Objective To examine the effects of different pre-treatment nutritional status and inflammatory markers on acute adverse reactions in esophageal cancer patients during concurrent intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and chemotherapy.Methods The acute adverse reactions of 338 eligible esophageal cancer patients who received concurrent IMRT and chemotherapy in our hospital from 2006 to 2014 were reviewed.The effects of different pre-treatment nutritional status, such as body mass index level (BMI), albumin level (ALB), total lymphocyte count (TLC), the presence or absence of anemia, and inflammatory indicators including neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR), on acute adverse reactions in the patients were examined.Data were analyzed using the chi-square test with continuity correction and logistic regression analysis.Results The incidence rate of malnutrition in the patients based on their nutritional status was 5.62%-54.14%.The incidence rate of grade≥2 acute radiation esophagitis (RE) was significantly higher in the low ALB group than in the normal ALB group (P=0.000).The incidence rate of adverse reactions in the hematologic system increased as TLC decreased (P=0.006), but the incidence rate of acute radiation pneumonitis (RP) was reduced as TLC decreased (P=0.001).In addition, the incidence rate of grade ≥2 acute RE was significantly higher in the anemia group than in the non-anemia group.Inflammatory marker analysis demonstrated that the incidence rate of acute RE was significantly higher in the high NLR group and high PLR group than in the low NLR group and low PLR group (P=0.000 and P=0.024, respectively).Logistic regression analysis of nutritional status and inflammatory markers showed that TLC was an independent risk factor for acute adverse reactions in the hematologic system (P=0.001), and ALB and PLR were independent risk factors for acute RE (P=0.017 and P=0.011,respectively).Conclusions Nutritional status and inflammatory markers are associated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy-induced acute adverse reactions in esophageal carcinoma patients, and hence may be valuable indicators of acute adverse reactions during treatment.In addition, nutritional treatment and support care should be actively provided to the patients to prevent the development of acute adverse reactions during treatment.

Objective To investigate the clinical effect of induction chemotherapy plus concurrent radiochemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through a meta-analysis.Methods CBM, CNKI, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMbase were searched for the articles on comparison between induction chemotherapy plus concurrent radiochemotherapy and concurrent radiochemotherapy for patients with locally advanced NSCLC.According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the data on short-term outcome and survival were collected.A Meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the clinical effect of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent radiochemotherapy.Results A total of 5 articles were included, which involved 845 patients.The results showed that the short-term outcome and the 2-and 3-year survival rates were similar between patients receiving induction chemotherapy plus concurrent radiochemotherapy and those receiving concurrent radiochemotherapy ( OR=0.875, 95% CI 0.507-1.510, P=0.631;HR=0.770, 95% CI 0.515-1.151, P=0.203;HR=0.809, 95% CI 0.559-1.172, P=0.262), but the patients receiving induction chemotherapy plus concurrent radiochemotherapy showed a significantly higher incidence rate of grade ≥ 3 leukopenia than those receiving concurrent radiochemotherapy alone ( OR=0.637, 95% CI 0.435-0.931, P=0.020).Conclusions Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent radiochemotherapy shows no significant advantages over concurrent radiochemotherapy alone in the short-term outcome and 2-and 3-year survival rates, but it significantly increases myelosuppression.Since there are few studies involving a limited number of cases included in this analysis, more multicenter randomized trials are needed to provide more detailed data and further clarify the clinical value of induction chemotherapy plus concurrent radiochemotherapy.

OBJECTIVETo explore the expression of hypoxia inducible factor-1α(HIF-1α) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and its correlation with clinicopathological features.

METHODSOriginal literatures in foreign languages regarding correlation between HIF-1α and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were identified from Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase database, and Chinese original literatures were from CBM, CNKI. All analyses were performed by Stata 11.0 software. Histological grade, degree of differentiation, T stage, lymph node metastasis, tumor stage, lymphatic invasion and vascular invasion were analyzed using pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTSA total of 14 studies including 1 121 patients were enrolled in this meta analysis. Comparing with normal tissue, the expression of HIF-1α in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma was significantly enhanced (OR = 0.088, 95% CI: 0.061-0.129, P = 0.000); HIF-1α was significantly associated with T stage and lymph node metastasis (OR = 0.421, 95% CI: 0.222-0.798, P = 0.008; OR = 0.387, 95% CI: 0.207-0.725, P = 0.003). High expression of HIF-1α was correlated with an increased depth of tumor invasion, more lymph node metastasis and advanced tumor stage, whereas there was no relation to the degree of differentiation, histological grade, tumor stage, lymphatic invasion and vascular invasion.

