1.Endoscopic analysis of the ~(18)F-FDG accumulations in gastrointestinal tract after PET-CT examinations
Zhaozhen ZHANG ; Yiping HE ; Jun SHEN
China Oncology 2006;0(11):-
Background and purpose:The radio-labeled glucose analogue F-18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose(FDG) is the most widely used tracer in PET imaging,and its application in oncology has become one of the standard imaging modalities.But FDG uptake is not tumor specifi c.The aim of this paper was to study the endoscopic result with the patients of 18F-FDG accumulations in gastrointestinal tract after PET-CT examinations.Methods:Thirtythree patients with 18F-FDG accumulations in gastrointestinal tract were correlated with endoscopic and histopathologic results.Results:Of these,14 patients were harboring newly occurring cancers in gastrointestinal tract(esophagus cancer,2 patients;gastric cancer,5 patients;colorectal cancer,7 patients) .Eight patients were identified with precancerous lesions(adenoma,4 patients;hyperplastic polyp,1 patient;Barrett’s esophagus,1 patient;intestinal metaplasia of the gastric mucosa,2 patients) .Inflammatory lesions were detected in six patients(active colitis,5 patients;anastomotic leakage,1 patient) .In fi ve patients,PET/CT showed normal fi ndings in endoscopic examinations.The false positive rate of PET-CT was 33.33%(11/33) .Conclusion:Endoscopic result is important for patients of 18F-FDG accumulations in gastrointestinal patient.
2.Correlation of inositol level and glycolipid metabolism in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus
Zhaozhen LIU ; Sijia TANG ; Yulong ZHANG ; Yijun WU ; Sheng LIN ; Xiaomei WANG ; Shouzhen CHEN
Chinese Journal of Perinatal Medicine 2021;24(5):366-371
Objective:To investigate the correlation between inositol level and glycolipid metabolism in gravidas with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).Methods:A cross-sectional study was conducted on 80 GDM cases undergoing routine examination at Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital from November 2018 to August 2019, who were selected as GDM groups. Another 50 women with uncomplicated pregnancies during the same period were selected as the control group. Blood and urine inositol level and serum glycolipid profiles were compared between the two groups, and their association was analyzed. Independent or paired-sample t test, Mann-Whitney test, Chi-square (or Fisher's exact) test, and Pearson correlation test were performed for statistical analysis. Results:The serum inositol concentration and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol in the GDM group were significantly lower [322.1 ng/ml (279.1-364.1 ng/ml) vs 403.8 ng/ml (391.8-425.3 ng/ml), Z=-7.879; 1.8 mmol/L (1.5-2.0 mmol/L) vs 2.0 mmol/L (1.7-2.2 mmol/L), Z=-2.419; both P<0.05], while the concentration of urine inositol, lipoprotein-a (lipo-a), 0 h-, 1 h-, 2 h-oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) glucose, fasting insulin, and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were significantly higher when comparing to the control group [192.2 ng/ml (171.0-219.9 ng/ml) vs 143.8 ng/ml (121.1-158.6 ng/ml), Z=-6.834; 253.2 mg/L (65.0-349.0 mg/L) vs 148.5 mg/L(46.5-159.3 mg/L), Z=-0.187; 5.0 mmol/L (5.1-5.6 mmol/L) vs 4.4 mmol/L (4.2-4.6 mmol/L), Z=-5.547; 10.0 mmol/L (9.1-11.3 mmol/L) vs 7.8 mmol/L (7.0-8.4 mmol/L), Z=-6.987; 8.6 mmol/L(7.6-9.4 mmol/L) and 6.6 mmol/L (5.7-7.1 mmol/L), Z=-7.100; 18.2 mU/L(10.6-25.9 mU/L) vs 11.0 mU/L (6.3-12.7 mU/L), Z=-4.537; 5.4%(4.5%-5.5%) vs 5.1%(4.9%-5.4%), Z=-3.468; all P<0.05]. (2) Serum inositol concentration was negatively correlated with fasting insulin and 0 h-, 1 h-, 2 h- OGTT glucose level ( r=-0.386, -0.416, -0.350 and -0.407, respectively); urinary inositol concentration was positively correlated with 0 h-, 1 h-, 2 h-OGTT glucose levels ( r=0.402, 0.389 and 0.429, respectively) (all P<0.05). Conclusions:Serum inositol concentration was decreased, and urinary inositol excretion was increased in women with GDM. Measurement of changes in inositol levels during the second trimester may be helpful to assess the metabolic status of pregnant women.
