OBJECTIVE To explore the merging methods and influencing factors of health state disutility values estimation. METHODS Retrieved from 6 Chinese and English databases such as CNKI and PubMed ，the literatures about disutility values of diarrhea caused by antitumor drugs were collected from the inception to July 2021. After 2 researchers independently screened the literature，extracted the data ，assessed the quality ，the Meta-analysis and regression analysis were conducted using Stata 16.0 software. RESULTS Fifteen literatures were included. The results of Meta-analysis showed that diarrhea caused by antitumor drugs had a significant impact on health utility [ MD＝－0.26，95％CI（－0.30，－0.22），P＜0.05]. The results of subgroup analysis showed that the disutility values of the 3 types of negative value ，non-negative value changed into negative value ，and non-negative value combined with basic state changed into to negative value were MD ＝－0.14，95％CI（－0.19，－0.09）；MD＝－0.46，95％CI （－0.56，－0.36）；MD＝－0.12，95％CI（－0.20，－0.05），respectively. Meta regression results showed that the year of publication ， survey country/region ，severity of adverse events ，basic state settings ，utility estimation tools ，utility report types ，and utility statistical methods significantly affected the value of diarrhea disutility （P＜0.05）. CONCLUSIONS Disutility values for treatment-related symptoms or complications should be fully considered when inputting the parameters to the economic evaluation model. In the study or application of disutility values ，the types of utility reports should be distiguished ，and the core influencing factors such as the investigation country or region ，the severity of symptoms or complications ，and whether the basic state is set should be focus on.

OBJECTIVE To provide methodology re ference for conducting health state disutility estimation and calculating health output in pharmacoeconomic evaluation. METHODS Literatures about health state disutility estimation of malignant tumor drugs-related adverse events were retrieved from 3 Chinese databases such as CNKI ，Wanfang database and VIP and 3 English database such as PubMed ，Web of Science and the Cochrane Library from inception to July 2021. After 2 researchers independently screened the literature and extracted the data ，qualitative analysis was conducted. The modified decision-making technical support documents of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence were used for quality evaluation. The practice and existing problems of health state disutility measurement were summarized to put forward some suggestions. RESULTS A total of 77 literatures were included. The first literature was published in 1991，and the number of publications increased in a fluctuating manner. 77 literatures involved 120 kinds of adverse events ，mainly utility studies （49，63.64％），only 3 （3.90％） were investigated in China. A total of 35 literatures（45.45％）had no statement of study design type ，48（62.34％）had no statement of health status development method ，52（67.53％）had no statement of health status verification method ，46（59.74％）set and explained the basic health status ，and 20（25.97％）were ranked for the health status . The utility measurement tools used were mainly the standard game method and the European five-dimensional health scale （23 literatures each ，accounting for 29.87％）. The research objects of 45 literatures（58.44％）were patients ，and 63（81.82％）did not specify the representative test of the population. Utility report types included negative value ，non-negative value and non-negative value of consolidated basic status. A total of 45 literatures（58.44％）had no statement of statistical method of utility. Overall quality score of included studies was 0.683. CONCLUSIONS The current disutility estimation include 4 key links of basic study design ， health status confirmation， utility estimation survey and survey data E-mail：luyuqiong96@foxmail.com statistics. The deficiencies of related studies are the lack of data based on the Chinese population ，the inconsistent type ofresult reporting ，and the incomplete report of measurement- related critical items. It is recommended to standardize the basic implementation path of disutility estimation ，formulate guidelines for health status utility value estimation ，and strengthen multidisciplinary cooperation so as to improve the quality of health status utility value estimation .

OBJECTIVE：To provide reference for improving medical insurance reimbursement for multi-indication drugs based on value-based pricing in China. METHODS：The theory and practice of value-based pricing for multi-indication drugs were sorted out，and the value standards and medical insurance reimbursement strategies based on value-based pricing in France，Germany，UK，Italy and Sweden were analyzed，so as to provide the suggestions for medical insurance reimbursement of multi-indication drugs in China. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS：The realization of value-based pricing first needed to develop a value framework to define，measure and integrate value，and then established a model to convert the total value into price. The overall idea of value-based pricing for multi-indication drugs was consistent，but there were differences in the value standard. In the UK and Sweden， quality-adjusted life years （QALYs） and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios （ICERs） measured by pharmacoeconomicsare used as the value standard. France，Germany and Italy were more focused on the therapeutic value and clinical benefit improvement. As for medical insurance reimbursement strategies，France adopted single weighting method based on expected volume. Germany adopted combination weighting method based on value and volume. UK introduced the Patient Access Schemes and Italy introduced the Managed Entry reements，both based on the nominal reimbursement standard. Sweden adopted independent reimbursement for different indications by different brand names. It is suggested that China can explore the value-based pricing strategies of multi-indication drugs on the basis of the above international experiences，reference and use these variety of medical insurance reimbursement strategies comprehensively. Simultaneously，the information collection mechanism of patients and drug use should be improved to provide data support for the implementation of China’s value-based pricing and reimbursement strategies for multi-indication drugs.

OBJECTIVE To learn the practical experience of medical insurance payment standards adjustment in Japan and South Korea， which will serve as a reference for the improvement of simple renewal mechanism in China. METHODS Retrieving relevant literature from CNKI and related policy documents from official websites of Japan and South Korea， the medical insurance payment standards adjustment practice in Japan and South Korea would be elucidated from 2 perspectives of adjustment criteria and formulas， and then were compared with the current simple renewal mechanism in China to clarify the areas where simple renewal mechanism in China can be optimized and propose several suggestions. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS In terms of adjustment methods， Japan and South Korea were similar to China. For excessive drugs， the reduction rate of drugs was calculated based on the situation of excess and adjustments were implemented； however， there were differences in the specific adjustment criteria and formulas. Japan and South Korea adopted a linear price reduction approach for drugs with significant oversupply， while China adopted a gradient price reduction approach for drugs with both current and expected oversupply. The results of the comparative analysis show that China has initially established simple renewal mechanisms that are in line with the national conditions and the actual medical insurance situation， and has taken some innovative measures， including considering the current and expected oversupply of drugs and introducing a halving mechanism in the adjustment formula. However， there are also certain shortcomings， such as a relatively single set of indicators for adjusting conditions and a too broad range of gradient price reduction in adjustment formulas， which fail to fully reflect the market-oriented mechanism of “volume for price”. It is recommended that China’s medical insurance department increase consideration of drug fund expenditures， refine the gradient price reduction range of adjustment formulas， increase policy preferences for special category drugs when adding new indications， and further improve the mechanism for simple renewal.