Objective:To evaluate and compare the outcomes of maxillary protraction treatment assisted by temporary anchorage devices (TADs) and removable biteplate in cleft lip and palate patients using cephalometric analysis.Methods:Fifty-four cleft lip and palate patients were divided into 3 groups based on different maxillary protraction treatments: bitepalate removable appliance group (group A), maxillary protraction treatment assisted by TADs group (group B) and control group (group C). Lateral cephalograms were taken at the start and the end of maxillary protraction. Skeletal, dental and soft tissue changes were measured using Dolphin software and compared between groups.Results:The average protraction time of groups A and B were (8.51±1.33) and (9.20±1.45) months ( P=0.146), respectively. A point moved forward by 4.08 mm in group A and 4.83 mm in group B were noted, without significant differences between the two groups. Compared to group C, ANB and wits was highly improved after protraction in groups A and B. U6-VRmx increased by 0.46 mm and U1-pp increased by 0.63 mm in group B, both of which were significantly smaller than those of group A (both P<0.05), suggesting that maxillary protraction treatment assisted by TADs could reduce molar advancement and upper incisor protrusion. Conclusions:Both maxillary protraction treatment assisted by TADs and removable biteplate could significantly improve skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion in unilateral cleft and palate patients. Maxillary protraction treatment assisted by TADs could reduce molar advancement and upper incisor protrusion.