Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of permanent 125I prostate brachytherapy monotherapy in patients with early prostate cancer. Methods A total of 18 patients with prostate cancer was diagnosed by prostate biopsy,with Gleason score 5 - 6,average PSA 5.09 ng/ml (range,0.38 -8.73 ),and clinical stage T1c - T2a.All patients underwent 3-dimensional conformal brachytherapy with transperineal ultrasound-guide 125I seeds prostate implantation. Results None of the patients had any adverse events during the operation processes.The operation time was from 37 to 52 minutes and postoperative hospitalization time was from 3 to 4 days.The mean number of implanted 125I seeds was 54.All patients were followed up for 3 to 57 months with a mean of 15 months,while one patient was lost during followingup.The survival rate of PSA progression free was 100％ (17/17).The PSA was under 0.2 ng/ml for a long time in the 7 cases who had been followed-up for more than 18 months.The PSA did not show any rising trend in all 17 cases.No severe complications occurred in all cases. Conclusions Brachytherapy monotherapy with 125I seeds implantation is safe and effective for patients with early prostate cancer.

Objective To compare the role of CTE and CE on the diagnosis of small bowel diseases and evaluate their advantages in patients with different indications.Methods Patients underwent both CTE and CE(interval time <2 weeks)at our institution in recent 3 years were enrolled.The positive detection rates,lesion properties and characteristics of CTE and CE were compared.The diagnostic accuracy of combined method was also analyzed.Results A total of 47 patients were enrolled and the indications included suspected or established Crohn′s disease (28 cases),unexplained abdominal pain (14 cases), obscure gastrointestinal bleeding(3 cases),insufficient small bowel obstruction(1 case)and protein losing enteropathy(1 case).Diagnostic yield of CTE and CE for whole small bowel disorders showed no significant difference(CE 83.0% VS CTE 78.7%,P =0.791).For suspected or established CD,CE had a higher diagnostic accuracy than CTE (78.6% VS 35.7%,P =0.002 ),especially in detecting lesions in the jejunum(CE 50.0% VS CTE 7.1%,P =0.002).The diagnostic accuracy reached 100.0% when two meth-ods were combined.For unexplained abdominal pain,no significant difference was found in the diagnostic ac-curacy of CE and CTE(CTE 42.8% VS CE 50.0%,P =1.000).Diagnostic accuracy of combining CTE and CE was 85.7%.Conclusion CTE and CE are both valuable in detecting small bowel lesions.For pa-tients with suspected or established CD,CE is better than CTE.For patients with unexplained abdominal pain,a combination of CTE and CE may be a better strategy than use CTE or CE alone.