CONCLUSIONSHigh expression of HIF-1α protein correlates with an increased risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. HIF-1α may be an indicator for T stage, lymph node metastasis and tumor stage, but further studies are needed.

Biomarkers, Tumor ; metabolism ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell ; metabolism ; pathology ; Confidence Intervals ; Esophageal Neoplasms ; metabolism ; pathology ; Humans ; Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha Subunit ; metabolism ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Odds Ratio

Objective To analyze the clinical efficacy,toxicity and survival prognosis of patients diagnosed with Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ locally advanced adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG) undergoing preoperative involved-field irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy. Methods A total of 45 cases were recruited in this prospective clinical trial. Prior to surgery, patients received 2 cycles of chemotherapy with XELOX and concurrent radiotherapy ( a total of 45 Gy in 25 fractions,5 times weekly). After 6-8 weeks,they underwent surgical resection. After the surgery,patients received 6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. The completion of preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, postoperative pathological status,TNM down-staging effect and adverse reactions were observed. Kaplan-Meier method was applied to estimate survival analysis. Results All 45 patients completed preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Among them, 39 patients completed 2 cycles of chemotherapy, and 6 patients completed 1 cycle of chemotherapy. The median time of surgical interval was 6 weeks. The R0resection rate was 96%.The pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 22%. The TNM down-staging rate was 69%.The incidence of acute radiation-induced esophagitis or gastritis was 44% and the incidence of radiation-induced pneumonitis was 7%. The incidence of grade 1-3 leukocytopenia,thrombocytopenia and neutropenia was 78%,47% and 44%,respectively. In terms of gastrointestinal reactions,the incidence of nausea,vomiting and loss of appetite was 62%,24% and 71%,respectively. No hematologic or nonhematologic adverse effects was observed at grade 4 or 5.The median follow-up time was 30 months. 11 patients died of cancer,1 patient was treatment-related death in the perioperative period and 1 patient died of pneumonia. The 1-,2-and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 90%,70% and 67%,respectively. The 1-,2-and 3-year overall survival rates were 95%,80% and 75%,respectively. The 1-,2-and 3-year local control rates were 95%,84% and 84%, respectively. The 1-, 2-and 3-year distant metastasis rates were 7%, 25% and 25%, respectively. Conclusions Preoperative involved-field irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy yields relatively high clinical efficacy and is well tolerated by patients with Siewert typeⅡandⅢlocally advanced AEG.Patients are recommended to receive 4 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery.

OBJECTIVETo explore the patterns and influencing factors of lymph node metastasis in limited esophageal small cell carcinoma (PESCC).

METHODSA total of 98 limited stage PESCC patients who underwent surgery were selected for this study. The lymph node metastasis ratio at different sites, depth of invasion, tumor length and other factors were analyzed to assess their influence on lymph node metastasis.

