Objective:To compare the efficacy and adverse reactions of picosecond and nanosecond Nd∶YAG laser 532 nm in the treatment of seborrheic keratosis.Methods:A total of 30 patients with seborrheic keratosis were enrolled in this study. The rash size was more than 1-2 cm. Half of them were treated with picosecond laser and the other half with nanosecond Q-switched Nd∶YAG laser by wavelength of 532 nm. The treatment effect and adverse reactions were evaluated by observing the area and the disappearance of pigment. The patients were followed up for 3 months after treatment.Results:The total effective rate was 73.33% in the experimental group and 53.33% in the control group, with no significant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05), but the pain score, satisfactory score, scab shedding time and the incidence of pigmentation in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05). Conclusions:The 532 nm picosecond laser has a higher efficiency in treating seborrheic keratosis than 532 nm Q-switched Nd∶YAG, but it has no statistical significance. However, the self satisfaction is higher than that of the control group; the pain score, scab shedding time and the incidence of pigmentation are lower than those of the control group, with statistical significance. Therefore, picosecond 532 nm laser treatment of early seborrheic keratosis is worthy of clinical promotion.

Objective To systematically evaluate the measurement properties and methodological quality of the palliative quality assessment tools based on the cancer patient experiences,and to provide an evidence-based basis for the selection of a high-quality assessment tool for healthcare professionals.Methods Systematic search of PubMed,Embase,Web of Science,CINAHL,CNKI,Wanfang database,VIP database,and China Biomedical Literature database for studies related to the evaluation of the measurement properties of the self-report palliative care quality assessment tools for cancer patients.The search period from the date of creation to December 10,2023.There are 2 researchers who independently conducted literature screening and data extraction according to the COSMIN selection criteria,and used the COSMIN Risk of Bias Inventory and Quality Criteria Scale to measure the academic characteristics and form the final recommendations.Results A total of 19 studies involving 8 assessment tools for cancer patients were included.The final 6 assessment tools were recommended at level B.2 assessment tools are recommended at level A.Conclusion The SF-QCQ-PC and the Self-Report Palliative Care Quality Assessment Tool for Terminal Cancer Patients can be provisionally recommended.However,further validation of its measurement properties is still needed.