Objective To review our surgical treatment experience and analyze the surgical methods and efficacy of Stanford type A acute aortic dissection in elderly patients.Methods We recruited 24 patients aged over 60 years with Stanford type A acute aortic dissection treated surgically with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest and selective cerebral perfusion from June 2013 to September 2016.Depending on the patients` conditions, we selected different surgical methods, including Bentall operation in 3 cases, David operation in 1 case, partial aortic arc replacement+Bentall operation in 3 cases, total aortic arch replacement+stented elephant trunk implantation technique+Bentall operation in 12 cases, total aortic arch replacement+stented elephant trunk implantation technique+ascending aorta replacement in 5 cases, and concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in 3 cases.Results Surgical operation was successful in all the 24 patients.The average CPB time of the all patients was (192.9±37.1)min, the aortic cross-clamp time was (120±28.72)min, deep lower temperature of cerebral perfusion time was (36.2±11.3)min, and operation time was (544.8±91.2)min.Soon after the operation, two patients died of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and renal failure complicated with infection, respectively.Postoperative complications included brain nerve dysfunction in 2 cases;renal insufficiency in 4 cases, which werelater treated with CRRT;pulmonary infection and tracheotomy in 3 cases;dysfunction in lower extremities in 1 case;hyoxemia in 3 cases;and incision infection in 2 cases.All the patients were followed up for 2-38 months, one patient was hospitalized because of hydropericardium and another one died of sudden death with unclear cause.Conclusion Surgical treatment of Stanford type A acute aortic dissection can obviously decrease the mortality and improve the quality of life.Total aortic arch replacement combined with transaortic stented graft implantation into the descending aorta is a classic clinical surgical treatment.Precise diagnosis, suitable surgical treatment and post-operative care are all important factors contributing to patients` recovery.

Objective To assess the CSCD-covered 7 journals of pediactrics.Methods The average number of refe rences,cited half life, H index, citation half life, self citation, IF, immediate index, self-cited rate of each paper pub-lished in 2013 in 7 journals of pediactric, covered in China Science and Technology Journal Citation Index Database, were divided into positive correlation group and negative correlation group.Their Spider Web maps were plotted.The papers published in the 7 journals of pediactrics were assessed.Results The top 3 journals, assessed according to the average number of references, IF, and immediate index, were Chinese Journal of Pediatrics,Chinese Journal of Prac-tical Pediatrics, and Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Pediatrics while the top 3 journals, assessed according to their citation half life , self citation, cited half life, and self cited rate, were Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Pe-diatrics,Chinese Journal of Pediatrics, and Journal of Clinical Pediatrics.Conclusion The academic level of the 7 journals of pediatrics is rather high.Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Pediatrics and Chinese Journal of Pediatrics have the highest assessment score.There is a large room for the other 4 journals to improve their academic level.