Objective To analyze the total cost and clinical effectiveness of internal fixation and hemiar-throplasty in the treatment of femoral neck fracture for the elderly. Methods From October 2013 to May 2015,85 patients above 60-year old who were diagnosed as displaced femoral neck fracture and received operation in our hospital. All the patients were divided into internal fixation(IF)group and hemiarthroplasty(HA)group respec-tively. There were 40 cases in the IF group and 45 cases in the HA group. The total cost associated with fracture in a year was collected by medical record ,telephone interview and standard methods. At the last follow-up ,we ap-plied Harris scores to evaluate the clinical outcome for each group. Results All the patients completed the operation successfully. During 1 year follow-up the total cost in the IF group was less than that in the HA group including higher primary hospitalization cost and less post-discharge cost. The total cost was 44,556.1 Yuan in the IF group and 72,198.0 Yuan in the HA group respectively. The data showed that the total cost of HA was 1.6 times higher than that of IF. At the last follow-up the mean Harris scores was 71.1 ± 12.1 in the IF group and 74.3 ± 10.3 in the HA group while the EQ-5D index was 0.74 ± 0.15 and 0.76 ± 0.13 respectively which showed no significant differ-ence(P > 0.05). Conclusions Both internal fixation and hemiarthroplasty have effective treatment for elderly pa-tients with femoral neck fracture. Compared to hemiarthroplasty IF can provide similar clinical effectiveness with less total cost. Therefore IF may contribute to decrease the economic burden for elderly patients in China.

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of ankle arthroscopy combined with closed reduction guide and conventional surgical incision in the treatment of trimalleolar fracture.Methods A total of 60 patients with ankle fracture were divided into two groups according to different surgical plans:the ankle arthroscopy combined with closed reduction guide surgery group(arthroscopy group)and the conventional incision surgery group(incision group),with 30 cases in each group.The operative time,intraoperative blood loss and complications of the two groups were observed and compared.Pain and functional recovery of patients were evaluated by the American Orthopaedic Foot&Ankle Society(AOFAS)ankle and hind foot scores and Foot and Ankle Disability Index(FADI)scores.Results All 60 patients were followed up.Compared with the arthroscopy group,patients in the incision group had a longer surgical time,a shorter incision length in the medial malleolus,a reduced number of cases of skin numbness and reduced bleeding(P＜0.05).The AOFAS score and the FADI score at 12 months after surgery were higher in the arthroscopic group than those of the incision group(P＜0.05).After 12 months of surgery,the AOFAS score in patients without cartilage injury of the arthroscopic group were higher than those of patients with cartilage injury(P＜0.05),while there were no significant differences in pain and force line scores between patients with cartilage injury and patients without cartilage injury(P＞0.05).Conclusion The application of ankle arthroscopy combined with closed reduction guide in the treatment of trimalleolar fracture can achieve better postoperative results,but it has no obvious advantages in operation time and incision infection compared with the incision surgery.