Objective To study the mechanisms of nerve cell apoptosis after traumatic brain injury and the influences of CTP on rats after brain trauma. Methods The model of severe closed traumatic brain injury (TBI) was used. A total of 300 Wistar rats were divided randomly into TBI group, CTP treatment group, and sham operation group. The Fas protein expression and neural apoptosis in each group were observed at 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, 168, and 336 h after TBI. At the same time, the rest 12 rats were employed as the normal controls. Immunohistochemistry and TUNEL staining were used to observe the neural apoptosis and the expression of Fas protein in hippocampus of rats after TBI. Results Increased expression of Fas protein and neural apoptosis were found in the rat hippocampus after TBI. Conclusion The increased expression of Fas protein may result in neural apoptosis after TBI. CTP can reduce the expression of Fas protein and neural apoptosis.

Objective:To investigate and evaluate the mastery and recognition degree of Chinese clinicians on the 2015 edition of the Chinese Criteria for Diagnosis and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer in order to provide useful suggestions for updating and formulating diagnosis and treatment standards.Methods:Simple random sampling was used to conduct a questionnaire survey in 1500 colorectal cancer-related doctors in general hospitals and cancer hospitals from 115 cities in China. The study included the following guidelines: (1) Chinese Criteria for Diagnosis and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer (2015 edition); (2) Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology Colorectal Cancer Guidelines 2017 (CSCO 2017); (3) National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Colon Cancer Guidelines 2017.v1; (4) European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Rectal Cancer Guidelines. The survey was carried out in 2017 and 2019 respectively. In the first phase, the questionnaire included 4 dimensions (guideline cognition, detection and diagnosis, pathology and staging, treatment), and 1500 questionnaires were distributed. In the second phase, the questionnaire contained 3 dimensions (basic information, current treatment status of metastatic colorectal cancer, academic expectations), and 350 questionnaires were distributed. Case (%) was used to indicate the categorical variable data, and chi-square test was used for comparison between groups. P<0.05 indicated that the difference was statistically significant. Results:In the first phase, 1472 valid questionnaires were collected, and the questionnaire efficiency was 98.1% (1472/1500). In the second phase, 337 valid questionnaires were collected, and the questionnaire efficiency was 96.3% (337/350). In the survey of the first phase, doctors had some knowledge and compliance with various guidelines, but the most familiar one was the NCCN guidelines, accounting for 90.7% (1335/1472). In the dimension of detection and diagnosis, the overall correct rate was 64.1% (944/1472). The correct rate of doctors in the first-tier cities was 55.6% (148/266), which was lower than 59.1% (182/308) and 72.9% (369/506) in the second- and the third-tier cities, and the difference was statistically significant (χ 2=42.140, P<0.001). More than 60.0% (883/1472) of doctors was clear about the specification requirements of the staging evaluation and pathological examination. However, in terms of rectal cancer local staging evaluation, the ratio of doctors who would choose rectal MRI in the first-tier cities was lower than that of those in other tier cities [51.5% (137/266) vs. 65.6% (202/308), 63.2% (320/506) and 61.2% (240/392)], and the difference was statistically significant (χ 2=41.886, P<0.001). In the dimensions of staging evaluation and pathological examination, there were no statistically significant differences in cognition between general and specialist hospitals ( P>0.05). In the treatment dimension, 79.8% (1175/1472) of doctors considered the preoperative treatment as a necessary option for patients with middle and low locally advanced (over cT3) rectal cancer. 46.3% (681/1472) of doctors, including 60.3% (433/718) of surgeons, and 31.4% (225/716) of physicians, had a vague idea that irinotecan could not be used for postoperative adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer. In the survey of the second phase, 93.8% (316/337) of doctors approved potentially curative systemic (conversion) therapy, and 95.3% (321/337) of doctors followed the clinical guidelines in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Regarding academic expectations, the clinician's concern for surgery was more practical, and 79.2% (267/337) of doctors wanted to know the best options of conversion therapy for potentially curable metastatic colorectal cancer. In contrast, the clinician's concern for internal medicine was more exploratory, and 80.1% (270/337) of doctors focused on selecting targeted drugs and the sequence of treatment. Conclusions:This investigation has a preliminary understanding of the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer in China. (1) There are many guidelines for doctors' reference, but doctors' understanding of domestic guidelines is not as good as NCCN guidelines. (2) The degree of understanding of the guidelines varies significantly among doctors in different cities. (3) The promotion of guidelines should focus on basic concepts and theories. (4) The detection, diagnosis, and treatment of colorectal cancer should be better trained and promoted. (5) The concept of conversion therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer is highly recognized.

