Objective:To evaluate the effectiveness of low-dose of prophylactic indomethacin in reducing the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) in elderly patients.Methods:From July 2021 to October 2022, patients undergoing ERCP in Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University and Shanghai Xuhui District Central Hospital were enrolled prospectively and assigned to either the low-dose (50 mg) indomethacin group or the conventional-dose (100 mg) group using the DAS electronic central randomization system. Data from elderly patients aged≥60 were collected and compared for the incidence of PEP and other adverse reactions.Results:A total of 418 elderly patients (Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, n=122; Shanghai Xuhui Distric Central Hospital, n=296) were ultimately included in the study, with 201 in the low-dose group and 217 in the conventional-dose group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of PEP between the low-dose group and the conventional-dose group [5.97% (12/201) VS 7.37% (16/217), χ2=0.33, P=0.566]. There was also no significant difference in drug-related adverse events between the two groups [4.98% (10/201) VS 4.15% (9/217), χ2=0.16, P=0.685]. Further subgroup analysis revealed that among elderly patients aged 60-<70, there were 13 patients diagnosed as having PEP. The incidence of PEP between the low-dose group and the conventional-dose group was not statistically significant [6.19% (6/97) VS 6.60% (7/106), χ2=0.01, P=0.903], and the occurrence of drug-related adverse events between the two groups was not statistically significant [6.19% (6/97) VS 2.83% (3/106), P=0.315]. Among elderly patients aged≥70, there were 15 patients diagnosed as having PEP. The incidence of PEP between the low-dose group and the conventional-dose group was not statistically significant [5.77% (6/104) VS 8.11% (9/111), χ2=0.45, P=0.501], and the occurrence of drug-related adverse events between the two groups was not statistically significant [3.85% (4/104) VS 5.41% (6/111), P=0.749]. Conclusion:The prophylactic use of 50 mg indomethacin showed similar efficacy in reducing the incidence of PEP in elderly patients compared with 100 mg indomethacin. Therefore, elderly patients can use 50 mg indomethacin prophylactically to reduce the incidence of PEP.

[Objective] To explore the clinical significance and application value of establishing a database for red blood cell alloantibody detection. [Methods] Patients who were scheduled for blood transfusion in our hospital from January 1, 2020 to May 1, 2024 were selected as the research subjects. A red blood cell alloantibody detection database was established using Microsoft Office Excel software to register the detection data of patients' alloantibodies and antibodies of undetermined specificity (AUS). A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical characteristics, antibody distribution, antibody decay and repeat positivity of the patients in the database. The LISS-IAT method was routinely used for antibody screening and identification. [Results] Among the alloantibodies, the Rh blood group system had the highest detection rate, followed by antibodies of the MNS blood group system and the Lewis blood group system. The predominant antibody in the Rh blood group system was anti-E. In the univariate analysis, the positivity of antibody was significantly associated with the patient's gender, age, blood transfusion history, pregnancy history and type of disease (all P<0.001). In the database, 48 patients experienced antibody decay, accounting for 15.24%(48/315), with an average time span of antibody decay ranging from 22 to 1 324 days. Six cases showed repeat positivity after decay, which were related to blood transfusions. The shortest interval between blood transfusions that led to antibody repeat positivity was 3 days, and the longest interval was 427 days. Among 58 cases with AUS, 3 converted into alloantibodies, among which 2 were anti-E and 1 was anti-Lea. [Conclusion] Establishing a red blood cell alloantibody detection database is an effective way to guide ambiguous cross-matching in clinical practice and is also an effective measure for the management of transfusion risks.