AIM: To analyze the modeling characteristics and validation indexes of diabetic retinopathy model, analyze the shortcomings of the present animal experimental modeling, and provide a reference basis for the establishment of the standardization of the diabetic retinopathy model.METHODS: Literatures related to animal experiments on diabetic retinopathy were searched through the databases of CNKI, Wanfang, VIP and PubMed, and the experimental animal species, grade, gender, age, modeling method, modeling period, validation indexes, and other indexes were summarized and analyzed.RESULTS: The 275 papers that met the criteria were included. The animal models of diabetic retinopathy were mainly SD rats and Wistar rats, the sex of the experimental animals was mainly male, and the animal breeds were mostly of the SPF class. The age of most of the animals used was in the range of 6-8 weeks old; the modeling was based on those who established the type 1 diabetes model, mainly using STZ as the induction model. While the type 2 diabetes model was based on the high-fat, high-sugar diet combined with STZ. The modeling criteria were verified by detecting retinal morphology and structure, retinal vascularization, retinal function, and retinal cell apoptosis. In addition, the model was evaluated by detecting abnormal vascular proliferation, oxidative stress indicators, and inflammatory factor levels in retinal tissues, as well as abnormal vascular proliferation and inflammatory factor levels in aqueous humour, vitreous humor, and blood serum.CONCLUSION: Although the animal model of diabetic retinopathy has become a hotspot, the existing review is not comprehensive. Therefore, we summarized and analyzed the elements of the animal model through literature collation, including its characteristics and limitations, and providing methodological references for the establishment of the model, with a view to laying a solid foundation for the subsequent clinical and basic research of traditional Chinese medicine.

During the Jin dynasty,the two major academic schools of Hejian and Yishui emerged in northern China.At this time,the Song dynasty migrated southward,accompanied by the southward movement of the Han ethnic culture and economic center.The dissemination of medicine also showed a trend of spreading from the north to the south.The late Yuan dynasty was an important period for the academic dissemination of the Yishui school to the south.On the one hand,ZHU Danxi,GE Yinglei,HUA Shou,and other clinicians studied the academic works of LI Dongyuan,comprehended his academic ideas,and further disseminated them through their disciples and Confucian scholars.On the other hand,academic works such as Jisheng Bacui and Weisheng Baojian carrying the study of Yishui were published in the south,playing an essential role in disseminating Yishui's study in the south.The dissemination of Yishui's learning to the south adopted a combination of book learning and mentorship,effectively breaking down the academic barriers between the Hejian and Yishui schools.The network formed by the interaction between medical scholars and Confucian scholars was an essential medium for academic dissemination.The study of Yishui was transmitted to the south and integrated with the original spleen and stomach theory in the south,promoting the further development of traditional Chinese medicine spleen and stomach theory.

During the Jin dynasty,the two major academic schools of Hejian and Yishui emerged in northern China.At this time,the Song dynasty migrated southward,accompanied by the southward movement of the Han ethnic culture and economic center.The dissemination of medicine also showed a trend of spreading from the north to the south.The late Yuan dynasty was an important period for the academic dissemination of the Yishui school to the south.On the one hand,ZHU Danxi,GE Yinglei,HUA Shou,and other clinicians studied the academic works of LI Dongyuan,comprehended his academic ideas,and further disseminated them through their disciples and Confucian scholars.On the other hand,academic works such as Jisheng Bacui and Weisheng Baojian carrying the study of Yishui were published in the south,playing an essential role in disseminating Yishui's study in the south.The dissemination of Yishui's learning to the south adopted a combination of book learning and mentorship,effectively breaking down the academic barriers between the Hejian and Yishui schools.The network formed by the interaction between medical scholars and Confucian scholars was an essential medium for academic dissemination.The study of Yishui was transmitted to the south and integrated with the original spleen and stomach theory in the south,promoting the further development of traditional Chinese medicine spleen and stomach theory.

