To investigate the therapeutic effect of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) on supination external rotation (SER) ankle fractures (AF) and its impact on ankle joint function and range of motion in patients.Methods:The observation group patients were treated with ORIF, while the control group patients were treated with manual reduction combined with plaster external fixation. Both groups of patients were followed up after 3 and 6 months of treatment. Compare the ankle joint function levels of two groups of patients before treatment and after 3 and 6 months of treatment (Kofood score, AOFAS score, Olerud Molander subjective ankle score (OMAS)). Compare the joint range of motion (relative peak force, torque acceleration energy, endurance) between two groups of patients after 3 and 6 months of treatment. Compare the clinical indicators and incidence of adverse events between two groups of patients after 6 months of treatment. T-test was used for comparison between two groups. Multiple group comparisons were conducted using analysis of variance, while pairwise comparisons were conducted using Dunnett-t test. Comparison of count data between groups using χ2 inspections or Fisher exact test. Results:Before treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in the Kofoed score, AOFAS score, and OMAS score between the two groups of patients (all P>0.05). The Kofoed scores of patients in the observation group before treatment and at 3 and 6 months of treatment were (53.78±6.40), (76.73±4.12), and (89.07±5.78) points, respectively. The control group was (52.22±7.08), (71.68±4.82), and (84.05±5.45) points, respectively. The Kofoed scores of patients in both groups were higher than before treatment at 3 and 6 months of treatment (all P<0.05), and the observation group was higher than the control group (all P<0.01).The AOFAS scores of patients in the observation group before treatment and at 3 and 6 months of treatment were (70.13±5.39), (81.62±4.25), and (92.05±4.15) points, respectively. The control group was (69.85±5.41), (79.08±4.60), and (88.92±4.43) points, respectively. The AOFAS scores of patients in both groups were higher than before treatment at 3 and 6 months of treatment (all P<0.05), and the observation group was significantly higher than the control group (all P<0.01).The OMAS scores of the observation group patients before treatment and at 3 and 6 months of treatment were (53.43±5.07), (76.14±4.52), and (85.68±4.14) points, respectively. The control group was (54.42±4.86), (71.39±3.94), and (81.78±4.15) points, respectively. The OMAS scores of the two groups of patients at 3 and 6 months of treatment were higher than before treatment (all P<0.05), and the observation group was higher than the control group (all P<0.01). The fracture healing time (38.85±4.50) days and complete weight-bearing time (66.62±7.14) days of the observation group patients were shorter than those of the control group patients (49.42±5.43) days and (74.39±6.75) days, and the differences between the two groups were statistically significant (t-values were 12.89 and 6.80, respectively, all P<0.01); There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups of patients (5.41% (4/74) and 9.46% (7/74)), χ2=0.88, P=0.347). Conclusion:ORIF has a good therapeutic effect on SER-AF patients, promotes ankle joint function recovery, and has a low incidence of adverse events, indicating good safety.

Objective:To investigate the value of generative adversarial networks-based PET image reconstruction in improving the quality of low-dose 18F-FDG PET images and lesion detection in pediatric patients. Methods:Retrospective analysis of 61 PET images of children (38 males, 23 females, age (4.0±3.5) years) who underwent 18F-FDG total-body PET/CT imaging in Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University from August 2021 to December 2021 was performed. The low-dose images (30 s, 20 s, 10 s) of all children extracted by list mode were input into the generative adversarial networks for deep learning (DL) reconstruction to obtain the corresponding simulated standard full-dose images (DL-30 s, DL-20 s, DL-10 s). The semi-quantitative parameters of the liver blood pool and primary lesion of standard full-dose 120 s, 30 s, 20 s, 10 s, DL-30 s, DL-20 s, and DL-10 s images were measured. The target-to-background ratio (TBR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and CV were calculated. The 5-point Likert scale was used for subjective scoring of image quality, and the detective abilities for positive lesions of each groups were compared. The sensitivities and positive predictive values of positive lesions detection were calculated. Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test and χ2 test were used for data analyses. Results:CNR of the 30 s, 20 s, and 10 s groups were lower than those of DL-30 s, DL-20 s, and DL-10 s groups, respectively ( z values: -3.58, -3.20, -3.65, all P<0.05). Score of DL-10 s group was significantly lower than those of 120 s, DL-30 s and DL-20 s groups (4(3, 4), 5(4, 5), 4(4, 5), 4(4, 5); H=97.70, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in TBR, CNR, CV, SUV max and SUV mean of lesions and liver blood pool in 120 s, DL-30 s, DL-20 s, and DL-10 s groups ( H values: 0.00-6.76, all P>0.05). The sensitivities of positive lesion detection in DL-30 s, DL-20 s, and DL-10 s groups were 97.83%(225/230), 96.96%(223/230), 95.65%(220/230), respectively, and the positive predictive values were 96.57%(225/233), 93.70%(223/238), 84.94%(220/259), respectively. The positive predictive value in DL-10 s group was lower than those in DL-30 s and DL-20 s groups ( χ2=23.51, P<0.001). There were more false-positive and false-negative lesions detected by DL-10 s group than those of DL-30 s and DL-20 s groups in different sites. Conclusion:Based on the generative adversarial networks, the image quality of DL-20 s group is high and can meet the clinical diagnostic requirements.