Although influenza is a highly contagious acute respiratory illness of global importance, little is known about the disease in tropical countries. An influenza survey was conducted in three sentinel sites in Yangon, Myanmar from September 2003 to December 2004. Throat or nasal swabs were collected from 616 patients with influenza-like symptoms and tested using rapid diagnostic test kits and virus isolation. Influenza B virus was detected in 6 patients from September to October, 2003. Influenza A viruses were detected in 133 patients from June to September, 2004, and the 51 influenza A viruses isolated from 72 specimens were all A⁄H3N2. Influenza virus infections occurred mainly in the rainy season in Yangon, Myanmar, but continuous ongoing influenza surveillance is needed.

Background: The technique of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) has evolved, and artery first’ approach was considered for the intraoperative early determination of resectability for borderline resectable cases before the ‘point of no return’ and avoidance of blood congestion resulted in the reduction of blood loss. Also, active application of energy device was useful for the reduced operative time and blood loss. Recently, 3D simulation for hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery has been useful and mandatory. In this presentation, we introduced our recent refinements and advances for PD. ‘Artery first’ approach and vessel sealing system for PD: ‘Artery first’ approach were considered as six different methods as follows; 1) Superior approach, 2) Anterior approach, 3) Posterior approach, 4) Left posterior approach, 5) Right/ medial uncinate approach and 6) Mesenteric approach. A while ago, we preferably applied the mesenteric approach to PD, and also the combination of this approach with vessel sealing system (VSS) significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss (Mesenteric approach with VSS, n=21 vs. non-‘Artery first’ approach without VSS, n=78; 320±174ml vs. 486±263ml, p<0.01). Modified de-rotation method as complete ‘Artery first’ approach: Most recently, for further refinement of operative procedure, we refined a right/medial uncinate and posterior approach as modified de-rotation method. Point of view in this method was the complete clockwise rotation of small intestinal mesentery including ascending colon, in order to linearize from duodenum to jejunum and look at the direct front of superior mesenteric artery (SMA), vein (SMV) and some branched jejunal vessels originated from SMA and SMV (Fig.). Thereby, in the posterior view, the easy dissection of all pancreatic branch originated from SMA can be done. This modified de-rotation method was possible to achieve the complete ‘Artery first’ approach. Preoperative 3D simulation of arterial and venous anatomy: Until now, we applied 3D volumetery software (SYNAPSE VINCENT®) as preoperative simulation for hepatic resection. And recently, for evaluation of the position relationship between arteries and veins surround pancreas head, we adopted this software before PD. As first step, arteries and veins are automatically identified, and small vessels are manually traced on the axial CT view. After that, 3D arterial and venous simulations are combined. Grasp of detailed vessel anatomy and its relationship using preoperative 3D simulation enable to safely perform PD, even in young surgeons (operative time; young 512±49 vs. senior 445±41 min, p<0.01), (blood loss; young 353±203 vs. senior 246±109 ml, p=0.16). Conclusion: Those refinements and advances are possible to safely and easily perform pancreatoduodenectomy.