During the Jin dynasty,the two major academic schools of Hejian and Yishui emerged in northern China.At this time,the Song dynasty migrated southward,accompanied by the southward movement of the Han ethnic culture and economic center.The dissemination of medicine also showed a trend of spreading from the north to the south.The late Yuan dynasty was an important period for the academic dissemination of the Yishui school to the south.On the one hand,ZHU Danxi,GE Yinglei,HUA Shou,and other clinicians studied the academic works of LI Dongyuan,comprehended his academic ideas,and further disseminated them through their disciples and Confucian scholars.On the other hand,academic works such as Jisheng Bacui and Weisheng Baojian carrying the study of Yishui were published in the south,playing an essential role in disseminating Yishui's study in the south.The dissemination of Yishui's learning to the south adopted a combination of book learning and mentorship,effectively breaking down the academic barriers between the Hejian and Yishui schools.The network formed by the interaction between medical scholars and Confucian scholars was an essential medium for academic dissemination.The study of Yishui was transmitted to the south and integrated with the original spleen and stomach theory in the south,promoting the further development of traditional Chinese medicine spleen and stomach theory.

During the Jin dynasty,the two major academic schools of Hejian and Yishui emerged in northern China.At this time,the Song dynasty migrated southward,accompanied by the southward movement of the Han ethnic culture and economic center.The dissemination of medicine also showed a trend of spreading from the north to the south.The late Yuan dynasty was an important period for the academic dissemination of the Yishui school to the south.On the one hand,ZHU Danxi,GE Yinglei,HUA Shou,and other clinicians studied the academic works of LI Dongyuan,comprehended his academic ideas,and further disseminated them through their disciples and Confucian scholars.On the other hand,academic works such as Jisheng Bacui and Weisheng Baojian carrying the study of Yishui were published in the south,playing an essential role in disseminating Yishui's study in the south.The dissemination of Yishui's learning to the south adopted a combination of book learning and mentorship,effectively breaking down the academic barriers between the Hejian and Yishui schools.The network formed by the interaction between medical scholars and Confucian scholars was an essential medium for academic dissemination.The study of Yishui was transmitted to the south and integrated with the original spleen and stomach theory in the south,promoting the further development of traditional Chinese medicine spleen and stomach theory.

During the Jin dynasty,the two major academic schools of Hejian and Yishui emerged in northern China.At this time,the Song dynasty migrated southward,accompanied by the southward movement of the Han ethnic culture and economic center.The dissemination of medicine also showed a trend of spreading from the north to the south.The late Yuan dynasty was an important period for the academic dissemination of the Yishui school to the south.On the one hand,ZHU Danxi,GE Yinglei,HUA Shou,and other clinicians studied the academic works of LI Dongyuan,comprehended his academic ideas,and further disseminated them through their disciples and Confucian scholars.On the other hand,academic works such as Jisheng Bacui and Weisheng Baojian carrying the study of Yishui were published in the south,playing an essential role in disseminating Yishui's study in the south.The dissemination of Yishui's learning to the south adopted a combination of book learning and mentorship,effectively breaking down the academic barriers between the Hejian and Yishui schools.The network formed by the interaction between medical scholars and Confucian scholars was an essential medium for academic dissemination.The study of Yishui was transmitted to the south and integrated with the original spleen and stomach theory in the south,promoting the further development of traditional Chinese medicine spleen and stomach theory.

During the Jin dynasty,the two major academic schools of Hejian and Yishui emerged in northern China.At this time,the Song dynasty migrated southward,accompanied by the southward movement of the Han ethnic culture and economic center.The dissemination of medicine also showed a trend of spreading from the north to the south.The late Yuan dynasty was an important period for the academic dissemination of the Yishui school to the south.On the one hand,ZHU Danxi,GE Yinglei,HUA Shou,and other clinicians studied the academic works of LI Dongyuan,comprehended his academic ideas,and further disseminated them through their disciples and Confucian scholars.On the other hand,academic works such as Jisheng Bacui and Weisheng Baojian carrying the study of Yishui were published in the south,playing an essential role in disseminating Yishui's study in the south.The dissemination of Yishui's learning to the south adopted a combination of book learning and mentorship,effectively breaking down the academic barriers between the Hejian and Yishui schools.The network formed by the interaction between medical scholars and Confucian scholars was an essential medium for academic dissemination.The study of Yishui was transmitted to the south and integrated with the original spleen and stomach theory in the south,promoting the further development of traditional Chinese medicine spleen and stomach theory.

