Objective To prove that valve sparing aortic root reconstruction may have an impact on the outcome and longevity of the repair for patients with acute type A aortic dissection.Methods Clinical data of 98 consecutive AAAD patients undergoing the valve sparing aortic root reconstruction were analyzed.The postoperative follow-up and the clinical effect of the procedure were retrospectively analyzed.Results Pre-operative grade of aortic insufficiency was(2.3 ± 0.5), CPB-time was (217.8 ± 43.1)min, aortic cross clamp time was(142.7 ± 37.4)min and stay on ICU (11.1 ± 5.7) days, while hospitalisation was(14.3 ± 3.2) days.8 patients(8.2％) died peri-operatively.None of the early deaths were valve-related.Rethoracotomy rate was 3.1％.All patients followed up(19.3 ± 7.6) (6-68) months.Survival at 1 year was 90.8％.Freedom from valvular reoperation was 97.9％ at 3 years.At last investigation, mean grade of aortic insufficiency for AADA was 0.5 ± 0.3 (0-3).Conclusion Regardless of the underlying indication, the aortic valve preserving reimplantation technique can be performed with favourable functional results.

Objective To analyze the effect of the false lumenstatus of different methods in a single center.Methods From January 2010 to December 2015,391 cases of acute Stanford A aortic dissection were treated in our center.139 cases(of which 108 malesand 31 females) were finally selected after excluding the cases who died during hospitalization,whose perioperative clinical data were incomplete,follow-up information were incomplete,and DeBakey type Ⅱ aortic dissection and the cases with descending aorta dilatation.The average age was(50.3 ± 11.6) years(22-76 years).According to the methods for aortic arch and descending aorta,139 cases were divided into 5 groups:24 cases in AR(including ascending aorta replacement,ascending aorta + hemi-arch replacement and ascending aorta + island-arch replacement),9 cases in AR + SET (including ascending aorta + hemi-arch replacement + stent elephant trunk and ascending aorta + island-arch replacement + stent elephant trunk),42 cases in Arch + SET(ascending aorta + arch replacement + stent elephant trunk),22 cases in AR + TBS (ascending aorta + triple branched stent) and 42 cases in AR + FS(ascending aorta + arch fenestrated stent).Statistical analysis the size of true lemen and the status of false lumen among these five groups in the level of aortic arch,the distal end of stent,diaphragm,celiac artery,renal artery and iliacartery postoperatively.Results Different levels of descending aorta in each group have showed arying degrees of true lumen open and thrombosisof false lumen during follow-up period.Among them,cases with aortic arch treatment and stent implantation have showed higher ratio of thrombosis of false lumen.Effects of different stents were similar,which all promoted the process of thrombosis of false lumen.Conclusion Three methods for aortrc arch and desc ending aorta repair including Cronus (R),triple branched stent and arch fenstrafed stent had similar clinical aortic false lumen closure rate.Three methods had similar long term effect.

Objective Acute Stanford type A aortic dissection(aTAAD) is often misdiagnosed as acute coronary syndrome(ACS), anti-platelet therapy for ACS will influence the timing and outcome of aTAAD.We reviewed the surgical outcome of these misdiagnosed aTAAD patients.Methods From January 2011 to October 2015, 309 aTAAD patients have received surgical therapy in our department, among them 15 patients had misdiagnosed as ACS and taken oral anti-platelet therapy, 9 male and 6 female, the average age was(60.6±8.7) years.Retrospectively reviewed the data of perioperative and follow-up period.Results 5 patients took orally aspirin, 10 took aspirin and clopidogrel.2 patients had received operation 7 days after stopping the agents, 3 days for 3 patients, 1 day for 1 patient, and the other 5 patients received emergency operation without stopping the agents.The cardiopulmonary bypass time was(259.7±64.8) minutes, aortic cross-clamp time was(181.0±51.7) minutes, and selective cerebral perfusion and lower body arrest time was(34.9±8.1) minutes.There were 2 in-hospital deaths due to circulation failure(mortality 13.3%).The average drainage volume in the first 24 hours after operation was(800.7±598.8)ml.During a mean follow-up period of(20.6±17.4) months, one patient had suddenly death.Conclusion aTAAD misdiagnosed as ACS was not rare, anti-platelet therapy will increase the risk of bleeding.The decision of operation time rely on considering balance between the rupture risk of aortic dissection and the hemorrhage risk of anti-platelet therapy.Emergency operation for these patients will increase the bleeding and transfusion.