Background: The technique of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) has evolved, andartery first’ approach was considered for the intraoperative early determinationof resectability for borderline resectable cases before the ‘point of no return’and avoidance of blood congestion resulted in the reduction of blood loss. Also,active application of energy device was useful for the reduced operative time andblood loss. Recently, 3D simulation for hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery has beenuseful and mandatory. In this presentation, we introduced our recent refinementsand advances for PD.‘Artery first’ approach and vessel sealing system for PD: ‘Artery first’ approachwere considered as six different methods as follows; 1) Superior approach, 2)Anterior approach, 3) Posterior approach, 4) Left posterior approach, 5) Right/medial uncinate approach and 6) Mesenteric approach. A while ago, wepreferably applied the mesenteric approach to PD, and also the combination ofthis approach with vessel sealing system (VSS) significantly reduced intraoperativeblood loss (Mesenteric approach with VSS, n=21 vs. non-‘Artery first’ approachwithout VSS, n=78; 320±174ml vs. 486±263ml, p<0.01).Modified de-rotation method as complete ‘Artery first’ approach: Most recently,for further refinement of operative procedure, we refined a right/medial uncinateand posterior approach as modified de-rotation method. Point of view in thismethod was the complete clockwise rotation of small intestinal mesenteryincluding ascending colon, in order to linearize from duodenum to jejunumand look at the direct front of superior mesenteric artery (SMA), vein (SMV) andsome branched jejunal vessels originated from SMA and SMV (Fig.). Thereby, inthe posterior view, the easy dissection of all pancreatic branch originated fromSMA can be done. This modified de-rotation method was possible to achieve thecomplete ‘Artery first’ approach.Preoperative 3D simulation of arterial and venous anatomy:Until now, we applied 3D volumetery software (SYNAPSE VINCENT®) aspreoperative simulation for hepatic resection. And recently, for evaluation of theposition relationship between arteries and veins surround pancreas head, weadopted this software before PD. As first step, arteries and veins are automaticallyidentified, and small vessels are manually traced on the axial CT view. Afterthat, 3D arterial and venous simulations are combined. Grasp of detailed vesselanatomy and its relationship using preoperative 3D simulation enable to safelyperform PD, even in young surgeons (operative time; young 512±49 vs. senior445±41 min, p<0.01), (blood loss; young 353±203 vs. senior 246±109 ml,p=0.16).Conclusion: Those refinements and advances are possible to safely and easilyperform pancreatoduodenectomy.

75-year-old man had the right lower lobe resected because of pulmonary adenocarcinoma (stage IIB) and received 4 courses of postoperative chemotherapy 4 years earlier. Thereafter, he continued to complain of cough, sputum, and progressive exertional breathlessness. The preoperative chest CT showed ground glass opacity (GGO) at the bottom of both lung fields, and over time the GGO changed to honeycombing with traction bronchiectasis. He was administered prednisolone, clarithromycin, and pirfenidone but with little improvement. He exhibited hypoxemia (PaO₂ 56 mmHg) and was admitted. An interview revealed that he had worked in the poultry farming business for 45 years having had contact with and breeding 3,000 game fowl at the time of hospitalization. We suspected bird-related hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Results of the reaction to pigeon dropping extracts (PDE) were high, with PDE IgG 0.697 and PDE IgA 0.445. He was diagnosed with chronic bird-related hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Although the chest CT appearance was difficult to distinguish from that of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia, the test for PDE and the interview were useful for reaching a diagnosis.

INTRODUCTION: Recent technical innovation in liver surgery is remarkable. Now, for example, a preoperative 3D-simulation of the liver is a routine modality, and indispensable (or essential) for liver surgery. The aim of this presentation is to clarify various kinds of progresses and future perspective in liver surgery. PREOPERATIVE MODALITIES 1) One-stop shopping of 3D-simulation of the liver: We newly developed 3D-simulation using a software of SYNAPSE VINCENT Ver. 3.1 (Fujifilm Medical, Tokyo, Japan), in which biliary system is simultaneously reconstructed in one dynamic MD-CT. This technique avoids position error which occurred in 3D fusion image using another modality such as DIC–CT or MRCP, as well as unnecessary radiation exposure. 2) Assessment of partial functional reserve: We have reported new methods to astimate regional hepatic functional reserve using hepatocyte-phase of EOB-MRI (J Gastroenterol 2012), and fusion image of 3D-CT and asialoscintigraphy using 99m-Tc galactosyl human albumin. The method of EOB-MRI utilized character of hepatocyte-uptake of EOB through membrane transporters on hepatocytes. The other used fusion of both asialoscintigram of hepatic functional reserve and 3D-simulation by the above-mentioned software. Those techniques provided accurate estimation of partial functional volume, and help surgeons’ decision making of resection volume. INTRAOPERATIVE MODALITIES: 1) Navigation using iPad: navigation using iPad in which preoperative 3D-image data are uploaded in advance, tumor location, accurate and anatomical orientation can confirm in the operative field during operation. This technique enable not only operators also assistants or students to better understand precise anatomy. 2) Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescent image-guided navigation: this technique using HyperEye Medical System (MIZUHO IKAKOGYO Co., Ltd. Tokyo, Japan) help us to confirm tattooing of target segment and parenchymal intersegmental plane, and detect hepatic tumors (metastatic and HCC) near liver surface as well as invisible tumor inside the liver. CONCLUSIONS: Various advancements such as preoperative 3D-simulation including partial functional reserve estimation and intraoperative navigation techniques enabled surgeons to easily and safely perform hepatic resection.

