Objective To study the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic total splenectomy (LTS) and laparoscopic partial splenectomy (LPS) in the diagnosis and treatment of benign splenic tumors by comparing the perioperative and follow-up data between these two operative approaches.Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 57 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for benign splenic tumors from December 2009 to April 2016.These patients were divided into the LTS and the LPS groups.The clinical data including the preoperative,intraoperative,postoperative and follow-up data were analyzed.Results When compared with the LPS group,the LTS group had shorter operation time [(97.0 ± 22.1)min vs.(135.0 ± 24.6) min,P ＜ 0.05] and less blood loss [(33.3 ± 19.5) min vs.(90.6 ± 55.1)min,P ＜ 0.05],but there were no significant differences between the two groups in the length of hospital stay,the duration of drainage tube placement,the amount of postoperative analgesics as well as the incidences of pulmonary infection,postoperative pancreatic fistula and other complications after surgery.These incidences were low in the two groups.Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery,including LTS and LPS,were safe and feasible in treating benign splenic tumors.

Objective To investigate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy.MethodsThe data of 59 patients with laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in Shangjin hospital of West China hospital of Sichuan University from January 2014 to December 2015 were analyzed retrospectively.The general data,operative time,estimated blood loss,conversion rate,time to liquid diet,postoperative hospital stay and complications were analyzed.Results The laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy were successfully performed in 56 cases,the successful rate was 94.9%,the other 3 patients were converted to laparotomy for superior mesenteric vein/portal vein involvement.The operative time was 255~510 minutes,with mean operative time (384±145) minutes,the intraoperatve blood soss was 50~800 mL,with mean estimated blood loss (148±28)mL,the time to liquid diet was 1.0~4.0 days,with average time (3.2±1.1)days,the postoperative hospital stay was 5.0~53.0 days,with average time (10.3±2.6)days.After surgery,16 cases suffered from complication,the rate was 27.1%.The most common complication was pancreatic fistula which occurred in 13 cases including 12 cases of grade A and 1 case of grade pancreatic fistula.No grade C pancreatic fistula occurred in this series.Six patients suffered from delayed gastric emptying.One patient suffered from bile leakage.Conclusion Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy was safe and feasible.Pylorus-preserving does not increase the incidence of delayed gastric emptying.

Objective To investigate the application value of enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS) in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD).Methods The retrospective cohort study was adopted.The clinical data of 64 patients who underwent LPD from January 2014 to January 2016 in the Shangjin Hospital of West China Hospital of Sichuan University were collected.Of the 64 patients,41 patients managed with ERAS program between March 2015 and January 2016 were allocated into the ERAS group,23 patients managed with traditional perioperative treatment between January 2014 and Febuary 2015 were allocated into the traditional group.The following indexes were observed:(l) intraoperative status:operation time,volume of intraoperative blood loss,conversion to open surgery,pylorus preservation.(2) Postoperative status:the time to out-of-bed activity,time to postoperative flatus,time of drainage tube removal,postoperative complications (pancreatic leakage,bile leakage,hemorrhage,delayed gastric emptying,abdominal infection,cardiovascular complications),duration of postoperative hospital stay,death within the postoperative 30 days.(3) Follow-up status:incidence of complications after discharge and survival of patients.The follow-up including incidence of complications after discharge and survival of patients was conducted by outpatient examination and telephone interview up to March 2016.Measurement data with normal distribution were presented as (x) ± s and analyzed by t test.Count data were analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability.Results (1) Intraoperative status:the operation time,volume of intraoperative blood loss,number of patients with conversion to open surgery and pylorus preservation were (377 ± 38) minutes,(164 ± 48) mL,1,40 in the ERAS group and (392 ± 53) minutes,(152 ±31)mL,2,21 in the traditional group,showing no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (t =5.02,8.43,x2=1.29,1.29,P ＞ 0.05).(2) Postoperative status:the time to out-of-bed activity,time to postoperative flatus,time of drainage tube removal and duration of postoperative hospital stay were (1.7 ± 0.6)days,(2.5 ± 0.6) days,(5.3 ± 1.7) days,(9.1 ± 1.3) days in the ERAS group and (2.1 ± 0.9) days,(3.8 ±1.2) days,(8.2 ± 2.6) days,(11.9 ± 1.8) days in the traditional group,showing statistically significant differences between the 2 groups(t =-5.28,-7.01,-16.20,-10.67,P ＜ 0.05).The numbers of patients with pancreatic leakage in stage A,B and C,bile leakage,hemorrhage,delayed gastric emptying,abdominal inflection,cardiovascular complications and death in the postoperative 30 days were 8,0,0,0,1,3,0,1,1 in the ERAS group and 5,1,0,1,1,3,2,1,0 in the traditional group,respectively,showing no significant difference between the 2 groups (x2=0.37,1.81,0.18,0.57,3.68,0.18,P ＞0.05).(3) Follow-up status:the 64 patients were followed up for a median time of 11 months (range,1-25 months).During the follow-up,number of patients complicated with diabetes,local tumor recurrence,liver metastasis and death were 5,4,1,0in the ERAS group and 2,5,2,3 (2 died of tumor recurrence and 1 died of myocardial infarction) in the traditonal group.Conclusion Application of ERAS in the perioperative management of LPD is safe and effective,meanwhile,it can accelerate the recovery of patients who underwent LPD and shorten the duration of hospital stay.