3.The utility of high frequency endoscopic ultrasound mini probe for preoperative T-staging of gastric cancer
Zhaozhen ZHANG ; Yiping HE ; Jun SHEN ; Linghui XU ; Weiqi SHENG ; Yingqiang SHI
China Oncology 2010;20(1):44-49
Background and purpose: Currently endoscopic ultrasonography is clinically accepted for preoperative staging of gastric cancers. Endoscopic raucosai resection (EMR) and endoscopic subraucosal dissection (ESD) have been widely applied in the treatment of early gastric cancer. We need to improve the accuracy of pre-operative staging of gastric cancers, especially of early gastric cancers. This paper was to investigate the clinical significance of high frequency endoscopic ultrasound mini probe (UMP) in the preoperative T-staging of gastric cancer. Methods: Both UMP and MSCT were performed in 63 patients with pathologically proven gastric cancer frora Oct. 2008 to Apr.2009, and the results of UMP and MSCT were compared with surgical pathologic findings. Results: The accuracy of UMP and MSCT in T staging was 82.26% (51/62) and 88.71% (55/62) respectively, and there was no statistical difference (P>0.05). The accuracy of UMP and MSCT for early gastric cancer was 100.00% and 88.89% respectively.The accuracy of UMP and MSCT for advanced gastric cancer was 79.25% and 88.68% respectively. Conclusion: UMP appears to have a substantial diagnostic value for early stage gastric cancer. It is the approach of choice for superficial lesions.
4.Effect of continuous renal replacement therapy on plasma concentration, clinical efficacy and safety of colistin sulfate
Danyang PENG ; Fan ZHANG ; Zhaozhen LI ; Pin LYU ; Ziqi GUO ; Yinyin CHEN ; Jingge ZHAO ; Jingjing NIU ; Bo GUO ; Wenqing JIA ; Xiaofeng JIANG ; Xiaozhao LI ; Shaoyan QI ; Bingyu QIN ; Huanzhang SHAO
Chinese Critical Care Medicine 2023;35(1):88-92
Objective:To investigate the effects of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) on plasma concentration, clinical efficacy and safety of colistin sulfate.Methods:Clinical data of patients received with colistin sulfate were retrospectively analyzed from our group's previous clinical registration study, which was a prospective, multicenter observation study on the efficacy and pharmacokinetic characteristics of colistin sulfate in patients with severe infection in intensive care unit (ICU). According to whether patients received blood purification treatment, they were divided into CRRT group and non-CRRT group. Baseline data (gender, age, whether complicated with diabetes, chronic nervous system disease, etc), general data (infection of pathogens and sites, steady-state trough concentration, steady-state peak concentration, clinical efficacy, 28-day all-cause mortality, etc) and adverse event (renal injury, nervous system, skin pigmentation, etc) were collected from the two groups.Results:A total of 90 patients were enrolled, including 22 patients in the CRRT group and 68 patients in the non-CRRT group. ① There was no significant difference in gender, age, basic diseases, liver function, infection of pathogens and sites, colistin sulfate dose between the two groups. Compared with the non-CRRT group, the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) were higher in the CRRT group [APACHE Ⅱ: 21.77±8.26 vs. 18.01±6.34, P < 0.05; SOFA: 8.5 (7.8, 11.0) vs. 6.0 (4.0, 9.0), P < 0.01], serum creatinine level was higher [μmol/L: 162.0 (119.5, 210.5) vs. 72.0 (52.0, 117.0), P < 0.01]. ② Plasma concentration: there was no significant difference in steady-state trough concentration between CRRT group and non-CRRT group (mg/L: 0.58±0.30 vs. 0.64±0.25, P = 0.328), nor was there significant difference in steady-state peak concentration (mg/L: 1.02±0.37 vs. 1.18±0.45, P = 0.133). ③ Clinical efficacy: there was no significant difference in clinical response rate between CRRT group and non-CRRT group [68.2% (15/22) vs. 80.9% (55/68), P = 0.213]. ④ Safety: acute kidney injury occurred in 2 patients (2.9%) in the non-CRRT group. No obvious neurological symptoms and skin pigmentation were found in the two groups. Conclusions:CRRT had little effect on the elimination of colistin sulfate. Routine blood concentration monitoring (TDM) is warranted in patients received with CRRT.