We examined 12 cases of superior mesenteric artery (SMA) embolism experienced at our hospital from January 2012 to February 2022. All patients had a history of atrial fibrillation. In 5 cases, surgery was not performed due to poor general condition. Intestinal resection was performed in 4 of the 7 patients who underwent surgery. Four patients who did not undergo intestinal resection had their clot removed within the golden time of around 10 h since the onset of abdominal pain, while 3 patients who underwent intestinal resection had their clot removed after more than 10 h since onset. Patients who underwent intestinal resection had a longer hospital stay than those who did not (130.5 vs. 32.6 days). All of the patients who underwent surgery were discharged alive. On the other hand, all patients who did not undergo surgery died before discharge. There was no significant difference in age or time between onset and diagnosis in relation to the indication for surgery. SMA embolism is a less common disease occurring in about 1% of cases of acute abdominal disease, but the mortality rate is high at about 50% and the prognosis is poor. Based on our findings, it is important to distinguish SMA embolism for patients with sudden abdominal pain and to diagnose it early after onset and remove the clot to resume blood flow within the golden time when intestinal preservation can be expected. For patients in a stable general condition, treatment such as open or laparoscopic thrombectomy and intestinal resection should be considered regardless of age or time since onset of the disease.

OBJECTIVETo explore the diagnostic feasibility of noninvasive assessment of coronary atherosclerotic plaques with MSCT in comparison with IVUS.

METHODSContrast-enhanced MSCT angiography (Sensation 64, Siemens Medical Solutions) was performed before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and three-vessel IVUS (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) was performed during procedure in 12 patients with stable angina pectoris. Complete investigation was digitally stored, and assessed offline with EchoPlaque (Indec Systems, Mountain View, CA). The comparison of MSCT with IVUS was performed based on segment at plaque site (American Heart Association 15-segment model).

RESULTSA total of 88 segments in 31 vessels (left anterior descending: 12, left circumflex: 10, and right coronary artery: 9) were investigated by both IVUS and MSCT. Among 68 assessable segments (54 proximal-middle segments and 14 distal segments) by MSCT (20 segments were excluded for poor image quality: 16 for severe calcification, 2 for motion artifact, 2 for poor opacification), MSCT correctly detected 47 of the 51 segments with plaques (sensitivity: 92%), and correctly evaluated 16 of 17 segments without plaques (specificity: 94%). Concerning plaque quantification, MSCT correlated well with IVUS in grading whether the vessel obstruction was less or more than 50% (simple kappa: 0.63, 95% CI: from 0.47 to 0.78). Plaque area by MSCT also correlated with that by IVUS (r = 0.53, P < 0.01), but overestimated plaque area [(9.09 +/- 3.89) mm(2) vs. (6.80 +/- 2.81) mm(2), P < 0.01]. In addition, 30 of 43 hypoechoic compositions were detected as low-density compositions by MSCT with average CT number as 67.39 HU.

CONCLUSIONSIn segments without severe calcification, contrast-enhanced 64-slice CT angiography could detect plaques in coronary artery with high accuracy. Plaque area quantification by MSCT correlated with that of IVUS though with limited accuracy.

