1.A new method for measuring electrocardiogram and its implement
Chuisheng ZENG ; Yahua MOU ; Ying XIN ; Zhiqiang ZHAO ; Liuxin XIANG
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research 2010;14(17):3120-3122
BACKGROUND: The existing electrocardiogram(ECG)measurement strongly depends on medical professionals and inefficient high-intensity,or relies on automatic identification method which is not accurately enough.Thus,this is difficult to meet high-speed testing,accurate results and ease application for common people.OBJECTIVE: To develop a new method that was simple and efficient to apply and very easy to learn.METHODS: Algorithms were programmed and test software was developed by delphi7.0.ECG was drawn on screen.The apex,the starting point and the ending point as well as the J-point of each ECG wave were clicked by mouse or stylus.Then the wave parameters and an initial diagnosis could be quickly obtained by test software.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The parameters of ECG waveform such as wave height,wave time,PR interval,ST segment,QT segment,PP/RR time,cardiac electrical axis and so on could be accurately measured,and heart rate,heart rhythm and the deflection of cardiac electrical axis could be diagnosed correctly.The method was simple to learn and easy to imply,and it was also efficient,quick and accurate.Thus,it could greatly improve the efficiency of measurement and analysis for specialists,and could meet application requirements of general medicals and ordinary people.
2.Predictive value of preoperative alkaline phosphatase to prealbumin ratio in prognosis and postoperative complications in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after radical tumor resection
Shengdeng CHEN ; Zhiqiang MOU ; Zhongyao CHEN ; Jian WEN ; Qiu LI
Journal of Clinical Hepatology 2023;39(1):118-127
Objective To explore the predictive value of preoperative alkaline phosphatase to prealbumin ratio (APR) in prognosis and postoperative complications for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after radical tumor resection. Methods A total of 217 HCC patients who underwent radical tumor resection in the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery of the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from January 2013 to August 2021 were retrospectively recruited and their clinical data were statistically analyzed. The X-tile software was used to obtain the optimal cutoff value of APR. The χ 2 test was conducted to analyze association between preoperative APR and other clinicopathological characteristics. The Kaplan-Meier curve was plotted and the Log-rank test was performed to analyze survival of patients. The univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to analysis factors affecting the prognosis of HCC patients. The univariate analysis and multivariate Logistic regression were used to identify factors related with postoperative complications. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the predicting value of APR. Results The optimal cutoff value for APR ratio was 0.5 and these 217 patients were divided into the low- and high APR groups (111 vs 106 cases) accordingly. Compared with the low-APR group, the proportion of patients with ALT (> 50 U/L), Alb (< 40 g/L), the CNLC of the III stage, open surgery, liver cirrhosis, multiple tumor lesions, postoperative complication, and major complication were significantly increased in the high-APR patients (all P < 0.05). Moreover, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 86.0%, 74.9%, and 71.3%, respectively in the low-APR patients, while the numbers were 79.2%, 57.5%, and 47.0%, respectively, in the high-APR patients, indicating that patients in high-APR group had significantly worse OS ( P =0.002). AFP ( HR =1.774, 95% CI : 1.107-2.843, P =0.017), CNLC stage ( HR =2.708, 95% CI : 1.514-4.844, P =0.001), tumor size ( HR =1.696, 95% CI : 1.060-2.714, P =0.028), and APR ( HR =2.022, 95% CI : 1.244-3.285, P =0.004) were all independent risk predictors for OS. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS were 82.3%, 69.4%, and 61.3%, respectively, in the low-APR patients, whereas the numbers were 76.2%, 54.4%, and 44.2%, respectively in the high-APR patients, suggesting that high-APR patients had significantly worse recurrence-free survival ( P =0.016). The CNLC stage ( HR =2.509, 95% CI : 1.423-4.422, P =0.001), tumor size ( HR =1.725, 95% CI : 1.119-2.660, P =0.014), and APR ( HR =1.619: 95% CI : 1.037-2.527, P =0.034) were all independent FRS predictors. Hypertension ( OR =3.09, 95% CI : 1.385-6.893, P =0.006), open surgery ( OR =4.198, 95% CI : 1.779-9.907, P =0.001), liver cirrhosis ( OR =2.376, 95% CI : 1.194-4.729, P =0.014), and APR ( OR =2.151, 95% CI : 1.160-3.986, P =0.015) were all independent risk predictors for the postoperative major complications. The AUC for APR, ALP, a nd PA in predicting the major complications was 0.625 (95% CI : 0.547-0.702), 0.613 (95% CI : 0.534-0.693), and 0.554 (0.474-0.634). Conclusion Preoperative APR could be used to predict prognosis and postoperative major complications of HCC patients after radical tumor resection.