Objective To assess the surgical skills and clinical outcomes of selective splenic pedicle occlusion (SSPO) in laparoscoic partial splenectomy.Methods Between May 2011 and Nov 2016,40 patients undergoing laparoscopic partial splenectomy were devided into selective splenic pedicle occlusion group (14 cases) and conventional laparoscopic partial splenectomy group (26 cases).Results There were no significant differences in preoperative patient characteristics between the two groups.Significantly less intraoperative blood loss (82 ± 36) ml vs (178 ± 81) ml (t =-4.2,P =0.001) were observed in group of SSPD,There were no significant differences between the groups in operative time (111 ± 17) min vs (127 ±40) min(t =-1.4,P =0.19),transfusion rate (0/14,0/26) (P =1),conversion rate (0/14,0/26) (P =1),postoperative complications (1/14,2/26) (Fisher =0.063,P =0.80) and length of postoperative hospital stay (7.1 ± 2.3) d vs (6.0 ± 1.3) d (t =1.28,P =0.22).Conclusions SSPO is feasible and safe for patients receiving laparoscopic partial splenectomy.

Objective To evaluate surgical therapies for chronic pancreatitis.Method The clinical data of 229 patients admitted for chronic pancreatitis during March 2009 to November 2013 in our hospital was retrospectively analyzed,different operation method and their clinical outcome were compared.Results Drainage operations or resection operations were made to all these 229 patients according to different types.57 patients underwent longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy (LPJ procedure).118 patients received local resection of the head of pancreas combined with longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy (Frey procedure in 105 cases,Berne procedure in 6 cases,Beger procedure in 7 cases).7 patients received pancreaticoduodenectomy,21 patients received distal pancreas resection,26 patients received other procedures.Post-operative pain relief rate was 89.3％,overall morbidity was 19.6％.Conclusions In cases of chronic pancreatitis,different surgical types are adopted according to their individual indications.Operation in accordance with pathological types guarantees clinical outcome.

Objective To compare biliary tract intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (BT-IPMN) with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas (P-IPMN).Methods From January 2008 to December 2013,eleven (6.0％) cases of BT-IPMNs were retrospectively identified from a total of 182 biliary tract tumors resected in our institution,while 50 cases underwent surgery for P-IPMN.The mean age of the 11 BT-IPMN cases was 57.3 years (range 40 to 74 years).There were 8 men (73.0％).The mean age of the 50 P-IPMN cases was 57.4 years (range 33 to 85 years).There were 34 men (68.0％).The clinical features,radiologic findings,pathology,surgical strategies,and long-term follow up outcomes between the 2 groups of patients were analyzed.Results There was no significant difference between BT-IPMN and P-IPMN in the following aspects:mean age,sex ratios and clinical presentation [including the most common presenting symptom abdominal pain (73.0％ vs.68.0％),and elevated tumor markers (CEA and CA19-9)].The mean tumor size of BT-IPMN was significantly smaller than P-IPMN (1.7 vs.4.1 cm,P ＜ 0.05).Macroscopically visible mucin was detected in all the 11 patients basing on the original surgical reports.The most common abnormal preoperative imaging findings for BT-IPMN were bile duct dilatation (100％) and intraluminal masses (55.0％).Most cases (82.0％) involved the intrahepatic bile duct and hilum.For tumor clearance,we conducted left hepatectomy in most cases (64.0％).Only one patient underwent biopsy and choledochojejunostomy for multiple tumors involving the extrahepatic,right and left bile ducts.BT-IPMN was likely to have a higher risk of malignancy (55.0％ vs.44.0％) and poorer prognosis (median survival,57 vs.63 months),although there was no significant difference (P ＞ 0.05).The patient without tumor resection died of liver failure 22 months after palliative surgery.Conclusions BT-IPMNs are very rare and they had some similarity with P-IPMN.Complete resection of BT-IPMN is associated with good survival.