Background: The glissonean pedicle approach was introduced by Couinaud and Takasaki in the early 1980s. The key of the glissonean pedicle approach is clamping the pedicle first, secondly confirming the territory, and finally dissecting the liver parenchyma. In this presentation, we introduced our recent refinements of glissonean pedicle approach for liver resection. “Approach to the glissonean pedicles at the hepatic hilus” Couinaud described three approaches to the hepatic hilus. 1) Intra-fascial access (Control method): The conventional dissection at the hilus or within the sheath is referred to as intrafascial access However, dissection performed under the hilar plate is dangerous and surgeons have to consider any variations of the hepatic artery and bile ducts. 2) Extra-fascial access (Glissonean pedicle approach): The glissonean pedicle is dissected from the liver parenchyma at the hepatic hilus before dissecting the liver parenchyma. This procedure prevents intrahepatic metastasis of HCC, which spreads along the portal vein and improves the overall survival after surgery. 3) Extra-fascial and transfissural access: If the main portal fissure or the left suprahepatic fissure is opened after dissecting the liver parenchyma, the surgeon can confirm the pedicles that arise from the hilar plate or the umbilical plate. “Operative techniques” 1) Preoperative 3D simulation of the precise anatomy of portal vein, hepatic artery and bile duct at hepatic hilus should be performed. 2) Right glissonean pedicle: The hilar plate is detached from the quadrate lobe. The assistant pulls the liver parenchyma cranially and the operator conversely pulls the hepatoduodenal ligament caudally. Mayo scissors are inserted along the liver parenchyma between the liver parenchyma and glissonean capsule (Fig.1). Then forceps are inserted in the same way and the right main pedicle is taped (Fig.2). The right anterior and posterior glissonean pedicles are taped as well. 3) Left glissonean pedicle: The hilar plate is detached from the liver parenchyma. Then, the Arantius duct is confirmed and the left pedicle is dissected along the left pedicle at the ventral side of the Arantius duct. “Pitfall of glissonean pedicle approach” The right pedicle should be dissected in the liver side as much as possible to prevent the injury of left hepatic duct. If possible, the right pedicle is recommended to be dissected at the level of the second branches separately (Fig.3). The right posterior hepatic duct sometimes branches from the left hepatic duct and the Arantius duct is confirmed and the left pedicle should be dissected along the left pedicle at the ventral side of the Arantius duct because the right posterior hepatic duct branches from the left hepatic duct at the dorsal side of Arantius’ duct. In addition, the intraoperative cholangiogram should be used in the case with the abnormal anatomy of bile duct. Conclusions: Any anatomical hepatectomy can be performed using “glissonean pedicle approach” which allows simple, safe and easy liver resection.

Simultaneous creation of an enterostomy for enteral nutrition during esophagectomy has been useful in our experience, but bowel obstruction associated with intestinal fistula remains a problem. Therefore, in this study, we retrospectively reviewed 18 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent transdiaphragmatic transgastric tube enteral feeding catheter placement during gastric tube reconstruction via the mediastinal route after esophagectomy from November 2012 to March 2014. The catheter was guided from the gastric tube into the gastrointestinal tract, with the tip placed in the jejunum distal to the ligament of Treitz. From the gastric tube, the catheter was guided along the diaphragm to the anterior abdominal wall through the extraperitoneal route. No bowel obstruction associated with catheter placement has been observed in any of the patients from the time of surgery to this writing. Also, the procedure enabled jejunostomy use for more than 5 years, similar to conventional jejunostomy. We experienced 1 case of catheter deviation into the mediastinum. Overall, transgastric tube enteral feeding catheter placement for reconstruction of the posterior mediastinal gastric tube was useful for avoiding intestinal obstruction associated with jejunostomy. However, there may be a risk of catheter displacement into the mediastinum.