1.Efficacy comparison of small-incision horizontal space nuclear splitting surgery with phacoemulsification in the treatment of hard nuclear cataract
Furong LIAO ; Lei YANG ; Yumeng BAO
International Eye Science 2025;25(6):958-961
AIM: To investigate the efficacy of small-incision horizontal space nuclear splitting surgery and phacoemulsification combined with regional refractive multifocal intraocular lens(MIOL)implantation in the treatment of hard nuclear cataract.METHODS:A retrospective analysis was performed for 288 patients(288 eyes)with hard nuclear cataract who admitted to our hospital from January 2022 to December 2023, and they were divided into control group(144 eyes treated with phacoemulsification and regional refractive MIOL)and observation group(144 eyes treated with small-incision horizontal space nuclear splitting surgery and regional refractive MIOL)according to different treatment methods. The operation time, pre- and post-operative best corrected visual acuity, astigmatism, central corneal thickness, corneal endothelial density, tear film function, and complications were compared between the two groups.RESULTS:There was no difference in operation time between the two groups(P>0.05). There was no difference in the preoperative and 3 mo postoperative best corrected visual acuity(all P>0.05), and the best corrected visual acuity of the two groups at 3 mo postoperatively was improved compared with the preoperative level(all P<0.05). There were differences in central corneal thickness, corneal endothelial density and astigmatism between the two groups at 1 wk and 3 mo after surgery(all P<0.05). There were differences in breakup time(BUT)and ocular surface disease index(OSDI)scores between the two groups at 1 wk after surgery(all P<0.001), and the incidence of complications in the observation group(4.2%)was significantly lower than that in the control group(18.1%; P<0.001).CONCLUSION:Both surgical methods can effectively treat patients with hard nuclear cataracts, and small-incision horizontal space nuclear splitting surgery combined with regional refractive MIOL implantation has less corneal damage and fewer complications.
2.Effects of different nucleus chopping methods on cornea and tear inflammatory indicators in patients with hard nucleus cataract
Li JIANG ; Lei YANG ; Yuanyuan ZHONG ; Furong LIAO ; Yumeng BAO ; Pengcheng ZHANG
International Eye Science 2025;25(6):951-957
AIM: To compare the effects of different nucleus chopping methods on the central corneal thickness, corneal endothelial cell(CEC)count and tear inflammatory indicators in patients with hard nucleus cataract.METHODS: Retrospective study. Totally 89 patients(89 eyes)with hard nucleus cataract who treated in our hospital were included from January 2020 to December 2022. According to different intraoperative nucleus chopping methods, the patients were divided into reverse prechop group(46 eyes)and phaco-chop group(43 eyes). The total effective rate of surgery and visual acuity recovery were compared between the two groups. Corneal related indicators(central corneal thickness, CEC count, CEC area), tear inflammatory indicators and tear film function [tear film break-up time(BUT), Chinese Dry Eye Questionnaire(CDEQ), Schirmer Ⅰ test(SⅠt)] were observed before and after surgery in both groups, and the degree of corneal edema was evaluated.RESULTS: The effective phaco time, phaco energy and cumulative complex energy parameters in the phaco-chop group were longer or higher than those in the reverse prechop group(P<0.05). The macular retinal thickness in the reverse prechop group at 7 d and 1 mo after surgery was thinner than that in the phaco-chop group, the central corneal thickness at 3 and 7 d after surgery was also thinner than that in the phaco-chop group, the CEC count at 3 mo after surgery was more than that in the phaco-chop group, the CEC loss rate was lower than that in the phaco-chop group, and the CEC area at 3 mo after surgery was smaller than that in the phaco-chop group(P<0.05). The levels of tear TNF-α and IL-6 at 7 d and 1 mo after surgery in the reverse prechop group were lower than those in the phaco-chop group(P<0.05). The BUT at 1 and 3 mo after surgery was longer in the reverse prechop group than that in the phaco-chop group(P<0.05). The CDEQ score in the reverse prechop group was lower than that in the phaco-chop group at 1 and 3 mo after surgery(P<0.05). The SⅠt at 1 and 3 mo after surgery was higher in the reverse prechop group compared with that in the phaco-chop group(P<0.05). The degree of corneal edema at 1 d after surgery was milder in the reverse prechop group than that in the phaco-chop group(P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with phaco-chop, the application of reverse-chopper prechop combined with phacoemulsification can better reduce the ultrasonic energy in the treatment of hard nuclear cataract, and it is more conducive to reducing the postoperative inflammatory degree, improving the tear film function and relieving the corneal edema degree.