyan QI ; Xiusan XIA ; Lanjuan LI ; Yonghong XIAO
Chinese Journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases 2020;13(1):42-54
Objective:To investigate the distribution and antimicrobial resistance profile of clinical bacteria isolated from blood culture in China.Methods:The clinical bacterial strains isolated from blood culture from member hospitals of Blood Bacterial Resistant Investigation Collaborative System (BRICS) were collected during January 2016 to December 2017. Antibiotic susceptibility tests were conducted by agar dilution or broth dilution methods recommended by US Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2019. WHONET 5.6 was used to analyze data.Results:During the study period, 8 154 bacterial strains were collected from 33 hospitals, of which 2 325 (28.5%) were Gram-positive bacteria and 5 829 (71.5%) were Gram-negative bacteria. The top 10 bacterial species were Escherichia coli (34.7%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (15.8%), Staphylococcus aureus (11.3%), coagulase-negative Staphylococci (7.4%), Acinetobacter baumannii (4.6%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (3.9%), Enterococcus faecium (3.8%), Streptococci (2.9%), Enterobacter cloacae (2.7%) and Enterococcus faecalis (2.5%). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (MRCNS) accounted for 34.2%(315/922) and 77.7%(470/605), respectively. No vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus was detected. The resistance rate of Enterococcus faecium to vancomycin was 0.6%(2/312), and no vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium was detected. The ESBLs-producing rates in Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Proteus were 55.7%(1 576/2 831), 29.9%(386/1 289) and 38.5%(15/39), respectively. The incidences of carbapenem-resistance in Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae were 1.2%(33/2 831), 17.5%(226/1 289), respectively. The resistance rates of Acinetobacter baumannii to polymyxin and tigecycline were 14.8%(55/372) and 5.9%(22/372) respectively, and those of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to polymyxin and carbapenem were 1.3%(4/315) and 18.7%(59/315), respectively. Conclusion:The surveillance results from 2016 to 2017 showed that the main pathogens of blood stream infection in China were gram-negative bacteria, while Escherichia coli was the most common pathogen; the MRSA incidence was lower than other surveillance data in the same period in China; carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli was at a low level during this surveillance, while carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae is on the rise.