Intravascular administration of iodinated contrast media can cause contrast-induced acute kidney injury, especially in patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . The American College of Radiology (ACR) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines recommend renal function screening based on medical history, but their effectiveness has been under-evaluated. This retrospective study included 2,560 consecutive adult outpatients without eGFR measurements within 180 days before contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) at a single tertiary hospital from July through September 2023. On the day of CT, they underwent eGFR tests and 1.1% had an eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , preferentially with histories of gout and renal disease. According to the ACR and ESUR strategies, 16.9% and 38.8% of all study participants were positive, respectively, identifying 92.6% and 96.3% of patients with renal insufficiency. Both strategies demonstrated high negative predictive values. These results support selective renal function screening before contrast-enhanced examinations.

Intravascular administration of iodinated contrast media can cause contrast-induced acute kidney injury, especially in patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . The American College of Radiology (ACR) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines recommend renal function screening based on medical history, but their effectiveness has been under-evaluated. This retrospective study included 2,560 consecutive adult outpatients without eGFR measurements within 180 days before contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) at a single tertiary hospital from July through September 2023. On the day of CT, they underwent eGFR tests and 1.1% had an eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , preferentially with histories of gout and renal disease. According to the ACR and ESUR strategies, 16.9% and 38.8% of all study participants were positive, respectively, identifying 92.6% and 96.3% of patients with renal insufficiency. Both strategies demonstrated high negative predictive values. These results support selective renal function screening before contrast-enhanced examinations.

Intravascular administration of iodinated contrast media can cause contrast-induced acute kidney injury, especially in patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . The American College of Radiology (ACR) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines recommend renal function screening based on medical history, but their effectiveness has been under-evaluated. This retrospective study included 2,560 consecutive adult outpatients without eGFR measurements within 180 days before contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) at a single tertiary hospital from July through September 2023. On the day of CT, they underwent eGFR tests and 1.1% had an eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , preferentially with histories of gout and renal disease. According to the ACR and ESUR strategies, 16.9% and 38.8% of all study participants were positive, respectively, identifying 92.6% and 96.3% of patients with renal insufficiency. Both strategies demonstrated high negative predictive values. These results support selective renal function screening before contrast-enhanced examinations.

Intravascular administration of iodinated contrast media can cause contrast-induced acute kidney injury, especially in patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . The American College of Radiology (ACR) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines recommend renal function screening based on medical history, but their effectiveness has been under-evaluated. This retrospective study included 2,560 consecutive adult outpatients without eGFR measurements within 180 days before contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) at a single tertiary hospital from July through September 2023. On the day of CT, they underwent eGFR tests and 1.1% had an eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , preferentially with histories of gout and renal disease. According to the ACR and ESUR strategies, 16.9% and 38.8% of all study participants were positive, respectively, identifying 92.6% and 96.3% of patients with renal insufficiency. Both strategies demonstrated high negative predictive values. These results support selective renal function screening before contrast-enhanced examinations.

To date, documentation of two doses of measles-containing vaccine (MCV) has been accepted as confirmation of measles immunity among healthcare workers (HCWs). However, we encountered measles in an HCW who had received two doses of MCV. A patient with measles was admitted to our hospital. Among 62 exposed HCWs, one nurse who had previously received two doses of MCV was shown to be negative for anti-measles immunoglobulin G (IgG), and was confirmed to have measles 14 days after exposure. Based on this experience, we suggest that all HCWs should be tested for anti-measles IgG to confirm their immunity to measles.