Objective:To investigate and evaluate the mastery and recognition degree of Chinese clinicians on the 2015 edition of the Chinese Criteria for Diagnosis and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer in order to provide useful suggestions for updating and formulating diagnosis and treatment standards.Methods:Simple random sampling was used to conduct a questionnaire survey in 1500 colorectal cancer-related doctors in general hospitals and cancer hospitals from 115 cities in China. The study included the following guidelines: (1) Chinese Criteria for Diagnosis and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer (2015 edition); (2) Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology Colorectal Cancer Guidelines 2017 (CSCO 2017); (3) National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Colon Cancer Guidelines 2017.v1; (4) European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Rectal Cancer Guidelines. The survey was carried out in 2017 and 2019 respectively. In the first phase, the questionnaire included 4 dimensions (guideline cognition, detection and diagnosis, pathology and staging, treatment), and 1500 questionnaires were distributed. In the second phase, the questionnaire contained 3 dimensions (basic information, current treatment status of metastatic colorectal cancer, academic expectations), and 350 questionnaires were distributed. Case (%) was used to indicate the categorical variable data, and chi-square test was used for comparison between groups. P<0.05 indicated that the difference was statistically significant. Results:In the first phase, 1472 valid questionnaires were collected, and the questionnaire efficiency was 98.1% (1472/1500). In the second phase, 337 valid questionnaires were collected, and the questionnaire efficiency was 96.3% (337/350). In the survey of the first phase, doctors had some knowledge and compliance with various guidelines, but the most familiar one was the NCCN guidelines, accounting for 90.7% (1335/1472). In the dimension of detection and diagnosis, the overall correct rate was 64.1% (944/1472). The correct rate of doctors in the first-tier cities was 55.6% (148/266), which was lower than 59.1% (182/308) and 72.9% (369/506) in the second- and the third-tier cities, and the difference was statistically significant (χ 2=42.140, P<0.001). More than 60.0% (883/1472) of doctors was clear about the specification requirements of the staging evaluation and pathological examination. However, in terms of rectal cancer local staging evaluation, the ratio of doctors who would choose rectal MRI in the first-tier cities was lower than that of those in other tier cities [51.5% (137/266) vs. 65.6% (202/308), 63.2% (320/506) and 61.2% (240/392)], and the difference was statistically significant (χ 2=41.886, P<0.001). In the dimensions of staging evaluation and pathological examination, there were no statistically significant differences in cognition between general and specialist hospitals ( P>0.05). In the treatment dimension, 79.8% (1175/1472) of doctors considered the preoperative treatment as a necessary option for patients with middle and low locally advanced (over cT3) rectal cancer. 46.3% (681/1472) of doctors, including 60.3% (433/718) of surgeons, and 31.4% (225/716) of physicians, had a vague idea that irinotecan could not be used for postoperative adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer. In the survey of the second phase, 93.8% (316/337) of doctors approved potentially curative systemic (conversion) therapy, and 95.3% (321/337) of doctors followed the clinical guidelines in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Regarding academic expectations, the clinician's concern for surgery was more practical, and 79.2% (267/337) of doctors wanted to know the best options of conversion therapy for potentially curable metastatic colorectal cancer. In contrast, the clinician's concern for internal medicine was more exploratory, and 80.1% (270/337) of doctors focused on selecting targeted drugs and the sequence of treatment. Conclusions:This investigation has a preliminary understanding of the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer in China. (1) There are many guidelines for doctors' reference, but doctors' understanding of domestic guidelines is not as good as NCCN guidelines. (2) The degree of understanding of the guidelines varies significantly among doctors in different cities. (3) The promotion of guidelines should focus on basic concepts and theories. (4) The detection, diagnosis, and treatment of colorectal cancer should be better trained and promoted. (5) The concept of conversion therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer is highly recognized.

OBJECTIVETo compare the perioperative safety and efficacy between hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery(HALS) and conventional open sigmoidectomy.