Objective:To introduce a new method of root reconstruction for proximal repair of acute type A aortic dissection, and to retrospectively analyze its short-term efficacy.Methods:From January 2018 to October 2019, a total of 455 patients with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection received surgical treatment. Among them, 343 patients underwent double-jacket-wrapping(DJW) root reinforcement(11 patients underwent leaflet suspension), 81 patients underwent Bentall surgery, 15 Wheat operations, 12 untreated roots, and 4 David operations. Compared 343 patients who underwent double-jacket-wrapping root reconstruction and 81 patients who underwent Bentall surgery. The perioperative indicators and short-term survival of the two groups were compared.Results:No patients died intraoperatively. The 30-day mortality rate in the DJW group and the Bentall group were 10.5% and 7.4%, respectively( P=0.403); cardiopulmonary bypass time were(218.8±68.4) min and(240.2 ± 59.8), P=0.011; aortic clamp time were(150.6 ± 47.9) min and(181.3 ±45.6)min, P=0.000. There was no difference between the operation time and the deep hypothermia circulatory time between the two groups. The mean follow-up was(11.7±6.4) months. Seven and two follow-up deaths occurred in the DJW group and the Bentall group, respectively, and the cause of death was not related to the aortic root. The degree of aortic regurgitation after DJW was 0.7±0.5, which was significantly lower than that before surgery( P=0.000). Conclusion:Compared with Bentall surgery, DJW method is a safe and effective method for the repair of acute type A aortic dissection roots, which can obtain good perioperative and early curative effects.

Objective:To summarize acute type A aortic dissection(ATAAD) is relatively uncommon in dialysis patients, and repair outcomes are not fully understood.Methods:Between January 2014 and March 2020, 20 patients with ATAAD required dialysis for preoperative end-stage renal disease(ESRD) were treated by our group. There were 11 male and 9 female patients at mean age of(47.8±11.3) years. The mean duration of dialysis therapy in the total 20 patients before the onset of ATAAD was(4.5±3.9 )years, with 90%(18 cases) of these patients undergoing hemodialysis(rather than peritoneal dialysis). 17 patients were treated emergency surgically, surgical operation were performed under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest and perfused the cerebral selective cerebral perfusion, 5 cases with ascending aorta + arch fenestrated stent, 5 cases with ascending aorta+ hemi-arch replacement(2 cases with stent elephant trunk), 4 cases with ascending aorta+ arch replacement+ stent elephant trunk(1 case with coronary artery bypass grafting for left anterior descending coronary artery), 2 cases with aortic valvuloplasty + ascending aorta+ hemi-arch replacement, 1 case with Bentall+ arch fenestrated stent.Results:2 patients were died from aortic ruptured before operation, 1 patient treated medically was alive three months after admission. Cross-clamp, cardiopulmonary bypass, and circulatory arrest times of all the surgical patients were(233.8±84.4) min, (155.5±63.6)min and(28.2±10.8)min, respectively. The following complications occurred postoperative: 3 cases died in the hospital, 1 case of tracheotomy, 2 cases of cerebral infarction, 1 case of cerebral hemorrhage, 1 case of transient paraplegia, and 1 case of surgical site infection. After a mean follow-up of(11.6±14.5) months(rang, 3-61 months). the overall survival rate at 1 year and 5 years was 53% and 27% respectively.Conclusion:Dialysis patients with ATAAD should be operated on urgently and medical treatment carries high risks of aortic rupture, although in-hospital mortality is acceptable, long-term mortality is poor.

