STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study. PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical and radiological results of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) performed with cortical bone trajectory (CBT) pedicle screw insertion with those of TLIF using 'conventional' or percutaneous pedicle screw insertion. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: CBT is a new trajectory for pedicle screw insertion in the lumbar spine; clinical and radiological results of TLIF using pedicle screws inserted with CBT are unclear. METHODS: In total, 26 patients (11 males, 15 females) were enrolled in this retrospective study and divided into three groups: TLIF with pedicle screw insertion by conventional minimally invasive methods via the Wiltse approach (M-TLIF, n=10), TLIF with percutaneous pedicle screw insertion (P-TLIF, n=6), and TLIF with pedicle screw insertion with CBT (CBT-TLIF, n=10). Surgical results and preand postoperative radiological findings were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: Intraoperative blood loss was significantly less with CBT-TLIF (p=0.03) than with M-TLIF. Postoperative lordotic angles did not differ significantly among the three groups. Complete fusions were obtained in 10 of 12 levels (83%) with M-TLIF, in seven levels (100%) with P-TLIF, and in 10 of 11 levels (91%) with CBT-TLIF. On postoperative computed tomography, correct positioning was seen in 84.1% of M-TLIF screws, 88.5% of P-TLIF screws, and 90% of CBT-TLIF screws. CONCLUSIONS: CBT-TLIF resulted in less blood loss and a shorter operative duration than M-TLIF or P-TLIF. Postoperative rates of bone union, maintenance of lordotic angles, and accuracy of pedicle screw positions were similar among the three groups.
Case-Control Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Retrospective Studies ; Spine

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective and comparative study. PURPOSE: We assessed surgical treatment outcomes in patients with thoracic myelopathy due to ossification of the ligamentum flavum (OLF), and OLF combined with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) or vertebral fracture (VF) at the same level. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: OLF and OPLL cause severe thoracic myelopathy. Osteoporotic VF commonly occurs at the thoracolumbar junction. There have been no investigations of thoracic myelopathy due to OLF and VF. METHODS: Forty patients were divided among three groups: the OLF group (n=23): myelopathy due to OLF, the OLF+OPLL group (n=12): myelopathy due to OLF and OPLL, and the OLF+VF group (n=5): myelopathy due to OLF and VF. We recorded OLF, OPLL, and VF sites and operative procedures. Each patient’s neurological status, according to the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and walking ability were evaluated pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: Patients in the OLF+OPLL group were significantly younger than those in the other two groups. The preoperative JOA score was significantly lower in the OLF+VF than OLF group. The final JOA score was significantly lower in the OLF+VF than OLF and OLF+OPLL groups. The JOA score recovery rate was significantly lower in the OLF+VF than OLF group. Final walking ability was significantly worse in the OLF+OPLL and OLF+VF groups than in the OLF group and significantly worse in the OLF+VF than OLF+OPLL group. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic myelopathy due to OLF+VF occurs primarily in older females, who also exhibit worse preoperative and postoperative neurological status, and worse walking ability, than patients with thoracic myelopathy due to OLF or OLF+OPLL.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective comparative study. PURPOSE: To compare perioperative medical complications after posterior approach spinal instrumentation surgery for osteoporotic vertebral collapse (OVC) between patients with primary osteoporosis and those with secondary osteoporosis. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: With increased aging of society, the demand for instrumentation surgery for an osteoporotic spine has been increasing. However, no studies have compared the rates or severities of perioperative complications after spinal instrumentation surgery between patients with primary osteoporosis and those with secondary osteoporosis. METHODS: Ninety-one patients with OVC aged ≥50 years (23 males and 68 females) who underwent posterior approach vertebral replacement with cages or posterior spinal fusion combined with vertebroplasty were divided into primary (n=56) and secondary (n=35) osteoporosis groups. Bone mineral density (BMD), osteoporosis treatment prior to OVC, operative invasiveness, and perioperative medical complications were compared. RESULTS: Diabetes mellitus (51.4%) was the most common cause of secondary osteoporosis, followed by glucocorticoid use (22.9%). No significant differences were seen in terms of age, gender, BMD, osteoporosis treatment, or operative invasiveness, including the number of levels fused, estimated blood loss, and number of patients requiring transfusion. No significant difference in the incidence of perioperative complications were observed between the primary and secondary osteoporosis groups (16.1% vs. 22.9%). However, surgical site infection (SSI) was significantly more frequently seen in the secondary osteoporosis group (11.4%) than in the primary osteoporosis group (1.8%; p<0.05). One patient in the secondary osteoporosis group developed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection that ultimately required instrument removal. CONCLUSIONS: The overall incidence of perioperative medical complications after posterior approach spinal instrumentation surgery for OVC was comparable between the primary and secondary osteoporosis groups under conditions of similar background characteristics and operative invasiveness. However, SSI (particularly more severe cases) occurred more frequently in patients with secondary osteoporosis.
Aging ; Bone Density ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus ; Osteoporosis* ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Fusion ; Spine ; Surgical Wound Infection ; Vertebroplasty