During the Jin dynasty,the two major academic schools of Hejian and Yishui emerged in northern China.At this time,the Song dynasty migrated southward,accompanied by the southward movement of the Han ethnic culture and economic center.The dissemination of medicine also showed a trend of spreading from the north to the south.The late Yuan dynasty was an important period for the academic dissemination of the Yishui school to the south.On the one hand,ZHU Danxi,GE Yinglei,HUA Shou,and other clinicians studied the academic works of LI Dongyuan,comprehended his academic ideas,and further disseminated them through their disciples and Confucian scholars.On the other hand,academic works such as Jisheng Bacui and Weisheng Baojian carrying the study of Yishui were published in the south,playing an essential role in disseminating Yishui's study in the south.The dissemination of Yishui's learning to the south adopted a combination of book learning and mentorship,effectively breaking down the academic barriers between the Hejian and Yishui schools.The network formed by the interaction between medical scholars and Confucian scholars was an essential medium for academic dissemination.The study of Yishui was transmitted to the south and integrated with the original spleen and stomach theory in the south,promoting the further development of traditional Chinese medicine spleen and stomach theory.

During the Jin dynasty,the two major academic schools of Hejian and Yishui emerged in northern China.At this time,the Song dynasty migrated southward,accompanied by the southward movement of the Han ethnic culture and economic center.The dissemination of medicine also showed a trend of spreading from the north to the south.The late Yuan dynasty was an important period for the academic dissemination of the Yishui school to the south.On the one hand,ZHU Danxi,GE Yinglei,HUA Shou,and other clinicians studied the academic works of LI Dongyuan,comprehended his academic ideas,and further disseminated them through their disciples and Confucian scholars.On the other hand,academic works such as Jisheng Bacui and Weisheng Baojian carrying the study of Yishui were published in the south,playing an essential role in disseminating Yishui's study in the south.The dissemination of Yishui's learning to the south adopted a combination of book learning and mentorship,effectively breaking down the academic barriers between the Hejian and Yishui schools.The network formed by the interaction between medical scholars and Confucian scholars was an essential medium for academic dissemination.The study of Yishui was transmitted to the south and integrated with the original spleen and stomach theory in the south,promoting the further development of traditional Chinese medicine spleen and stomach theory.