METHODSA total of 291 patients with sigmoid colon cancer who underwent surgery in our hospital from January 2010 to June 2013 were seperated into (HALS) group (n=200) and conventional open surgery (COS) group (n=91) with a non-randomized method. The perioperative safety and efficacy of two groups and perioperative outcomes were compared.

RESULTSThese two groups were comparable in operative time, lymph node harvest, and postoperative complications. However, HALS group had less intraoperative bleeding [(57.9±28.3) ml vs. (82.5±47.6) ml, P=0.000], shorter time to flatus [(3.0±1.4) d vs. (3.3±0.9) d, P=0.000], and shorter hospital stay [(7.3±4.2) d vs. (8.9±4.4) d, P=0.004]. There werer no significant differences in overall survival time and disease-free survival time between the two groups during 6 months to 3 years follow-up.

CONCLUSIONSHALS results in similar outcomes of conventional open surgery for sigmoidectomy with the advantage of minimal invasiveness.

Colectomy ; Disease-Free Survival ; Hand-Assisted Laparoscopy ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Lymph Nodes ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications ; Postoperative Period ; Prospective Studies ; Sigmoid Neoplasms ; Treatment Outcome

Objective To analyze the clinicopathological features of type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated with colorectal cancer (DCRC). Methods A case?control study was conducted. Inclusion criteria: (1) hospitalized patients receiving fibrocolonoscopy; (2) adenocarcinoma and mucinous adenocarcinoma diagnosed by pathology; (3) with preoperative cTNM clinical staging; (4) colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment; (5) with postoperative pTNM staging; (6) no smoking or drinking habits. Exclusion criteria: (1) familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP); (2) Lynch syndrome; (3) carcinoma of anal canal and perianal carcinoma; (4) multiple primary cancer; (5) with serious cardiocerebrovascular diseases or multiple organ failure. Clinicopathlogical data of 32 DCRC patients who were diagnosed and treated in Peking University Shougang Hospital from December 2017 to December 2018 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Forty nondiabetic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients during the same period were selected as control group according to the sex ratio and the age difference less than 5 years. Student′s t test and χ2 test were used to compare the difference between the two groups in baseline clinicopathological data, clinical test results, tumor markers and infiltration status of T cells in tumor immune microenvironment. Results Among 32 DCRC patients, 24 were males and 8 were females with a mean age of (63.0±1.7) years; among 40 CRC patients, 30 were males and 10 were females with a mean age of (60.5 ± 1.6) years. The duration of diabetes mellitus in DCRC patients (from the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus to the diagnosis of colorectal cancer) was (9.2±1.3) years. The body mass index (BMI) of DCRC group was significantly higher than that of CRC group [(24.8±0.6) kg/m2 vs. (23.2±0.4) kg/m2, t=2.372, P=0.020]. There were no significant differences in other baseline data (sex, age, primary site of tumor, R0 resection rate, pathological stage, pathological type, differentiation degree of tumor, preoperative intestinal obstruction) between the two groups (all P>0.05). Serum triglyceride level in DCRC group was higher than that in CRC group [(2.1 ± 0.2) mmol/L vs. (1.5 ± 0.1) mmol/L, t=3.085, P=0.003], while hemoglobin [(120.3±5.2) g/L vs. (132.7±2.8) g/L, t=-2.224, P=0.029], anti? thrombin III [(94.2±3.7)% vs. (103.5±2.4)%, t=-2.197, P=0.031], and red blood cell count [(4.2±0.1)×1012/L vs. (4.5±0.1)×1012L, t=-2.055, P=0.044] were all lower than those in CRC group. The preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level in DCRC group was higher than that in CRC group [(50.3±21.8) μg/L vs. (5.6±1.0) μg/L, t=2.339, P=0.022]. There were no significant differences in preoperative levels of other four tumor molecular markers (CA199, CA242, CA724 and CA125) between the two groups (all P>0.05). The expression of Foxp3 [specific markers of CD4+, CD25+ regulatory T cells (Treg)] in DCRC group was higher than that in CRC group [(82.7±6.2) cell/ HPF vs. (62.6±4.9) cell/HPF, t=2.586, P=0.012]. There were no significant differences in the infiltration of CD4, CD8, PD?1 and PD?L1 positive cells between two groups (all P>0.05).Conclusions The average diabetic history of DCRC patients is nearly 10 years. They have higher BMI and serum CEA level, and more Treg cell infiltration in the tumor. Close attention should be paid to these patients in clinical practice.

