Objective: To explore the effectiveness of KeyPort access in transanal endoscopic mircrosurgery (TEM). Methods: A descriptive case series study was performed. Clinicopathological data of 20 patients undergoing KeyPort access TEM in Beijing Chaoyang Hospital of Capital Medical University from December 2016 to April 2018 were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Procedure of KeyPort access TEM: general anesthesia or combined spinal epidural anesthesia (CSEA); lithotomy or prone jack-knife position; anal dilation; placement of the KeyPortaccess; connection of TEM pneumoperitoneum device, light source and imaging equipment; placement of 5 mm dedicated endoscope; insufflation of CO2 with pressure of 1.6-2.0 kPa (12-15 mmHg); after rinsing the intestinal lumen, circular resection marginlabeled by the needle-shaped electrocautery;electric coagulation or ultrasonic knife used to perform a full-thickness resection with a 0.5 cm-1 cm margin along the marking line. Indications of KeyPort access TEM: (1) benign large sessile polyps which were difficult to resect under colonoscopy; (2) submucosal lesions with diameter <2 cm; (3) Tis and T1 stage rectal carcinoma without lymph node metastasis; (4) palliative resection of T2 stage rectal carcinoma without lymph node metastasis. Contraindications: (1) accompanying serious diseases without the tolerance of anesthesia and operation; (2) distance from lesion to anal verge >20 cm. Results: There were 10 males and 10 females with age of (63±15) years old and BMI of (24.5±3.3) kg/m². The diameter of the lesions was (2.0±1.3) cm, and the distance from lesion to anal verge was (6.2±2.2) cm. One patient had 3 lesions at different positions in rectum with diameters of 0.5 cm, 0.5 cm, and 1 cm, respectively. All operations were accomplished through the KeyPort access TEM and no case was transferred to other methods. The duration of surgery was 75 (30-220) minutes; intraoperative blood loss was 10 (0-30) ml. Two patients with rectal anterior wall lesions underwent full-thickness resection of the intestine wall reaching the peritoneal reflex with penetration into the peritonealcavity, and received suture closure immediately. For the patient with 3 rectal lesions, the 1.0 cm lesion received a full-thickness resection and the other 2 lesions received submucosal resection. No postoperative complication occurred. Postoperative pathology showed that there were 1 case of chronic inflammatory lesion, 4 cases of benign tumor, 3 cases of carcinoma in situ, 4 cases of neuroendocrine tumor, 6 cases of pT1 rectal cancer, 2 cases of pT2 rectal cancer (both invading the superficial muscle layer). The median hospital stay was 6 (3-7) days. The postoperative follow-up was (7.2±3.8) months. No postoperative complication or recurrence was observed. Conclusion TEM with KeyPort access is safe, rapid and effective in the treatment of rectal tumors.

Objective:To investigate the current status of anticoagulant therapy and the incidence of ischemic and bleeding events in hospitalized patients aged 90 years and over with non-valvular atrial fibrillation(NVAF).Methods:We retrospectively collected clinical data, antithrombotic treatment strategies, in-hospital ischemic stroke and bleeding events from NVAF patients(≥90 years)who were admitted to our hospital from June 2014 to August 2018.Based on the CHA 2DS 2-VASc score(2, 3, and ≥4 respectively), patients were divided into three ischemic risk groups, and antithrombotic treatment strategies and in-hospital ischemic stroke events were compared between the three groups.Alternatively, patients were divided into the high bleeding risk group(HAS-BLED score ≥3, )and the non-high bleeding risk group(HAS-BLED score ≤2), and antithrombic treatment strategies and the major bleeding events were compared between the two groups. Results:Among the 223 hospitalized NVAF patients aged 90 years and over, 42.6% of them received anticoagulant treatment, 25.6% received antiplatelet drugs, and 31.8% received non-antithrombotic treatment.With the increase of the CHA 2DS 2-VASc score, there was a trend of declined rates of non-antithrombotic treatment among the three ischemic risk groups(47.4%, 42.9%, 26.4%, P=0.06), and the rates of in-hospital ischemic stroke were similar among groups(10.5%, 12.2%, 15.5%, P=0.75). Moreover, compared with the non-high bleeding risk group, patients in the high bleeding risk group more frequently received anticoagulant treatment(47.2% vs.38.3%)and less frequently received non-antithrombotic therapy(28.7% vs.34.7%). There was no significant difference in antithrombotic treatment strategies( P=0.39)or rate of in-hospital major bleeding events(13.0% vs.10.2%, P=0.51). However, the rate of in-hospital major bleeding events was significantly higher in those with concurrent infections(16.8% vs.6.4%, P=0.02)or respiratory failure(21.3% vs.8.0%, P=0.01). Conclusions:The rate of anticoagulant use in NVAF patients aged 90 years and over is too low during hospitalization, and anticoagulant therapy should be standardized.In addition to the HAS-BLED score, we should consider the complications that increase the bleeding risk, such as infections and respiratory failure, when evaluating the bleeding risk.

Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of KeyPort access and traditional transanal endoscopic microsurgery(TEM) in the treatment of rectal tumors.Methods:In this study, 36 cases of rectal tumors were treated by KeyPort TEM access and 52 cases by traditional TEM. Tumor type, size, distance from anal edge, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization time, specimen quality and complications were compared between the two groups.Results:There were no significant differences in tumor type, size, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization time, complications, recurrence and metastasis rate between the two groups. The distance between lower cutting edge to the anus in KeyPort access group was significantly greater than that of traditional TEM group[(6.7±1.9) vs. (5.1±1.8) cm , t=3.901, P<0.001]. All the surgeries in the KeyPort access group were completed. While two cases of in traditional TEM group were coverted to other surgical approaches. All patients in the KeyPort group had normal anal function in the early postoperative period, while 2 patients in the traditional TEM group suffered anal function impairment. Conclusion:TEM by KeyPort access is safer and more effective then traditional TEM, as well as more generous indications.