1.Clinicopathologic features, treatment, prognosis and prognostic factors of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the endometrium: a retrospective analysis of 42 cases from the Kansai Clinical Oncology Group/Intergroup study in Japan
Harunobu MATSUMOTO ; Mototsugu SHIMOKAWA ; Kaei NASU ; Ayumi SHIKAMA ; Takaya SHIOZAKI ; Masayuki FUTAGAMI ; Kentaro KAI ; Hiroaki NAGANO ; Taisuke MORI ; Mitsutake YANO ; Norihiro SUGINO ; Etsuko FUJIMOTO ; Norihito YOSHIOKA ; Satoshi NAKAGAWA ; Muneaki SHIMADA ; Hideki TOKUNAGA ; Yuki YAMADA ; Tomohiko TSURUTA ; Kazuto TASAKI ; Ryutaro NISHIKAWA ; Shiho KUJI ; Takashi MOTOHASHI ; Kimihiko ITO ; Takashi YAMADA ; Norihiro TERAMOTO
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2019;30(6):e103-
OBJECTIVE: We conducted a retrospective, multi-institutional, collaborative study to accumulate cases of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the endometrium, to clarify its clinicopathologic features, treatment, prognosis and prognostic factors to collate findings to establish future individualized treatment regimens. To our knowledge, this is the largest case study and the first study to statistically analyze the prognosis of this disease. METHODS: At medical institutions participating in the Kansai Clinical Oncology Group/Intergroup, cases diagnosed at a central pathologic review as neuroendocrine carcinoma of the endometrium between 1995 and 2014 were enrolled. We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathologic features, treatment, prognosis and prognostic factors of this disease. RESULTS: A total of 65 cases were registered from 18 medical institutions in Japan. Of these, 42 (64.6%) cases were diagnosed as neuroendocrine carcinoma of the endometrium based on the central pathological review and thus included in the study. Advanced International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages (stage III and IV) and pure type small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma cases had a significantly worse prognosis. Upon multivariate analysis, only histologic subtypes and surgery were significant prognostic factors. Pure type cases had a significantly worse prognosis compared to mixed type cases and complete surgery cases had a significantly better prognosis compared to cases with no or incomplete surgery. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that complete surgery improves the prognosis of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the endometrium. Even among cases with advanced disease stages, if complete surgery is expected to be achieved, clinicians should consider curative surgery to improve the prognosis of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the endometrium.
Carcinoma, Large Cell
;
Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine
;
Carcinoma, Small Cell
;
Endometrial Neoplasms
;
Endometrium
;
Female
;
Gynecology
;
Japan
;
Medical Oncology
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
Obstetrics
;
Prognosis
;
Retrospective Studies
2.Dementia knowledge and attitudes of nursing undergraduate students—association between lifestyle background and practical training experience—
Hirohito NANBU ; Kouhei HAYASHI ; Fumiya TANJI ; Yuki TSURUTA ; Kazuki AWAJI ; Noriko NAKAI
Journal of Rural Medicine 2024;19(2):83-91
Objective: To clarify the association between dementia knowledge and attitudes, lifestyle backgrounds, and practical training experiences of nursing students, and examine the basic nursing education for dementia.Participants and Methods: A total of 412 first-to-fourth-year students at Nursing College A participated in the study. A cross-sectional survey was conducted regarding knowledge (15 questions) and attitudes (15 questions) related to dementia.Results: Consent was obtained from 158 individuals (The response rate was 38.3%). Significant items regarding dementia attitudes and cohabitation experiences were identified. Additionally, significant items regarding attitude toward dementia and care providing experiences were identified.Conclusion: Associations among attitude toward dementia, cohabitation experiences, and care providing experiences were determined. Knowledge and attitudes regarding dementia improved with practical training experience.
3.Advancing the Japanese Medical Education Journal: Academic Evolution and the Significance of Submission Guideline Revisions
Yuko TAKEDA ; Takuya SAIKI ; Michio SHIIBASHI ; Hiroshi NISHIGORI ; Makoto KIKUKAWA ; Yasushi MATSUYAMA ; Mariko NAKAMURA ; Takami MAENO ; Shizuma TSUCHIYA ; Rintaro IMAFUKU ; Akiteru TAKAMURA ; Jun TSURUTA ; Machiko YAGI ; Yuka MIYACHI ; Haruo OBARA ; Kazuya NAGASAKI ; Osamu NOMURA ; Yuki KATAOKA
Medical Education 2025;56(2):87-98
The role of academic journals evolves with the times. Academic publishing is diversifying, shifting from traditional paper-based formats to broader dissemination through open access. In response to these developments-and to contribute to ongoing progress in medical education-Medical Education (Japan) has undertaken a comprehensive revision of its submission guidelines. As of January 17, 2025, all submissions, peer reviews, and editorial processes are being conducted in accordance with the updated guidelines. The Editorial Board convened a round-table discussion to explore recent developments, beginning with the revision of the submission guidelines. This discussion elaborates on the journal's role and its relevance to the academic community, including society members, authors, and readers. It features statements from participating editorial committee members and highlights the key issues discussed, including the criteria each member uses to evaluate manuscripts. The aim is to offer insight into the journal's editorial stance and decision-making process.