Objective To analyze the clinicopathological features of type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated with colorectal cancer (DCRC). Methods A case?control study was conducted. Inclusion criteria: (1) hospitalized patients receiving fibrocolonoscopy; (2) adenocarcinoma and mucinous adenocarcinoma diagnosed by pathology; (3) with preoperative cTNM clinical staging; (4) colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment; (5) with postoperative pTNM staging; (6) no smoking or drinking habits. Exclusion criteria: (1) familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP); (2) Lynch syndrome; (3) carcinoma of anal canal and perianal carcinoma; (4) multiple primary cancer; (5) with serious cardiocerebrovascular diseases or multiple organ failure. Clinicopathlogical data of 32 DCRC patients who were diagnosed and treated in Peking University Shougang Hospital from December 2017 to December 2018 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Forty nondiabetic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients during the same period were selected as control group according to the sex ratio and the age difference less than 5 years. Student′s t test and χ2 test were used to compare the difference between the two groups in baseline clinicopathological data, clinical test results, tumor markers and infiltration status of T cells in tumor immune microenvironment. Results Among 32 DCRC patients, 24 were males and 8 were females with a mean age of (63.0±1.7) years; among 40 CRC patients, 30 were males and 10 were females with a mean age of (60.5 ± 1.6) years. The duration of diabetes mellitus in DCRC patients (from the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus to the diagnosis of colorectal cancer) was (9.2±1.3) years. The body mass index (BMI) of DCRC group was significantly higher than that of CRC group [(24.8±0.6) kg/m2 vs. (23.2±0.4) kg/m2, t=2.372, P=0.020]. There were no significant differences in other baseline data (sex, age, primary site of tumor, R0 resection rate, pathological stage, pathological type, differentiation degree of tumor, preoperative intestinal obstruction) between the two groups (all P>0.05). Serum triglyceride level in DCRC group was higher than that in CRC group [(2.1 ± 0.2) mmol/L vs. (1.5 ± 0.1) mmol/L, t=3.085, P=0.003], while hemoglobin [(120.3±5.2) g/L vs. (132.7±2.8) g/L, t=-2.224, P=0.029], anti? thrombin III [(94.2±3.7)% vs. (103.5±2.4)%, t=-2.197, P=0.031], and red blood cell count [(4.2±0.1)×1012/L vs. (4.5±0.1)×1012L, t=-2.055, P=0.044] were all lower than those in CRC group. The preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level in DCRC group was higher than that in CRC group [(50.3±21.8) μg/L vs. (5.6±1.0) μg/L, t=2.339, P=0.022]. There were no significant differences in preoperative levels of other four tumor molecular markers (CA199, CA242, CA724 and CA125) between the two groups (all P>0.05). The expression of Foxp3 [specific markers of CD4+, CD25+ regulatory T cells (Treg)] in DCRC group was higher than that in CRC group [(82.7±6.2) cell/ HPF vs. (62.6±4.9) cell/HPF, t=2.586, P=0.012]. There were no significant differences in the infiltration of CD4, CD8, PD?1 and PD?L1 positive cells between two groups (all P>0.05).Conclusions The average diabetic history of DCRC patients is nearly 10 years. They have higher BMI and serum CEA level, and more Treg cell infiltration in the tumor. Close attention should be paid to these patients in clinical practice.

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sodium hyaluronate gel in preventing adhesion after prophylactic enterostomy.Methods:One hundred and twenty four patients from 6 hospitals were enrolled in this prospective multi-center randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized into the study group ( n=59) or the control group ( n=65).All patients underwent prophylactic enterostomy. Patients of study group received odium hyaluronate gel for adhesion-prevention,while those in control group did not receive any adhesion-prevention treatment. The incidence of moderate to severe adhesion around the incision in the stoma area were evalutated during stoma reduction surgery. Results:The incidence of moderate to severe adhesion around the incision in the stoma area was 6.3% in the study group, the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05) compared to that of the control group (32.6%). Conclusion:Sodium hyaluronate gel can safely and effectively reduce the incidence of moderate and severe adhesions after abdominal surgery.

