1.A case of tympanic foreign body.
Wei CHEN ; Zaixia WANG ; Juan HUANG
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2013;27(1):50-50
A 22 years old male was hospitalized with 1 month history of endaural foreign body retention at 7th May, 2011. Patient complained an invicible bug was placed into right outer ear canal. The foreign body could not be taken out because of the intoleration to pain under the local anesthesia, and major symptoms were swell-sore, fullness, and obvious hearing loss. Physical examination showed congestion and swelling in right ear canal, and only 3mm diameter for the stenosis ear canal. The incrustation make the invicible foreign body and the tympanic membrane. CT showed the foreign body retention near tympanic membrane left ear was normal. After hospitalization, the patient received an exploratory operation under the general anesthesia. The foreign body incarceration was found near the tympanic ring which in the tympanic cavity.
Ear, Middle
;
Foreign Bodies
;
etiology
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Young Adult
2. Nursing experience of early rehabilitation health management for hypertensive patients with hemiplegia after cerebral infarction
Zaixia ZHOU ; Xue′e ZHANG ; Hua YUE ; Qian WANG ; Linlin ZHAO
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing 2020;36(6):419-423
Objective:
To analyze the nursing methods and effects of early rehabilitation and health management for hypertensive patients with cerebral infarction and hemiplegia.
Methods:
Totally 86 patients with hypertension and cerebral infarction with hemiplegia were randomized to a random number table, with 43 patients in each group. The control group received routine nursing, and the observation group underwent early rehabilitation health management care, and the recovery of the two groups was compared.
Results:
After treatment, the patient medical research committee score (MRC) in the observation group was (50.25±3.37) points, higher than the control group (40.28±3.38) points, and the Fugl-Meyer score (upper limb) of the observation was (65.44 ± 1.08) points, which was higher than that of the control group (53.38 ±1.22) points, and the Fugl-Meyer score (lower limb) was (28.15±1.13) points, significantly higher than the control group (26.52±1.17) points, the living activity ability Barthel index (88.65±4.73) was significantly higher than the control group (80.27 ±4.69)(