1.Poor performance of the modified early warning score for predicting mortality in critically ill patients presenting to an emergency department
Ho Onn LE ; Li HUIHUA ; Shahidah NUR ; Koh Xiong ZHI ; Sultana PAPIA ; Marcus Eng Hock ONG
World Journal of Emergency Medicine 2013;4(4):273-277
BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to validate the use of the modified early warning score (MEWS) as a predictor of patient mortality and intensive care unit (ICU)/ high dependency (HD) admission in an Asian population. METHODS: The MEWS was applied to a retrospective cohort of 1024 critically ill patients presenting to a large Asian tertiary emergency department (ED) between November 2006 and December 2007. Individual MEWS was calculated based on vital signs parameters on arrival at ED. Outcomes of mortality and ICU/HD admission were obtained from hospital records. The ability of the composite MEWS and its individual components to predict mortality within 30 days from ED visit was assessed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were derived and compared with values from other cohorts. A MEWS of ≥4 was chosen as the cut-off value for poor prognosis based on previous studies. RESULTS: A total of 311 (30.4%) critically ill patients were presented with a MEWS ≥4. Their mean age was 61.4 years (SD 18.1) with a male to female ratio of 1.10. Of the 311 patients, 53 (17%) died within 30 days, 64 (20.6%) were admitted to ICU and 86 (27.7%) were admitted to HD. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.71 with a sensitivity of 53.0% and a specificity of 72.1% in addition to a positive predictive value (PPV) of 17.0% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 93.4% (MEWS cut-off of ≥4) for predicting mortality. CONCLUSION: The composite MEWS did not perform wel in predicting poor patient outcomes for critical y il patients presenting to an ED.
2.Clinical evaluation of the use of laryngeal tube versus laryngeal mask airway for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by paramedics in Singapore.
Jing Jing CHAN ; Zi Xin GOH ; Zhi Xiong KOH ; Janice Jie Er SOO ; Jes FERGUS ; Yih Yng NG ; John Carson ALLEN ; Marcus Eng Hock ONG
Singapore medical journal 2022;63(3):157-161
INTRODUCTION:
It remains unclear which advanced airway device has better placement success and fewer adverse events in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the VBM laryngeal tube (LT) against the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in OHCAs managed by emergency ambulances in Singapore.
METHODS:
This was a real-world, prospective, cluster-randomised crossover study. All OHCA patients above 13 years of age who were suitable for resuscitation were randomised to receive either LT or LMA. The primary outcome was placement success. Per-protocol analysis was performed, and the association between outcomes and airway device group was compared using multivariate binomial logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS:
Of 965 patients with OHCAs from March 2016 to January 2018, 905 met the inclusion criteria, of whom 502 (55.5%) were randomised to receive LT while 403 (44.5%) were randomised to receive LMA. Only 174 patients in the LT group actually received the device owing to noncompliance. Placement success rate for LT was lower than for LMA (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.90). Complications were more likely when using LT (OR 2.82,0 95% CI 1.64-4.86). Adjusted OR for prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was similar in both groups. A modified intention-to-treat analysis showed similar outcomes to the per-protocol analysis between the groups.
CONCLUSION
LT was associated with poorer placement success and higher complication rates than LMA. The likelihood of prehospital ROSC was similar between the two groups. Familiarity bias and a low compliance rate to LT were the main limitations of this study.
Allied Health Personnel
;
Humans
;
Intubation, Intratracheal
;
Laryngeal Masks
;
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy*
;
Prospective Studies
;
Singapore
3.Comparison of inhalational methoxyflurane (Penthrox®) and intramuscular tramadol for prehospital analgesia.
Kegan Jianhong LIM ; Zhi Xiong KOH ; Yih Yng NG ; Stephanie FOOK-CHONG ; Andrew Fu Wah HO ; Nausheen Edwin DOCTOR ; Nur Ain Zafirah Mohd SAID ; Marcus Eng Hock ONG
Singapore medical journal 2021;62(6):281-286
INTRODUCTION:
Treatment of pain is an important component of prehospital care. Inhalational analgesia agents have attractive strengths, but there is a paucity of studies comparing these with more conventional agents. We aimed to compare inhalational methoxyflurane and intramuscular (IM) tramadol as first-contact analgesia in the Singapore national ambulance service.
METHODS:
Ambulances were randomised to carry either methoxyflurane or IM tramadol for the first six months and crossed over to the other arm after six months. Patients aged ≥ 16 years, with acute pain arising from musculoskeletal trauma with Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score ≥ 3 were enrolled. Variables included NRS reduction, time variables, adverse effects, Ramsay Sedation Scores, and patient and paramedic satisfaction scores on a Likert scale.
RESULTS:
A total of 369 patients were enrolled into this study, but 26 patients were excluded due to missing data. The methoxyflurane arm had a shorter median time taken from arrival at the scene to drug administration (9.0 [interquartile range 6.0-14.0] minutes vs. 11.0 [interquartile range 8.0-15.0] minutes). For patients who achieved reduction in NRS ≥ 3 within 20 minutes, those in the methoxyflurane arm took a shorter time. However, the methoxyflurane (46.7%) arm experienced lower proportion of patients not achieving NRS reduction ≥ 3 when compared to the tramadol (71.6%) arm after over 20 minutes. The methoxyflurane arm had significantly higher paramedic and patient satisfaction scores.
CONCLUSION
For the doses of medication used in this implementation study, methoxyflurane was superior in efficacy, speed of onset and administration, but had more minor adverse effects when compared to IM tramadol.