OBJECTIVES: Glucocorticoid (GC) treatment inhibits activation of runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2), which is essential for osteoblast differentiation from stem cells. As a result, GC treatment results in bone loss, GC-induced osteoporosis (GIO), elevated fracture risk, and delayed bone healing. Bisphosphonates such as alendronate (ALN) are recommended for treating or preventing GIO, and lowintensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) facilitates fracture healing and maturation of regenerated bone. Combined therapy with ALN and LIPUS may stimulate cancellous bone healing in GIO rats. Here, we examined the effect of ALN and LIPUS on cancellous bone osteotomy repair in the proximal tibia of GIO rats. METHODS: Prednisolone (10 mg/kg body weight/day) was administered for 4 weeks to induce GIO in 6-month-old female Sprague-Dawley rats. Tibial osteotomy was then performed and daily subcutaneous injection of ALN (1-µg/kg body weight) was subsequently administered alone or in combination with LIPUS (20 min/day) for 2 or 4 weeks. RESULTS: ALN significantly increased bone mineral density (BMD) at 2 and 4 weeks, and ALN + LIPUS significantly increased BMD at 4 weeks. Bone union rates were significantly increased after 2 and 4 weeks ALN and ALN + LIPUS treatment. Lastly, ALN and ALN + LIPUS significantly increased the proportion of Runx2 positive cells at 4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: ALN monotherapy and combined ALN and LUPUS treatment augmented BMD and stimulated cancellous bone repair with increased Runx2 expression at the osteotomy site in GIO rats. However, the combined treatment had no additional effect on cancellous bone healing compared to ALN monotherapy.
Alendronate* ; Animals ; Bone Density ; Bone Diseases, Metabolic* ; Diphosphonates ; Female ; Fracture Healing ; Humans ; Infant ; Injections, Subcutaneous ; Osteoblasts ; Osteoporosis ; Osteotomy* ; Prednisolone ; Rats* ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Stem Cells ; Tibia* ; Transcription Factors ; Ultrasonic Waves*

OBJECTIVES: While it has been pointed out that an anteroposterior (AP) view of the lumbar spine may lead to overestimation of the bone mineral density (BMD), a lateral view is expected lead to the early detection of BMD loss on scanning cancellous bone. Vertebral fracture is often seen in aged osteoporotic patients, and it is important to prevent this fracture. Therefore, we aimed to identify the optimal site for BMD measurement to assess the risk of vertebral fracture. METHODS: Forty-seven female patients with fresh osteoporotic vertebral fracture and BMD measurements were included in this study (Fracture group). As a non-fractured control group, 218 female patients with BMD measurements were enrolled (Control group). We compared BMD values based on AP and lateral views of the lumbar spine from L2 to L4 and the femoral neck. With a lateral view of the lumbar spine, we measured both the total vertebral body and vertebral body center, mainly composed of cancellous bone. RESULTS: BMD of the AP lumbar spine in the Fracture group was significantly lower than in the Control group (P < 0.05). In the subanalyses for comparisons between age-matched fracture and control groups, BMD of only the AP lumbar spine in the Fracture group was significantly lower than in the Control group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: AP lumbar spine BMD is optimal for assessing vertebral fracture occurrence.
Bone Density* ; Female ; Femur Neck ; Humans ; Spine

OBJECTIVES: Reduced bone quality caused by vitamin C deficiency in older persons may lead to incidental fragility fractures during bisphosphonate treatment, although bisphosphonate increases bone mineral density (BMD). This study aimed to evaluate the effects of minodronate and ascorbic acid (Aa) on BMD, bone quality, and bone strength in Aa(-)deficient osteogenic disorder Shionogi (ODS) rats. METHODS: Six-month-old ODS rats were divided into four groups (n = 20 per group): (1) Aa supplementation (Aa(+)); (2) Aa(-)deficient (Aa(-)); (3) Aa supplementation and minodronate administration (Aa(+) + Mino); and (4) Aa(-)deficient and minodronate administration (Aa(-) + Mino). BMD, bone strength, bone histomorphometry, and bone quality determined using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy imaging (FTIRI) were evaluated after 4 and 8 weeks. RESULTS: BMD was significantly higher in the Aa(+) + Mino group than in the Aa(-) group (p < 0.05). Bone strength was significantly higher in the Aa(+) and Aa(+) + Mino groups than in the Aa(-) group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, bone strength was significantly higher in the Aa(+) + Mino group than in the Aa(-) + Mino group (p < 0.05). Minodronate treatment irrespective of Aa supplementation significantly decreased bone resorption compared with the Aa(+) and Aa(-) groups (p < 0.05). No significant differences in the parameters evaluated by FTIRI were observed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Aa supplementation improved bone strength in ODS rats. Combined treatment with minodronate and Aa, but not minodronate alone, improved bone strength and increased BMD. Aa is required for bone health because it is essential for osteoblast differentiation.
Animals ; Ascorbic Acid Deficiency ; Ascorbic Acid* ; Bone Density* ; Bone Resorption ; Humans ; Osteoblasts ; Rats* ; Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared ; Vitamins*

