Objective To discuss the application value of the peritoneal catheter via pneumoperitoneum puncturation in cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) peritoneal shunt surgery. Methods The clinical data of 490 hydrocephalus patients admitted to Zhejiang Provincial Tongde Hospital from June 2002 to December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed, among them 147 cases accepted ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) operation from June 2002 to January 2009 were assigned as a control group (open abdomenal catheterization group), and 343 cases accepted pneumoperitoneum puncturation from February 2009 to December 2016 were arranged as an observation group (abdominal paracentesis group). The patients in the abdominal paracentesis group were further subdivided into a VPS group (228 cases) and a lumboperitoneal shunt (LPS) group (115 group) according to different ways of catheterization. The clinical data such as infection, shunt obstruction (blockage), bleeding and other complications (such as insufficient or excessive drainage, bleeding, epilepsy, intestinal obstruction) 6 mouths after operation were collected in open catheterization group and abdominal paracentesis group, the difference of incidences of complication in each group were compared. Results The incidences of infection [10.20% (15/147) vs. 3.79% (13/343)], shunt obstruction [14.29% (21/147) vs. 7.58% (26/343)], other complications [23.13% (34/147) vs. 10.79% (37/343)] in open catheterization group were significantly higher than those in abdominal paracentesis group (all P < 0.05); the rate of shunt obstruction in VPS group was higher than that in LPS group [9.65% (22/228) vs. 3.48% (4/115), P < 0.05]. Conclusions Pneumoperitoneum puncturation is a simple, safe, minimally invasive technique to implant an abdominal cavity shunt catheter in CSF peritoneal shunt surgery, and it can effectively reduce the rates of infection and shunt blockage; LPS is more effective than VPS in reducing the incidence of the blockage by this paracentesis method.

This article discusses the overview of virtual reality (VR) technology and chronic pain kinesiophobia, elucidating the principles by which VR technology reduces chronic pain kinesiophobia and its effectiveness in the treatment and rehabilitation training of patients with this condition. The advantages and limitations of VR technology are summarized, aiming to provide references for clinical practitioners to better apply VR technology in the treatment and rehabilitation management of chronic pain kinesiophobia. The goal is to improve patients' fear of movement, fear-avoidance beliefs, pain related to movement injuries, physical function, motivation for training, and patient satisfaction.