1.Innovation and management of curriculum system for medical postgraduates
Kun ZHAO ; Qiang WU ; Weidong LIU ; Yungui WANG ; Changkun LUO
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research 2011;10(2):147-150
In order to suit the trend of integration and development of modem medical disciplines and the reform trend of integration of curriculum system, the Third Military Medical University attempts to build a new curriculum system for medical postgraduates. The new system reveals the accuracy towards the teaching objects, the integration of curriculum structure, the update of the teaching contents and the diversity of the teaching methods. Besides, it combines the reform of teaching management, which will push forward the cultivation quality of the medical postgraduates.
2.Current quality management situation and administration countermeasure study of enterprises marketing corneal contact lens.
Yungui LIU ; Ying YAO ; Shihao SHANGGUAN ; Qun GU ; Wuming GAO ; Yaoshui CHEN
Chinese Journal of Medical Instrumentation 2014;38(3):213-215
OBJECTIVEStudy the current quality management situation of enterprises marketing corneal contact lens via systemic investigations and explore effective administration countermeasures in the future.
METHODSThe quality management indicators of sixty-two corneal contact lens marketing enterprises in Xuhui district of Shanghai were systematically investigated and enterprises of different operation models was compared and analyzed.
RESULTSWholesale enterprises and retail chain enterprises are apparently better than independent enterprises almost in all facets.
CONCLUSIONFacilitate market accession of corneal contact lens marketing enterprises, encourage the business model of retail chain, enhance supervision of corneal contact lens marketing enterprises, especially independent franchisors.
Contact Lenses ; economics ; Marketing ; Materials Management, Hospital
3.Expression of immunosuppressive receptor T cell immunoglobulin and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif domain on CD8 + T cells in silicosis patients with Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection
Yuzhen XU ; Miaoyao LIN ; Jingyu ZHOU ; Qianqian LIU ; Qingluan YANG ; Siran LIN ; Lingyun SHAO ; Wenhong ZHANG ; Lihong LI ; Xitian HUANG ; Yungui ZHANG ; Qiaoling RUAN
Chinese Journal of Infectious Diseases 2021;39(11):670-675
Objective:To explore the expression and clinical significance of immunosuppressive receptor T cell immunoglobulin and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif domain (TIGIT) on the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) in silicosis patients with Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Methods:August 2018, a total of 78 patients with silicosis (all were quarry workers in Sanmen County, Zhejiang Province) were enrolled and divided into silicosis combined with active pulmonary tuberculosis group (APTB group), silicosis combined with latent tuberculosis infection group (LTBI group), and simple silicosis with non-tuberculosis infection group (non-TB group). Flow cytometry was used to analyze the expressions of TIGIT, programmed death-1 (PD-1) and transcription factor T-bet on PBMC from patients. Mann-Whitney U test and Pearson correlations analysis were used for statistical analysis. Results:Among the 78 patients, eight were in the APTB group, 24 in the LTBI group, and 46 in the non-TB group. The expressions of PD-1 and TIGIT on CD8 + T cells in the APTB group (29.45%(16.78%) and 65.40%(12.12%), respectively) were significantly higher than those in the LTBI group (17.40%(11.17%) and 48.30%(28.75%), respectively; U=23.500 and 43.500, respectively, P=0.000 8 and 0.020 5, respectively) and non-TB group (15.95%(12.46%) and 45.30%(19.75%), respectively; U=64.000 and 69.000, respectively, P=0.002 3 and 0.003 8, respectively), and the differences were all statistically significant. The expression of TIGIT was positively correlated with PD-1 on CD8 + T cells in silicosis patients ( r=0.434 3, P<0.01). The proportion of PD-1 + TIGIT + CD8 + T cells in the APTB group (19.90%(22.67%)) was significantly higher than those in the non-TB group (11.55%(11.29%), U=76.500, P=0.007 1) and LTBI group (11.55%(10.53%), U=41.000, P=0.015 4), while the proportion of PD-1 -TIGIT -CD8 + T cells in the APTB group (30.60%(12.90%)) was significantly lower than non-TB group (48.90%(18.98%), U=58.000, P=0.001 3) and LTBI group (47.20%(24.59%), U=41.000, P=0.015 4). The differences were all statistically significant. The expression of T-bet on the peripheral blood CD8 + T cells in the APTB group (29.45%(16.78%)) was higher than that in the non-TB group (15.95%(12.46%)) and the LTBI group (17.40%(11.17%)), and the differences were both statistically significant ( U=46.500 and 46.000, respectively, P=0.000 3 and 0.028 3, respectively). The expression of T-bet on CD8 + T cells was positively correlated with TIGIT on CD8 + T cells ( r=0.456 7, P<0.01). The expression of T-bet on PD-1 + TIGIT + CD8 + T cells in the APTB group (65.40%(12.12%)) was higher than those in the LTBI group (48.30%(28.75%), U=23.500, P=0.000 8) and non-TB group (45.30%(19.75%), U=65.000, P=0.002 6), and the differences were both statistically significant. Conclusion:The immunosuppressive receptor PD-1 and TIGIT are highly expressed on CD8 + T cells in silicosis patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis, which indicates CD8 + T cells exhaustion in these population, while the highly co-expression of T-bet suggests the exhausted subsets may have reversed potentiality.
4.A multicenter study on the revalidation of validated conversion factor for the conversion of BCRABL(P210)transcript levels to the international scale in chronic myeloid leukemia.