Objective To investigate the safety of the laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) in 70 years of age or older patients.Methods The retrospective cohort study was conducted.The clinicopathological data of 40 patients (age ≥70 years old) who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University between January 2012 and December 2016 were collected.Twenty patients undergoing LPD were allocated into the LPD group,and 20 receiving open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) who were selected by random number table during the same period were allocated into the OPD group.Observation indicators included:(1) intraoperative situations;(2) postoperative situations;(3) follow-up situation.Follow-up using outpatient examination and telephone interview was performed to detect the patients' survival after discharge and tumor recurrence and metastasis up to March 2017.Measurement data with normal distribution was represented as x±s,and comparison between groups were evaluated with the t test.Measurement data with skewed distribution were described as median (range) and comparison between groups was analyzed using the nonparametric test.Comparison of count data was analyzed using the chi-square test.Comparison of ranked data was analyzed by non parametric test.Results (1) Intraoperative situations:1 patient in the LPD group was converted to open surgery,with a conversive rate of 5.0％ (1/20).Operative time and volume of intraoperative blood loss were (463 ± 10) minutes,210.5 mL (152.5-300.0 mL) in the LPD group and (332± 25) minutes,420.0 mL (350.1-493.8 mL) in the OPD group,showing statistically significant differences between the 2 groups (t =5.48,Z =-3.98,P＜0.05).Cases with intraoperative blood transfusion and pylorus preservation were respectively 4,14 in the LPD group and 6,10 in the OPD group,showing no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (x2=0.53,1.67,P＞0.05).The results of intraoperative rapid frozen pathological examination showed negative margin of the 40 patients.(2) Postoperative situations:cases in ICU,cases with postoperative analgesia,time for out-of-bed activity,time to anal exsufflation and time for intake were 17,7,(2.2±0.7)days,(4.2± 0.9)days,(4.8±0.7)days in the LPD group and 6,15,(3.6±0.8)days,(5.7±0.9)days,(7.1 ± 2.7)days in the OPD group,showing statistically significant differences between the 2 groups (x2 =12.34,6.47,t=-6.18,-6.55,-3.65,P＜0.05).Pancreatic fistula,delayed gastric emptying (Grade B),postoperative bleeding (Grade B),biliary fistula,pulmonary infection,intestinal obstruction,wound infection,reoperation and major complication were respectively detected in 2,3,1,1,3,1,0,2,3 patients of the LPD group and 2,4,1,1,4,1,2,3,4 in patients of the OPD group,showing no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (x2 =0.00,0.17,0.00,0.00,0.17,0.00,2.11,0.23,0.17,P＞0.05).Results of postoperative pathological examination showed that duodenal adenocarcinoma,ampullary carcinoma,lower bile duct carcinoma,pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and pancreatic cystic tumor were respectively detected in 8,2,5,3,2 patients of the LPD group and 10,2,4,2,2 patients of the OPD group,showing no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (x2 =0.53,P＞0.05).Duration of postoperative hospital stay in the LPD and OPD groups were (19± 13) days and (15±7) days,respectively,showing no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (t =1.28,P＞ 0.05).Results of postoperative oncology showed that tumor diameter,number of lymph node dissected,number of positive lymph nodes,cases with negative margin,cases in T1N0M0,T2N0M0,T3N0M0,T3N1M0,T4N0M0,T4N1M0 of TNM staging were respectively (2.4±0.7)cm,15.4±2.3,2,20,2,7,8,2,1,0 in the LPD group and (2.8±0.9)cm,14.4±2.5,3,20,1,8,5,2,3,1 in the OPD group,with no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (t =-1.64,1.32,x2 =0.23,0.00,Z =-0.69,P＞ 0.05).(3) Follow-up situation:1 patient died respectively in both groups within the postoperative 30 days.Thirty-eight patients were followed up for 1-26 months,with a median time of 14 months.During follow-up,2 patients had tumor recurrence and 1 died of myocardial infarction in the LPD group;3 had tumor recurrence and 1 died of tumor recurrence in the OPD group.Conclusion LPD in 70 years of age or older patients is not only safe and feasible,but also significantly reduce volume of intraoperative blood loss and demand of analgesia,as well as quickly resume normal diet and activities.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a standard surgical method for periampullary cancer.The hemorrhage is a dangerous complication after PD,how to effectively prevent and treat hemorrhage is a difficult point of pancreatic surgery,and also a key for reducing postoperative mortality.Four famous experts and their teams in surgical fiell explored prevention and treatment of the hemorrhage after PD from different angles based on clinical experiences.Professor Shen Boyong has conducted a discussion on early and Date hemorrhage after PD combined with previous successful experiences and prospective research data.Professor Chen Yajin suggested preventing hemorrhage in the aspects of anatomical resection,anastomosis and reconstruction,peritoneal drainage-tube placement and postoperative management based on different causes of hemorrhage.Professor Peng Bing paid attention to hemorrhage after laparoscopic PD,and supposed that intraoperative careful hemostasis,precise anastomosis,reasonable peritoneal drainage-tube placement and optimal perioperative management can reduce incidences of postoperative pancreatic fistula,biliary fistula and intra-abdominal infection,thereby lowering the incidence of hemorrhage.Professor Tan Guang respectively proposed processing strategies of hemorrhagc for grading A (mild at early stage),B (severe at early stage and mild at late stage) and C (severe at late stage).