Objectives: Progressive and generalized loss of skeletal muscle mass (SMM) and strength are characteristics of sarcopenia. However, the impact of appendicular and trunk SMM and back extensor strength (BES) on spinal sagittal alignment remains unclear. Herein, we investigate the relationship between these factors and spinal sagittal alignment. Methods: In total, 202 women without vertebral fractures (median age, 66.9 years; interquartile range, 61.4–71.9 years) were analyzed at an orthopedic outpatient clinic. Pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and pelvic tilt (PT) were measured on whole spine radiographs. Body mass index (BMI), appendicular and trunk relative SMM index, and BES were also evaluated. These measurements were compared between spinal sagittal alignment groups using the Mann–Whitney U test. Finally, the factors contributing to abnormal alignment were analyzed using multiple logistic regression analysis. Results: BES was significantly lower in all abnormal sagittal alignment groups, as defined by PI-LL (≥ 10°), SVA (≥4 cm), and PT (≥20°) (all P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, BES was a contributing factor for abnormal PI-LL (P < 0.001), SVA (P = 0.001), and PT (P < 0.001). Conversely, a decrease in appendicular and trunk relative SMM index did not statistically affect abnormal spinal sagittal alignment. Conclusions BES was associated with changes in spinal sagittal alignment; however, SMM, which is often used for diagnosing sarcopenia, did not affect spinal sagittal alignment.

OBJECTIVES: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by chronic inflammation of the synovium, progressive erosion of the articular cartilage, and joint destruction. RA also causes secondary osteoporosis and muscle wasting. We investigated the effects of ibandronate (IBN), a bisphosphonate; eldecalcitol (ELD), an active vitamin D3 derivative; and combination treatment with both agents on secondary osteoporosis and muscle wasting using adjuvant-induced arthritis rats. METHODS: Arthritis was induced in 8-week-old male Lewis rats. Rats were randomized into 4 treatment groups and an untreated normal control group: IBN (subcutaneously, once every 2 weeks, 10 µg/kg), ELD (orally, once daily, 30 ng/kg/day), IBN + ELD, vehicle, and control. Paw thickness measurements were performed for evaluation of arthritis. The femur was scanned using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Cross-sectional areas of left tibialis and anterior muscle fibers and the expression of MuRF1, atrogin-1, MyoD, and myogenin in the gastrocnemius muscle were measured to evaluate muscle wasting. RESULTS: IBN and/or ELD increased bone mineral density (BMD) in the femur. In addition, there was an additive effect of combination treatment compared with single treatments for BMD. However, IBN and/or ELD did not inhibit muscle wasting in adjuvant-induced arthritis rats. CONCLUSIONS: Combination treatment with IBN and ELD may be effective for secondary osteoporosis associated with RA. Other treatments are necessary for muscle wasting associated with RA. Studies in humans are needed to confirm these findings.
Absorptiometry, Photon ; Animals ; Arthritis ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid ; Bone Density ; Cartilage, Articular ; Cholecalciferol ; Femur ; Humans ; Inflammation ; Joints ; Male ; Muscle, Skeletal ; Myogenin ; Osteoporosis ; Rats ; Synovial Membrane ; Vitamin D

Objectives: Progressive and generalized loss of skeletal muscle mass (SMM) and strength are characteristics of sarcopenia. However, the impact of appendicular and trunk SMM and back extensor strength (BES) on spinal sagittal alignment remains unclear. Herein, we investigate the relationship between these factors and spinal sagittal alignment. Methods: In total, 202 women without vertebral fractures (median age, 66.9 years; interquartile range, 61.4–71.9 years) were analyzed at an orthopedic outpatient clinic. Pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and pelvic tilt (PT) were measured on whole spine radiographs. Body mass index (BMI), appendicular and trunk relative SMM index, and BES were also evaluated. These measurements were compared between spinal sagittal alignment groups using the Mann–Whitney U test. Finally, the factors contributing to abnormal alignment were analyzed using multiple logistic regression analysis. Results: BES was significantly lower in all abnormal sagittal alignment groups, as defined by PI-LL (≥ 10°), SVA (≥4 cm), and PT (≥20°) (all P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, BES was a contributing factor for abnormal PI-LL (P < 0.001), SVA (P = 0.001), and PT (P < 0.001). Conversely, a decrease in appendicular and trunk relative SMM index did not statistically affect abnormal spinal sagittal alignment. Conclusions BES was associated with changes in spinal sagittal alignment; however, SMM, which is often used for diagnosing sarcopenia, did not affect spinal sagittal alignment.