Objective:To investigate the efficacy of liver wedge resection and liver Ⅳb and Ⅴ segmentectomy for T2 gallbladder carcinoma (GBC).Methods:The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 168 patients who underwent radical resection of T2 GBC in The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi′an Jiaotong University from January 2011 to December 2021 were collected. There were 59 males and 109 females, aged (65±10)years. Of 168 patients, there were 112 cases in T2a stage and 56 cases in T2b stage. Of 112 patients in T2a stage, 73 cases underwent liver wedge resection and 39 cases underwent liver Ⅳb and Ⅴ segmentectomy. Of 56 patients in T2b stage, 27 cases underwent liver wedge resection and 29 cases underwent liver Ⅳb and Ⅴ segmen-tectomy. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean± SD, and measure-ment data with skewed distribution were represented as M(range). Count data were described as absolute numbers, and comparison between groups was conducted using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability. Comparison of ordinal data was conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival rate and draw survival curve, and the Log-rank test was used for survival analysis. The COX proportional risk model was used for univariate and multivariate analyses. Results:(1) Clinical data analysis of patients undergoing different extent of hepatic resection for T2 GBC. There was no significant difference in gender, age, cholecystoli-thiasis, preoperative total bilirubin, carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19-9, CA125, incidental GBC, perineural invasion, microvascular invasion, pathological differentiation, histopathological subtypes, N staging, TNM staging between patients with T2a and T2b GBC who underwent different extent of hepatic resection ( P>0.05). (2) Prognostic analysis of T2 GBC patients undergoing different extent of hepatic resection. The 1-, 3- and 5-year cumulative disease-free survival rates of T2 GBC patients undergoing liver wedge resection were 78.0%, 60.1% and 51.4%, respectively, versus 86.8%, 80.0% and 68.0% of T2 GBC patients undergoing liver Ⅳb and Ⅴ segmentectomy, showing a significant difference between them ( χ2 =5.205, P<0.05). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative overall survival rates of T2 GBC patients undergoing liver wedge resection were 85.0%, 62.5%, and 55.1%, respectively, versus 92.6%, 81.6%, and 68.8% for T2 GBC patients undergoing liver Ⅳb and Ⅴ segmentectomy, showing a significant difference in cumulative overall survival rate between them ( χ2=4.351, P<0.05). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative disease-free survival rates of T2b GBC patients undergoing liver wedge resection were 70.4%, 45.9% and 39.2%, respectively, versus 89.7%, 71.3% and 54.0% of T2b GBC patients undergoing liver Ⅳb and Ⅴ segmentectomy, showing a significant difference between them ( χ2=5.047, P<0.05). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative overall survival rates of T2b GBC patients undergoing liver wedge resection were 81.5%, 53.2%, and 41.0%, respectively, versus 89.7%, 77.0%, and 60.7% of T2b GBC patients undergoing liver Ⅳb and Ⅴ segmentectomy, showing no significant difference in cumulative overall survival rate between them ( χ2=4.014, P<0.05). (3) Analysis of factors influencing prognosis of patients undergoing radical resection for T2 GBC. Results of multivariate analysis showed that CA19-9>39.0 U/mL, perineural invasion, N1 and N2 stage were independent risk factors influencing disease-free survival time of patients undergoing radical resection for T2 GBC ( hazard ratio=2.736, 3.496, 2.638, 17.440, 95% confidence interval as 1.195-6.266, 1.213-10.073, 1.429-4.869, 8.362-36.374, P<0.05). Liver Ⅳb and Ⅴ segmentectomy was an independent protective factor influencing disease-free survival time of patients undergoing radical resection for T2 GBC ( hazard ratio=0.418, 95% confidence interval as 0.230-0.759, P<0.05). CA19-9 >39.0 U/mL, perineural invasion, ⅡB stage, ⅢB stage and ⅣB stage of TNM staging were independent risk factors influencing overall survival time of patients undergoing radical resection for T2 GBC ( hazard ratio=2.740, 3.210, 2.037, 3.439, 24.466, 95% confidence interval as 1.127-6.664, 1.049-9.819, 1.004-4.125, 1.730-6.846, 10.733-55.842, P<0.05). Liver Ⅳb and Ⅴ segmentectomy was an independent protective factor influencing overall survival time of patients undergoing radical resec-tion for T2 GBC ( hazard ratio=0.476, 95% confidence interval as 0.261-0.867, P<0.05). (4) Analysis of postoperative complications in patients undergoing different extent of hepatic resection for T2 GBC. There was no significant difference in postoperative complications of patients with T2a and T2b GBC undergoing liver wedge resection or liver Ⅳb and Ⅴ segmentectomy ( P>0.05). Conclusions:Compared to liver wedge resection, liver Ⅳb and Ⅴ segmentectomy can effectively prolong the disease-free survival overall survival time of T2b GBC patients. There is no significant difference in the major complications. Liver Ⅳb and Ⅴ segmentectomy is an independent protective factor for prognosis of patients undergoing radical resection for T2 GBC.