Objective:To understand the treatment status and effects on colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in China during the COVID-19 pandemic, and provide evidence for decision-making for health-care workers.Methods:The method of cross-sectional study was applied. A questionnaire survey of CRC patients in China was carried out. Their basic and treatment information during the COVID-19 were collected and associated effects on treatment, nursing, state of psychology and needs of social support were analyzed.Results:Of the 1147 participants in the study, 635 (55.4%) were male and 512 (44.6%) were female with mean age of (52.8±12.8) years. The treatment or follow up of 896 (78.1%) CRC patients were affected during the COVID-19 outbreak. A total of 253 patients (22.1%) had their treatment regiments changed, of whom 141 (12.3%) had their chemotherapy regiments postponed or changed, and 83 patients (7.2%) had their surgical treatment affected. Among the above 83 patients, 39 patients (3.4%) underwent emergency surgery. A total of 277 patients (24.1%) had their out-of-hospital care needs affected, mainly due to maintenance of PICC (49.5%, 137/277). CRC patients had poorer sleep quality and increased levels of insomnia than before ( P<0.001), and were more distressed, anxious, depressed, and angry than they were before. They presented the more requirements of help ( P<0.001). In addition, 376 patients (32.8%) had received telemedicine services, but only 36.4% (137/376) of them were satisfied. Conclusions:The COVID-19 epidemic has effect on the integrated treatment of CRC patients include diagnosis, treatment, examination and prognosis. While protecting CRC patients from being infected with SARS-CoV-2, health-care workers should also actively help them to receive timely and correct treatment and pay attention to their nursing, nutritional, psychological and social support needs in the COVID-19 epidemic.

Objective:To understand the treatment status and effects on colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in China during the COVID-19 pandemic, and provide evidence for decision-making for health-care workers.Methods:The method of cross-sectional study was applied. A questionnaire survey of CRC patients in China was carried out. Their basic and treatment information during the COVID-19 were collected and associated effects on treatment, nursing, state of psychology and needs of social support were analyzed.Results:Of the 1147 participants in the study, 635 (55.4%) were male and 512 (44.6%) were female with mean age of (52.8±12.8) years. The treatment or follow up of 896 (78.1%) CRC patients were affected during the COVID-19 outbreak. A total of 253 patients (22.1%) had their treatment regiments changed, of whom 141 (12.3%) had their chemotherapy regiments postponed or changed, and 83 patients (7.2%) had their surgical treatment affected. Among the above 83 patients, 39 patients (3.4%) underwent emergency surgery. A total of 277 patients (24.1%) had their out-of-hospital care needs affected, mainly due to maintenance of PICC (49.5%, 137/277). CRC patients had poorer sleep quality and increased levels of insomnia than before ( P<0.001), and were more distressed, anxious, depressed, and angry than they were before. They presented the more requirements of help ( P<0.001). In addition, 376 patients (32.8%) had received telemedicine services, but only 36.4% (137/376) of them were satisfied. Conclusions:The COVID-19 epidemic has effect on the integrated treatment of CRC patients include diagnosis, treatment, examination and prognosis. While protecting CRC patients from being infected with SARS-CoV-2, health-care workers should also actively help them to receive timely and correct treatment and pay attention to their nursing, nutritional, psychological and social support needs in the COVID-19 epidemic.

Objective To compare the perioperative safety and efficacy between hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) and conventional open sigmoidectomy. Methods A total of 291 patients with sigmoid colon cancer who underwent surgery in our hospital from January 2010 to June 2013 were seperated into (HALS) group (n=200) and conventional open surgery (COS) group (n=91) with a non-randomized method. The perioperative safety and efficacy of two groups and perioperative outcomes were compared. Results These two groups were comparable in operative time, lymph node harvest, and postoperative complications. However, HALS group had less intraoperative bleeding [(57.9±28.3) ml vs. (82.5±47.6) ml, P=0.000], shorter time to flatus[(3.0±1.4) d vs. (3.3±0.9) d, P=0.000], and shorter hospital stay[(7.3±4.2) d vs. (8.9±4.4) d, P=0.004]. There werer no significant differences in overall survival time and disease-free survival time between the two groups during 6 months to 3 years follow-up. Conclusions HALS results in similar outcomes of conventional open surgery for sigmoidectomy with the advantage of minimal invasiveness.