3.Chinese expert consensus on blood support mode and blood transfusion strategies for emergency treatment of severe trauma patients (version 2024)
Yao LU ; Yang LI ; Leiying ZHANG ; Hao TANG ; Huidan JING ; Yaoli WANG ; Xiangzhi JIA ; Li BA ; Maohong BIAN ; Dan CAI ; Hui CAI ; Xiaohong CAI ; Zhanshan ZHA ; Bingyu CHEN ; Daqing CHEN ; Feng CHEN ; Guoan CHEN ; Haiming CHEN ; Jing CHEN ; Min CHEN ; Qing CHEN ; Shu CHEN ; Xi CHEN ; Jinfeng CHENG ; Xiaoling CHU ; Hongwang CUI ; Xin CUI ; Zhen DA ; Ying DAI ; Surong DENG ; Weiqun DONG ; Weimin FAN ; Ke FENG ; Danhui FU ; Yongshui FU ; Qi FU ; Xuemei FU ; Jia GAN ; Xinyu GAN ; Wei GAO ; Huaizheng GONG ; Rong GUI ; Geng GUO ; Ning HAN ; Yiwen HAO ; Wubing HE ; Qiang HONG ; Ruiqin HOU ; Wei HOU ; Jie HU ; Peiyang HU ; Xi HU ; Xiaoyu HU ; Guangbin HUANG ; Jie HUANG ; Xiangyan HUANG ; Yuanshuai HUANG ; Shouyong HUN ; Xuebing JIANG ; Ping JIN ; Dong LAI ; Aiping LE ; Hongmei LI ; Bijuan LI ; Cuiying LI ; Daihong LI ; Haihong LI ; He LI ; Hui LI ; Jianping LI ; Ning LI ; Xiying LI ; Xiangmin LI ; Xiaofei LI ; Xiaojuan LI ; Zhiqiang LI ; Zhongjun LI ; Zunyan LI ; Huaqin LIANG ; Xiaohua LIANG ; Dongfa LIAO ; Qun LIAO ; Yan LIAO ; Jiajin LIN ; Chunxia LIU ; Fenghua LIU ; Peixian LIU ; Tiemei LIU ; Xiaoxin LIU ; Zhiwei LIU ; Zhongdi LIU ; Hua LU ; Jianfeng LUAN ; Jianjun LUO ; Qun LUO ; Dingfeng LYU ; Qi LYU ; Xianping LYU ; Aijun MA ; Liqiang MA ; Shuxuan MA ; Xainjun MA ; Xiaogang MA ; Xiaoli MA ; Guoqing MAO ; Shijie MU ; Shaolin NIE ; Shujuan OUYANG ; Xilin OUYANG ; Chunqiu PAN ; Jian PAN ; Xiaohua PAN ; Lei PENG ; Tao PENG ; Baohua QIAN ; Shu QIAO ; Li QIN ; Ying REN ; Zhaoqi REN ; Ruiming RONG ; Changshan SU ; Mingwei SUN ; Wenwu SUN ; Zhenwei SUN ; Haiping TANG ; Xiaofeng TANG ; Changjiu TANG ; Cuihua TAO ; Zhibin TIAN ; Juan WANG ; Baoyan WANG ; Chunyan WANG ; Gefei WANG ; Haiyan WANG ; Hongjie WANG ; Peng WANG ; Pengli WANG ; Qiushi WANG ; Xiaoning WANG ; Xinhua WANG ; Xuefeng WANG ; Yong WANG ; Yongjun WANG ; Yuanjie WANG ; Zhihua WANG ; Shaojun WEI ; Yaming WEI ; Jianbo WEN ; Jun WEN ; Jiang WU ; Jufeng WU ; Aijun XIA ; Fei XIA ; Rong XIA ; Jue XIE ; Yanchao XING ; Yan XIONG ; Feng XU ; Yongzhu XU ; Yongan XU ; Yonghe YAN ; Beizhan YAN ; Jiang YANG ; Jiangcun YANG ; Jun YANG ; Xinwen YANG ; Yongyi YANG ; Chunyan YAO ; Mingliang YE ; Changlin YIN ; Ming YIN ; Wen YIN ; Lianling YU ; Shuhong YU ; Zebo YU ; Yigang YU ; Anyong YU ; Hong YUAN ; Yi YUAN ; Chan ZHANG ; Jinjun ZHANG ; Jun ZHANG ; Kai ZHANG ; Leibing ZHANG ; Quan ZHANG ; Rongjiang ZHANG ; Sanming ZHANG ; Shengji ZHANG ; Shuo ZHANG ; Wei ZHANG ; Weidong ZHANG ; Xi ZHANG ; Xingwen ZHANG ; Guixi ZHANG ; Xiaojun ZHANG ; Guoqing ZHAO ; Jianpeng ZHAO ; Shuming ZHAO ; Beibei ZHENG ; Shangen ZHENG ; Huayou ZHOU ; Jicheng ZHOU ; Lihong ZHOU ; Mou ZHOU ; Xiaoyu ZHOU ; Xuelian ZHOU ; Yuan ZHOU ; Zheng ZHOU ; Zuhuang ZHOU ; Haiyan ZHU ; Peiyuan ZHU ; Changju ZHU ; Lili ZHU ; Zhengguo WANG ; Jianxin JIANG ; Deqing WANG ; Jiongcai LAN ; Quanli WANG ; Yang YU ; Lianyang ZHANG ; Aiqing WEN
Chinese Journal of Trauma 2024;40(10):865-881
Patients with severe trauma require an extremely timely treatment and transfusion plays an irreplaceable role in the emergency treatment of such patients. An increasing number of evidence-based medicinal evidences and clinical practices suggest that patients with severe traumatic bleeding benefit from early transfusion of low-titer group O whole blood or hemostatic resuscitation with red blood cells, plasma and platelet of a balanced ratio. However, the current domestic mode of blood supply cannot fully meet the requirements of timely and effective blood transfusion for emergency treatment of patients with severe trauma in clinical practice. In order to solve the key problems in blood supply and blood transfusion strategies for emergency treatment of severe trauma, Branch of Clinical Transfusion Medicine of Chinese Medical Association, Group for Trauma Emergency Care and Multiple Injuries of Trauma Branch of Chinese Medical Association, Young Scholar Group of Disaster Medicine Branch of Chinese Medical Association organized domestic experts of blood transfusion medicine and trauma treatment to jointly formulate Chinese expert consensus on blood support mode and blood transfusion strategies for emergency treatment of severe trauma patients ( version 2024). Based on the evidence-based medical evidence and Delphi method of expert consultation and voting, 10 recommendations were put forward from two aspects of blood support mode and transfusion strategies, aiming to provide a reference for transfusion resuscitation in the emergency treatment of severe trauma and further improve the success rate of treatment of patients with severe trauma.