The fracture of the axis arch is a rare uppercervical vertebrae fracture. It is easy to misdiag-nose. From 1971 to 1989, 7 cases of the fracturewere admitted to our hospital. Diagnoses were con-firmed by injury history, clinical features and X-ray films. The treatment results were as follows:six patients were in excellent condition and one pa-tient was in good one. The three following prob-lems were discussed: ①The mechanism of injury.②The misdiagnosis causes and its preventivemethods. ③Most patients can be treated conserva-tively and can be up. Only a few Type III fractureswill require operation after the failure of non-oper-ative treatment or at the time of conplicated injuryof the spinal cord occurring lately.

32 patients with old atlantoaxial dislocation with bulb-spinal cord compression were treated surgically from 1971 to 1989. Their diagnoses were confimed mainly by X-ray examination and measurement. The average time of follow-up after operation was 6 years. The rate fo excellence and good was 87.5% per cent. The causes of atlantoaxial dislocation, operative techniques involved and results are discussed. The authors think that the key to the increase of the therapeutic effects is early diagnosis and surgical treatment before the irreverisible changes of bulb-spinal cord compression occur.

BACKGROUND:Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament has become the gold-standard treatment for an anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Despite the popularity of the procedure, there remains a considerable amount of controversies over whether an autograft or anal ograft should be used for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. OBJECTIVE:To compare the clinical outcomes of al ograft and autograft in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. METHODS:Randomized control ed trials concerning autograft versus non-irradiated al ograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were identified from the PubMed/Medline database conducted up to July 12, 2014. These studies were selected independently by two reviewers according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was performed using Revman5.2 software. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:A total of 6 randomized control ed trials consisting of 858 cases were included, 441 cases in autograft group and 417 cases in non-irradiated al ograft. The results of the meta-analysis indicate no significant difference between autografts and non-irradiated al ografts in overal IKDC [relative risk (RR)=1.02, 95%confidence interval (CI) (0.99 to 1.06), P=0.21], degree of laxity [mean difference (MD)=-0.13, 95%CI (-0.29 to-0.02), P=0.09], Lachman test [RR=1.04, 95%CI (0.95 to 1.13), P=0.37], pivot shift test [RR=1.00, 95%CI (0.95 to 1.05), P=0.96], one-leg hop test [RR=1.01, 95%CI (0.96 to 1.06), P=0.77], Lysholm score [MD=-0.64, 95%CI (-1.45 to 0.17), P=0.12], Tegner score [MD=0.16, 95%CI (-0.16 to 0.47), P=0.34] and rate of postoperative complications [RR=1.42, 95%CI (0.67 to 3.04), P=0.36]. Therefore, in the meta-analysis, there is no significant difference between autograft and non-irradiated al ograft in clinical outcomes. However due to the limitations of our study, further work is needed to determine this conclusion.

BACKGROUND:Symptomatic treatment is the main management strategy for patients with knee osteoarthritis at early metaphase. Some previous studies have demonstrated that neuromuscular electrical stimulation can al eviate pain in knee osteoarthritis patients. To date, this effectiveness, however, stil remains controversial.
OBJECTIVE:To assess the efficacy of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
METHODRandomized control ed trials concerning the efficacy of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis were identified from the Medline database conducted up to July 3, 2014. These studies were selected independently by two reviewers according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was performed using Revman5.2 software.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:A total of 5 randomized control ed trials consisting of 239 participants were included. The results of the meta-analysis indicate neuromuscular electrical stimulation has no significant impact on measure of pain in knee osteoarthritis patients in comparison to the blank control group [mean difference=-0.40, 95%confidence interval (-1.34-0.54), P=0.40]. Owing to the sample limitations of our study, it is hard for us to draw a conclusion that the application of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in managing pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis is of little significance. Further work based on large-sample and high-quality randomized control ed trials is needed to determine the role of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in pain in this population.

In recent years, the increasingly frequent contact between humans and wild animals, coupled with the continuous mutation and evolution of pathogenic microorganisms, has led to a continuous increase and frequent outbreaks in emerging infectious diseases (EIDs), which has posed big threats and challenges to the global public health. On the occasion of the next outbreak of EIDs, it is hoped that the two major questions of ^"what is the pathogen^" and ^"where does the pathogen come from^" can be answered accurately and quickly through the rational use of relevant technical methods, so as to timely and effectively warn and control the outbreak of EIDs from the source. This article summarizes the pathogen identification and traceability analysis techniques of current emerging infectious diseases, and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of various technologies and their respective application fields.

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors with a poor prognosis. 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (4NQO) is a water-soluble quinoline derivative that can successfully induce the production of squamous cell carcinoma in vivo. Establishing and optimizing experimental methods for 4NQO induced ESCC formation in mice can provide a more suitable in situ model for the study of ESCC.

Objective:To observe the changes in acromiaohumeral distance(AHD) in patients undergoing the modified arthroscopic double-button Latarjet procedure for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation complicated with glenoid bone defect.Methods:A retrospective study was performed of the 52 patients who had undergone the modified arthroscopic double-button Latarjet procedure from October 2014 to October 2016 at Department of Sports Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital to Shenzhen University for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation complicated with glenoid bone defect. They were 33 males and 19 females, having 30 left and 22 right shoulders affected. Their ages ranged from 19 to 45 years(mean, 29.6 years). Their glenoid bone defects ranged from 17% to 30%(mean, 23.4%). CT scans were performed on the surgery side to observe the healing and reshaping of the bone grafts and to measure the AHDs of healthy shoulder, immediately, 6, 18 and 36 months after operation. Their American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons(ASES), Rowe and Walch-Duplay scores were recorded before operation and at the final follow-up for comparison.Results:The follow-up time for this series ranged from 37 to 44 months (mean, 40.6 months). The AHDs at immediate postoperation(9.6 mm ± 0.7 mm), 6 months postoperation(8.6 mm ± 0.9 mm), 18 months postoperation (8.0 cm ± 0.8 cm) and 36 months postoperation(7.9 cm ± 0.8 cm) were significantly wider than the healthy side value (7.8 mm ± 0.8 mm)( P<0.05). The ASES, Rowe and Walch-Duplay scores at the final follow-up (93.9±3.2, 94.5±2.7 and 95.7±3.6) were significantly improved than the preoperative values (67.3±9.1, 40.1±4.2 and 63.5±9.0) ( P<0.05). The final follow-ups observed no symptoms or signs of chronic shoulder pain, rotator cuff injury or acromion impingement. Conclusion:As the AHD becomes wider rather than narrower after arthroscopic double-button Latarjet procedure for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation complicated with glenoid bone defect, no subsequent rotator cuff injury may happen due to the uplift of the humeral head after the modified arthroscopic double-button Latarjet procedure.