Yazhen QIN ; Daoxin MA ; Yungui WANG ; Lili WANG ; Yue WANG ; Shengwei LIU ; Xiaojun LU ; Xiaoqing LI ; Jiannong CEN ; Min XIAO ; Zhenxing LIN ; Suxia GENG ; Chao LIANG ; Hui CHEN ; Cong HAN ; Wei HAN ; Xiaojun HUANG
Chinese Journal of Hematology 2015;36(10):814-817
OBJECTIVETo revalidate the conversion factor(CF)for the conversion of BCR-ABL (P210)transcript levels to the international scale(BCR- ABLIS)in chronic myeloid leukemia(CML) which validated before.
METHODSPeking University People's Hospital(PKUPH)prepared the exchange samples for revalidation of CFs of 15 laboratories which validated nine or eighteen months ago. The fresh BCR-ABL(P210)(+)bone morrow or peripheral blood nucleated cells were diluted with BCR-ABL (P210)(-)cells to achieve different BCR- ABL levels, totally 16 sets and 24 samples per set were prepared. TRIzol reagent was added in each tube. Each laboratory tested BCR-ABL transcript levels of one set of samples. Agreement between BCR-ABLIS of each laboratory and PKUPH was assessed by the Bland- Altman method. For laboratories which did not meet the criteria of revalidation, linear regression equation was derived after the samples with maximum BCR-ABL deviation were removed until R²>0.98, then new CF was calculated.
RESULTS10 laboratories met the revalidation criteria with both bias within ±1.4 fold and 95% limits of agreement within ±6 folds, and their CFs still could be used for accurately conversion of BCR-ABLIS. New CFs were recalculated as of 1.8-6.3 folds of their previous CFs in 5 laboratories not met the criteria.
CONCLUSIONRevalidation of CF by sample exchange among laboratories was necessary for accurate and continuous application of BCR-ABLIS, which not only tested the validity of CF acquired before but also calculated new available CFs for those with invalid CFs.
Bone Marrow Cells ; Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl ; genetics ; Humans ; Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive ; diagnosis ; genetics
5. An interlaboratory comparison study on the detection of RUNX1-RUNX1T1 fusion transcript levels and WT1 transcript levels
Yazhen QIN ; Liwen ZHU ; Shuang LIN ; Suxia GENG ; Shengwei LIU ; Hui CHENG ; Chengye WU ; Min XIAO ; Xiaoqing LI ; Ruiping HU ; Lili WANG ; Haiyan LIU ; Daoxin MA ; Tao GUAN ; Yuanxin YE ; Ting NIU ; Jiannong CEN ; Lisha LU ; Li SUN ; Tonghua YANG ; Yungui WANG ; Tao LI ; Yue WANG ; Qinghua LI ; Xiaosu ZHAO ; Lingdi LI ; Wenmin CHEN ; Lingyu LONG ; Xiaojun HUANG
Chinese Journal of Hematology 2019;40(11):889-894
Objective:
To investigate the current status and real performance of the detection of RUNX1-RUNX1T1 fusion transcript levels and WT1 transcript levels in China through interlaboratory comparison.
Methods:
Peking University People’s Hospital (PKUPH) prepared the samples for comparison. That is, the fresh RUNX1-RUNX1T1 positive (+) bone morrow nucleated cells were serially diluted with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 negative (-) nucleated cells from different patients. Totally 23 sets with 14 different samples per set were prepared. TRIzol reagent was added in each tube and thoroughly mixed with cells for homogenization. Each laboratory simultaneously tested RUNX1-RUNX1T1 and WT1 transcript levels of one set of samples by real-time quantitative PCR method. All transcript levels were reported as the percentage of RUNX1-RUNX1T1 or WT1 transcript copies/ABL copies. Spearman correlation coefficient between the reported transcript levels of each participated laboratory and those of PKUPH was calculated.
Results:
①RUNX1-RUNX1T1 comparison: 9 samples were (+) and 5 were (-) , the false negative and positive rates of the 20 participated laboratories were 0 (0/180) and 5% (5/100) , respectively. The reported transcript levels of all 9 positive samples were different among laboratories. The median reported transcript levels of 9 positive samples were from 0.060% to 176.7%, which covered 3.5-log. The ratios of each sample’s highest to the lowest reported transcript levels were from 5.5 to 12.3 (one result which obviously deviated from other laboratories’ results was not included) , 85% (17/20) of the laboratories had correlation coefficient ≥0.98. ②WT1 comparison: The median reported transcript levels of all 14 samples were from 0.17% to 67.6%, which covered 2.6-log. The ratios of each sample’s highest to the lowest reported transcript levels were from 5.3-13.7, 62% (13/21) of the laboratories had correlation coefficient ≥0.98. ③ The relative relationship of the reported RUNX1-RUNX1T1 transcript levels between the participants and PKUPH was not always consistent with that of WT1 transcript levels. Both RUNX1-RUNX1T1 and WT1 transcript levels from 2 and 7 laboratories were individually lower than and higher than those of PKUPH, whereas for the rest 11 laboratories, one transcript level was higher than and the other was lower than that of PKUPH.
Conclusion
The reported RUNX1-RUNX1T1 and WT1 transcript levels were different among laboratories for the same sample. Most of the participated laboratories reported highly consistent result with that of PKUPH. The relationship between laboratories of the different transcript levels may not be the same.