Background: Although data on post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) conditions are extensive, the prognostic factors affecting symptom duration in non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19 are currently not well known. We aimed to investigate the various prognostic factors affecting symptom duration among outpatients with COVID-19. Methods: Data were analyzed from 257 patients who were diagnosed with mild COVID-19 and visited the ‘post-COVID-19 outpatient clinic’ between April and December 2022 after a mandatory isolation period. The symptom duration was measured from diagnosis to symptom resolution. Laboratory and pulmonary function test results from their first visit were collected. Results: The mean age of patients was 55.7 years, and the median symptom duration was 57 days. The development of post-COVID-19 conditions (> 12 weeks) were significantly correlated with not using antiviral drugs, leukocytosis (white blood cell > 10,000/µL), lower 25(OH)D 3 levels, forced vital capacity (FVC) < 90% predicted, and presence of dyspnea and anxiety/depression. Additionally, in multivariable Cox regression analysis, not using antiviral drugs, lower 25(OH)D 3 levels, and having dyspnea were poor prognostic factors for longer symptom duration. Particularly, vitamin D deficiency (< 20 ng/mL) and not using antivirals during the acute phase were independent poor prognostic factors for both post-COVID-19 condition and longer symptom duration. Conclusion The non-use of antivirals, lower 25(OH)D 3 levels, leukocytosis, FVC < 90% predicted, and the presence of dyspnea and anxiety/depression symptoms could be useful prognostic factors for predicting post-COVID-19 condition in outpatients with COVID-19. We suggest that the use of antiviral agents during the acute phase and vitamin D supplements might help reduce COVID-19 symptom duration.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to report the opinions of the students on the OSCE and how to improve this exam. METHODS: 135 students at Pusan National University School of Medicine were asked to perform the OSCE. Data were collected through a questionnaire (Cronbach's alpha = .965). Analysis was done using SPSS statistics program. RESULTS: In summary, the students thought the content of the OSCE was all very important but practically, it was difficult to perform due to a lack of practice. Through this exam, thestudents said that they realized their insufficiencies, and they felt more motivated to learn. The BLS station scored very high in the 'validity of contents', 'validity of difficulty', 'validity of time limit', and 'fostering learning motivation'. The opinions of the students on the areas requiring improvement were: the control of information exchange among them, the connection with training, the establishment of a permanent training space, and increasing exposure to the exam. CONCLUSION: The OSCE, now more than ever, definitely has an educating role in preparing physicians for clinical practice.
Busan* ; Humans ; Learning ; Surveys and Questionnaires

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to investigate the effect of direct verbal feedback from an expert during endotracheal intubation skills training using a mannequin compared to practice alone without feedback. METHODS: 154 fourth-year medical students at the Pusan National University were divided into control or feedback groups. Both groups were taught by experts using a mannequin at a clinical skills learning center. The feedback group (n=66) received verbal feedback from the expert throughout training. Skills acquisition was tested during a Clinical Performance Examination. RESULTS: There were no differences between the control and feedback groups in terms of prior experiences with endotracheal intubation, confidence level to perform the skill, and grades received from previous clinical clerkships. The average score of the feedback group was significantly higher than that of the control group (14.06 versus 11.98, p<0.05). When the students were divided into 'exceeds expectations', 'meets expectations' and 'needs development' groups according to a global rating, more students from the feedback group were in the 'exceeds expectations' group and less were in the 'needs development' group compared to the control group (p<0.05). The results showed no significant relation with training date. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that direct verbal feedback from an expert during training significantly improves the performance of endotracheal intubation skill. Feedback acts as an essential component of clinical education; and its effect is prominent, especially in students who require further development.
Busan ; Clinical Clerkship ; Clinical Competence ; Education ; Humans ; Intubation, Intratracheal* ; Learning ; Manikins ; Students, Medical

An 80-year-old male with nausea and poor oral intake was referred for evaluation of hyponatremia. Primary adrenal insufficiency was diagnosed by a rapid adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation test. The cause of the adrenal insufficiency was revealed to be adrenal tuberculosis presenting as a bilateral adrenal mass on computed tomography imaging. During the first few months of treatment, the size of the tuberculous mass increased and spread to an adjacent area, and further adrenal hormone replacement was needed. In addition, there was a newly developed tuberculous abscess in a nearby psoas muscle with a duodenal fistula. Thus, we report a case of a long-term clinical course of Addison's disease with changes in hormone replacement as a result of active adrenal tuberculosis, together with a review of the literature.
Abscess* ; Addison Disease* ; Adrenal Glands ; Adrenal Insufficiency ; Adrenocorticotropic Hormone ; Aged, 80 and over ; Fistula* ; Humans ; Hyponatremia ; Male ; Nausea ; Psoas Muscles* ; Tuberculosis*