Objective To evaluate the safety and feasibility of extra-anatomic bypass in the treatment of complex aorta coarctation concomitant with cardiac lesions,multiple stenosis of aorta or severe stenosis.Methods Complex aorta coarctation include a combination of heart disease (valve disease,coronary artery disease,ect.),or multiple constrictive lesions of the thoracic abdominal aorta or an aneurysm due to constriction of the arch,which are all difficult by interventional surgery or open thoracotomy surgery.From October 2016 to October 2017,6 patients with complex aorta coarctation have received surgical therapy in our department,including 3 males and 3 females,with the average age(50.0-± 17.9) years old.One-staged extra-anatomic bypass was used to establish an ascending aorta to the distal aorta bypass,4 patients underwent median thoracotomy and bypass surgery with thoracic aorta from the posterior inferior pericardium,1 patient underwent bypass surgery with abdominal aorta through thoracoabdominal incision,and 1 patient underwent bypass surgery with bilateral femoral artery from bilateral inguinal incision and guiding with laparoscopic through peritoneal cavity.Among them,3 patients underwent valve surgery in the same period,and 1 patient underwent coronary artery bypass surgery.Results No patient died.The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 273.8 minutes and the average aorta blocking time was 216.0 minutes.Pulse pressure of extremities blood pressure was significantly reduced compared with preoperative,and the clinical symptoms were significantly alleviation.During follow-up,6 patients presented with patent artificial blood vessels and alleviated symptoms.Conclusion Extra-anatomic bypass is a safe and effective method for the treatment of complex vasoconstriction without increasing the risk of surgery.

Objective To summarize the surgical treatment strategy of acute Stanford A aortic dissection with coronary malperfusion.Methods From January 2010 to November 2015,307 patients of acute Stanford A aortic dissection underwent operation were included.The mean age was (51.3 ± 13.0) years,ranged from 22 to 83.The BMI was (25.4 ± 3.7) kg/m2 and 239 (77.9％) were men.There were 210 (71.2％) with hypertension,9 (2.9％) with Marian syndrome,and 44 (14.3％) with cardiac tamponade.Coronary malperfusion was confirmed in 43(14.0％) patients with 34 in right coronary artery,5 in left coronary artery,and 4 in both.There were 26 type A,8 type B,9 type C in Neri system.We performed coronary ostia repair in 12 patients,Bentall in 16,coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG) in 9,and Bentall plus CABG in 6.CABG was also performed in 1 Bentall,1 aortic valve repair,and 5 ascending aorta replacement in 264 patients without coronary malperfusion.Results The rate of CABG,cardiopulmonary bypass(CPB) time,aorta cross-clamp time were significantly higher in patients with coronary malperfusion(P ＜0.01).The in-hospital mortality was 32.6％ in patients with coronary malperfusion and 14.4％ in patients without coronary malperfusion.Thus,coronary malperfusion significantly increased in-hospital mortality(P ＜0.01).The mean follow-up time was(19.2 ± 18.0) months with a 95％ follow-up rate.The total follow-up survival rate is 97.5％ and the rate of patients with coronary malperfusion is 100％.Multivariate logistic regression analysis shows that cardiac tamponade(OR =4.8,P ＜0.01) and CPB time(OR =1.0,P ＜0.01) was the independent risk factor of post-operation inhospital mortality of acute Stanford A aortic dissection.Conclusion Acute Stanford A aortic dissection with coronary malperfusion has a significantly high in-hospital mortality with the indeed need of revascularization of coronary arteries rapidly.The treatment strategy depends on the specific clinical condition.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair has served as the predominant treatment approach for patients with thoracic aortic diseases. In order to ensure the successful release of the stent as well as a good proximal anchoring effect, it is necessary to preserve or reconstruct the left subclavian supply as much as possible. With the advance of various endovascular assistive technologies, different left subclavian artery revascularization techniques have gained widespread acceptance. So far, techniques include carotid-subclavian bypass or transposition, chimney grafts, fenestrations, branched aortic devices can reconstruct the left subclavian artery and other branch vessels on the arch. This article reviewed the present situation of left subclavian artery reconstruction and the selection of surgical methods of thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