RESULTSAmong the 98 PESCC cases, 46 cases had lymph node metastasis (46.9%). 100 out of 833 lymph nodes had metastasis, with a metastasis ratio of 12.0%. For upper thoracic esophageal small cell carcinomas, lymph node metastasis ratios were 42.9%, 12.5%, 0 and 0 in the superior mediastinum, middle mediastinum, inferior mediastinum and abdominal cavity, respectively. In the middle thoracic PESCCs, the lymph node metastasis ratios were 18.8%, 7.7%, 15.7%, and 15.3%, respectively. In the lower thoracic PESCCs, the lymph node metastasis ratios were 0, 0, 27.3% and 23.5%, respectively. Lymph node metastasis rates in PESCCs at stages T1, T2, T3, T4 were 15.4%, 42.3%, 63.9%, and 80.0%, respectively. The lymph node metastasis ratios in PESCCs at stages T1, T2, T3, T4 were 2.0%, 8.3%, 17.8% and 25.0%, respectively. Lymph node metastasis rate and lymph node metastasis ratio at different T stages were of significant difference (P<0.05 for all). Lymph node metastasis rates in patients with tumor <3 cm, 3-5 cm, and >5 cm were 30.6%, 46.9% and 66.7%, respectively, and lymph node metastasis ratios were 5.4%, 11.0% and 21.1%, respectively. Lymph node metastasis rate and lymph node metastasis ratio in patients with different tumor length had significant differences (P<0.05 for all). Lymph node metastasis ratio was 11.6% in the Chr-A negative and weak positive group, much higher than 4.3% in the Chr-A positive group (P=0.013). There was a tendency that lymph node metastasis ratio of NSE-positive group was higher than that of NSE-negative and weak positive group (P=0.069). The logistic univariate analysis did not find high risk factors of distant lymph node metastasis (all P>0.05). Logistic multivariate analysis found that only depth of invasion was a risk factor of lymph node metastasis in limited PESCC (P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONSEsophagus small cell carcinomas sometimes have early lymph node metastases in many sites and distant range. The middle thoracic PESCCs tend to have extensive metastasis quite common in the upper mediastinal lymph nodes. Lower mediastinal and abdominal lymph node metastases are often seen in lower thoracic PESCCs. The depth of invasion and tumor length are main factors influencing mediastinal lymph node metastasis. The depth of invasion is an independent risk factor for lymph node metastasis.

Abdominal Cavity ; Carcinoma, Small Cell ; pathology ; secondary ; Esophageal Neoplasms ; pathology ; Humans ; Lymph Nodes ; pathology ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Mediastinum ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neoplasm Invasiveness ; Risk Factors

To examine the expression of vasohibin-1, metastasis-associated in colon cancer-1 (MACC1) and KAI1 proteins in serous ovarian cancer and their clinical significance.
 Methods: In 124 specimens of serous ovarian cancer (serous ovarian cancer group) and 30 specimens of ovarian serous cystadenoma (ovarian serous cystadenoma group), the expression of vasohibin-1, MACC1 and KAI1 protiens were detected by immunohistochemistry ElivisionTM method.
 Results: In the serous ovarian cancer group, the positive rates of vasohibin-1 and MACC1 proteins were 48.4% and 58.1%, respectively, which were both higher than those in the ovarian serous cystadenoma group (10.0% and 13.3%, respectively); while the positive rate of KAI1 protein in the serous ovarian cancer group was 33.9%, which was lower than that in the ovarian serous cystadenoma group (86.7%), there were significant differences between the 2 groups (all P<0.05). In the serous ovarian cancer group, the expression of the 3 proteins were closely related to the pathological grade, Federation International of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage and pelvic lymph node metastasis (all P<0.05). The KAI1 protein was negatively correlated with the levels of vasohibin-1 and MACC1 (r=-0.500, -0.600, respectively, both P<0.01); while there was a positive correlation between the vasohibin-1 and the MACC1 (r=0.518, P<0.01). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the over-expression of vasohibin-1, MACC1 and the low-expression of KAI1 protein were related to the survival rates (all P<0.05). Multi-factor analysis showed that the expression of vasohibin-1, KAI1 protein and the FIGO stage were independent prognosis factors for radical operation of serous ovarian cancer (RR=2.185, 3.893, 0.413; 95% CI=1.263-3.779, 2.190-6.921, 0.251-0.681; all P<0.05).
 Conclusion: The up-regulation of vasohibin-1, MACC1 and down-regulation of KAI1 in serous ovarian cancer are related to the tumor differentiation, clinical stage, metastasis and prognosis. Combined detection of these indexes is useful in predicting the progression and prognosis of serous ovarian cancer.
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial ; Cell Cycle Proteins ; Colonic Neoplasms ; Female ; Humans ; Kangai-1 Protein ; Neoplasm Staging ; Ovarian Neoplasms ; Prognosis ; Trans-Activators ; Transcription Factors