PURPOSE: Older patient populations commonly have cognitive impairment, which might impact decisional capacity. We examined patients and family caregivers preferences for family involvement in treatment decision making assuming different level of cognitive impairment, and sought to explore the factors associated with the preferences and the degree to which patients and family members agree on preferences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 358 elderly cancer patient and caregiver dyads were recruited from the 11 cancer centers in Korea andwere asked to express their preferences forfamily involvement in treatment decision making using hypothetical scenarios with three different levels of cognitive status (intact, mild impairment, and severe impairment). RESULTS: Both patients and family caregivers preferred greater family dominance in treatment decision makingwith the increasing the level of cognitive impairment (39.7%, 60.9%, and 86.6% for patients and 45.0%, 66.2%, and 89.7% for caregivers in each scenarios). Patient and family caregiver concordance in decisional control preference was small for all three scenarios (weighted κ=0.32, κ=0.26, and κ=0.36, respectively). Higher patient education was associated with preference for patient dominance in treatment decision in conditions of both mild and severe cognitive impairment. The association of higher patient education and patient-caregiver preference concordance was positive with intact cognition, while it was negative with severe cognitive impairment. CONCLUSION: Decision control preferences were affected by hypothesized cognitive status of the patients. Findings from our study would be helpful to develop effective strategy for optimizing family involvement in cancer treatment decision in the context of deteriorating cognitive function of the patients.
Aged ; Caregivers* ; Cognition Disorders ; Cognition* ; Decision Making* ; Humans ; Korea ; Patient Education as Topic

PURPOSE: Delivering bad news is a task that occurs in most medical practices, rendering communication skills essential to competent patient care. The purpose of this study was to identify factors that are associated with scores on an assessment of medical students' communication skills in delivering bad news to help develop more effective curricula to enhance these essential skills. METHODS: One hundred fifty-four fourth-year medical students at Pusan National University were included. Skills for delivering bad news were assessed using the SPIKES protocol in the CPX. The students were categorized into three main groups according to total scores: 'Exceeds expectations (E)', 'Meets expectations (M)', and 'Needs development (N)'. Personal experiences with misfortune and attitudes toward breaking bad news were surveyed, and school records were collected. The differences between the E and N groups were analyzed based on performance test and survey. RESULTS: Compared with students in the N group, E group students acquired significantlyhigher scores on the items of Perception, Invitation, a division of Knowledge, Empathy and Strategy, and Summary but not on Setting and a part of Knowledge. E group students had better records in classes and clerkships. There were no differences in personal experiences and attitudes toward breaking bad news between the groups. CONCLUSION: Personal experience with delivering bad news does not guarantee better communication, and attitudes toward this task do not influence student performance. We expect that deliberate educational programs will have a positive impact on improving communication skills for delivering bad news.
Curriculum ; Empathy ; Humans ; Patient Care ; Personality Inventory ; Professional-Family Relations ; Students, Medical

Background: There is a need to update the cardiovascular (CV) Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score to reflect the current practice in sepsis. We previously proposed the modified CV SOFA score from data on blood pressure, norepinephrine equivalent dose, and lactate as gathered from emergency departments. In this study, we externally validated the modified CV SOFA score in multicenter intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Methods: A multicenter retrospective observational study was conducted on ICU patients at six hospitals in Korea. We included adult patients with sepsis who were admitted to ICUs. We compared the prognostic performance of the modified CV/total SOFA score and the original CV/total SOFA score in predicting 28-day mortality. Discrimination and calibration were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the calibration curve, respectively. Results: We analyzed 1,015 ICU patients with sepsis. In overall patients, the 28-day mortality rate was 31.2%. The predictive validity of the modified CV SOFA (AUROC, 0.712; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.677–0.746; P < 0.001) was significantly higher than that of the original CV SOFA (AUROC, 0.644; 95% CI, 0.611–0.677). The predictive validity of modified total SOFA score for 28-day mortality was significantly higher than that of the original total SOFA (AUROC, 0.747 vs. 0.730; 95% CI, 0.715–0.779; P = 0.002). The calibration curve of the original CV SOFA for 28-day mortality showed poor calibration. In contrast, the calibration curve of the modified CV SOFA for 28-day mortality showed good calibration. Conclusion In patients with sepsis in the ICU, the modified SOFA score performed better than the original SOFA score in predicting 28-day mortality.