Objective:To investigate the short-term effects of staged hybrid abdominal aortic debranching technique in the treatment of thoracoabdominal aorta.Methods:From January 2018 to December 2018, 22 patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms underwent surgical treatment in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital. Among them, 12 underwent staged hybrid abdominal aortic debranching (AAD), and 10 underwent traditional thoracoabdominal aortic replacement (TAR). AAD consisted of two phases: the first phase of surgery was mid-opening, Y-type artificial blood vessels replaced the lower abdominal aorta and bilateral common iliac arteries, and the abdominal aortic branches were reconstructed at the same time: right branch artificial blood vessels-right renal artery-left renal artery, the left branch artificial blood vessel-superior mesenteric artery-common hepatic artery; the second phase was endovascular repair anchoring normal and long-term normal aorta or artificial blood vessel. The clinical effected of two methods for the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms were compared and analyzed.Results:The overall mortality rate was 13.6%, and the mortality rate in the TAR group increased significantly (0 vs. 30%). The main cause was dissection (91.7% vs. 90.0%, P=0.895). Crawford classification was predominantly type Ⅱ in both groups(58.3% vs. 50.0%, P=0.082). The proportion of patients with Marfan syndrome in the TAR group was higher (30% vs. 0, P=0.046). The TAR group was significantly more drained 24 h after surgery [(355.0±199.2)ml vs. (1244.0±716.1)ml, P= 0.003]. The TAR group had a higher proportion of lung infections (40% vs. 0, P= 0.018). The average cost was higher in the AAD group [(28.4±8.3) ten thousands yuan vs. (19.3±10.4) ten thousands yuan, P= 0.033]. Conclusion:The staged hybrid abdominal aortic debranching technique can effectively treat thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Compared with traditional thoracoabdominal aortic replacement, the surgical trauma is smaller but more expensive.

Objective: To discuss the perioperative and follow-up results of different surgical methods for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection patients and analyzed the results. Methods: The clinic data of 351 acute Stanford type A aortic dissection patients received surgical therapy at Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Nanjing University Medical School Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from January 2008 to December 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. There were 272 male and 79 female patients, aging from 22 to 83 years with a mean age of (52±13) years. According to root size, aortic valve structure and the status of dissection involvement, these patients were devided into three major groups: 218 cases with root reconstruction using Dacron felts, 34 cases with root reconstruction concomitant with aortic valve resuspension repair and 99 cases in with Bentall procedure. Proper shape based on the status of dissection involvement of Dacron patch was cut and put between the middle and outerlayer of aorta, then inside the inner layerone band Dacron felt was sutured with the aorta and the new middle layer with Dacron patch as mentioned above. In some cases the prolapsed aortic valve was re-suspended to the aortic cusp. Clinical outcomes among the 3 procedures were compared by χ² test, Fisher′s exact test, t test and analysis of variance. Results: Cardiopulmonary bypass, cross-clamp, and circulatory arrest times of all the patients were (250±78), (171±70) and (31±10) minutes, respectively. The 30-day mortality was 9.2%(33/351), while no difference among the 3 procedures (9.6%, 8.8% and 9.1%). In the average follow-up time of (26.0±23.0) months (range from 0.5 to 90.0 months), survival rates were similar among the 3 procedures (77.7%, 77.4% and 77.8%). Only one patient received redo Bentall procedure because of severe aortic regurgitation and dilated aortic root (diameter of 50 mm). Conclusions The indication of root management of acute Stanford type A aortic dissection is based on the diameter of aortic root, structure of aortic leaflets, and the dissection involvement. For most acute Stanford type A aortic dissection patients, aortic root reconstruction is a feasible and safe method.