Objective To systematically evaluate the measurement properties and methodological quality of the palliative quality assessment tools based on the cancer patient experiences,and to provide an evidence-based basis for the selection of a high-quality assessment tool for healthcare professionals.Methods Systematic search of PubMed,Embase,Web of Science,CINAHL,CNKI,Wanfang database,VIP database,and China Biomedical Literature database for studies related to the evaluation of the measurement properties of the self-report palliative care quality assessment tools for cancer patients.The search period from the date of creation to December 10,2023.There are 2 researchers who independently conducted literature screening and data extraction according to the COSMIN selection criteria,and used the COSMIN Risk of Bias Inventory and Quality Criteria Scale to measure the academic characteristics and form the final recommendations.Results A total of 19 studies involving 8 assessment tools for cancer patients were included.The final 6 assessment tools were recommended at level B.2 assessment tools are recommended at level A.Conclusion The SF-QCQ-PC and the Self-Report Palliative Care Quality Assessment Tool for Terminal Cancer Patients can be provisionally recommended.However,further validation of its measurement properties is still needed.

Objective:To develop a specialized clival-cervical plate fixation (CCPF) for anterior surgery to treat craniovertebral instability, and to compare it with a posterior occipitocervical fixation (POCF) in biomechanical validation.Methods:Based on the measurement of 40 adult dry bones and 30 volunteers CT images, the clival-cervical plate was designed and manufactured. 8 cadaveric specimens (occiput-C 3) were tested in five conditions including the intact status, the intact+CCPF status, the injury status, the injury+CCPF status, and the injury+POCF status. Specimens were applied a pure moment of 1.5 N·m in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Calculating and comparing the range of motion (ROM) and neutral zone (NZ) for the occiput to C 2. The effects of different fixation methods on the distribution of ROMs at the occipitocervical region were compared. Results:The injury+CCPF status constrained ROMs to 1.7° in flexion ( q=4.68, P=0.055) , 1.2° in extension ( q=0.39, P=0.9922) , 2.8° in lateral bending ( q=1.25, P=0.814) , and 4.3° in axial rotation ( q=5.08, P=0.035) , resulted in larger ROM in axial rotation but similar ROMs in other directions ( P>0.05) when compared with the injury+POCF status. There were no significant differences between the above two fixation methods in flexion-extension ( q=1.94, P=0.554) , lateral bending ( q=1.79, P=0.611) and axial rotation ( q=2.14, P=0.478) for the NZs. For the flexion, extension,lateral bendingand axial rotation direction, the proportion of the C 1, 2 ROM to the overall ROM was 28%, 25%, 34% and 56% respectively in the injury+CCPF status, and it was 59%, 53%, 42% and 71% respectively in the injury+POCF status. Conclusion:CCPF is a biomechanically effective alternative or supplemental method of POCF for the craniocervical instability.