Aphasia is one of the major complications after stroke, which needs an effective assessment. Event-related potential (ERP) has been widely researched in neurology, the endogenous components, such as P300, N400, mismatch negativity (MMN), contingent nega-tive variation (CNV) have been widely used in diagnosis and evaluation of the impairment of brain function, including the language func-tion. This paper discussed the application of different endogenous components of ERP in aphasia after stroke, especially the comparative analysis of N400 and P300.

Objective:To investigate the ultrasound image and pathological features of invasive fibromatosis, and to provide a basis for the diagnosis of invasive fibromatosis.Methods:The clinicopathological data of 22 patients pathologically diagnosed with invasive fibromatosis from January 2016 to March 2019 in Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical, ultrasound and pathological data were also summarized.Results:Ultrasound images of invasive fibromatosis showed irregular morphology, unclear boundaries, uneven echo, spot-like or strip-shaped blood flow signals. The coincidence rate of ultrasound diagnosis was 59.1% (13/22), 3 cases were misdiagnosed as fibrous, fat and other sarcomas, 4 cases were misdiagnosed as nerve-derived tumors, 1 case was misdiagnosed as nodular fasciitis, and 1 case was misdiagnosed as gastrointestinal stromal tumor. The pathological characteristics of invasive fibromatosis were more typical, and the positive expression rate of vimentin and β-catenin in immunohistochemistry was 100.0% (22/22); the coincidence rate of preoperative pathological diagnosis of puncture was 78.6% (11/14), 1 case was misdiagnosed as nerve fiber tumor, 1 case was misdiagnosed as low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma, and 1 case was misdiagnosed as nodular fasciitis.Conclusion:Invasive fibromatosis has a certain specificity in ultrasound and pathological diagnosis, which can be diagnosed and differentially diagnosed according to the ultrasound image and pathological characteristics.

Objective To investigate the effects of anti?PD?L1 monoclonal antibody and EGFR?TKI on expression of soluble PD?L1 and function of T lymphocytes in EGFR?mutated lung cancer cells. Methods Flow cytometry was used to analyze the expression of membrane PD?LI. ELISA was performed to detect the level of sPD?L1 in the supernatant of cultured EGFR?mutated and wild type lung cancer cells before and after erlotinib treatment. After treated with anti?PD?L1 monoclonal antibody alone and in combination with erlotinib, the proliferation of T lymphocytes in co?culture system was measured using Cell Counting Kit?8 ( CCK?8) assay. The expression levels of PD?LI and IFN?γin tumor cells and T lymphocytes treated with erlotinib in co?culture system were analyzed by flow cytometry and ELISA, respectively. Results PD?L1 was highly expressed in EGFR?mutated lung cancer PC9 cells (78.7±3.1)% and HCC827 cells (82. 7±2.6)%.After treated with erlotinib, the expression rates of membrane PD?L1 in PC9 and HCC827 cells were down?regulated (64.7%±3.1% and 73.0%±2.6%, respectively),significantly lower than that in the two cell lines without erlotinib treatment ( P<0.05) , and the expression levels of sPD?L1 in the supernatant of PC9 and HCC827 cells were also down?regulated ( 0. 680 ± 0. 120) ng/ml and ( 0. 903 ± 0. 047) ng/ml, respectively, significantly lower than that in the two cell lines without erlotinib treatment ( P<0. 01 ) . However, no significant changes of membrane PD?L1 and sPD?L1 expression were found in EGFR wild type lung cancer cells ( H1299 and A549) before and after erlotinib treatment. In the co?culture system composed of T cells and EGFR?mutated lung cancer cells, treatment with erlotinib alone promoted the proliferation of T lymphocytes (P<0.05), and combined treatment of anti?PD?L1 monoclonal antibody with erlotinib had a stronger effect ( P<0.05) . In the co?culture system composed of T cells and EGFR wild type cell lines, the proliferation of T cells was not changed after using erlotinib alone or combination of erlotinib and anti?PD?L1 monoclonal antibody ( P>0.05) . Before and after treatment with erlotinib, the secretion levels of IFN?γwere (856.0± 70. 3) pg/ml and ( 1 697. 3 ± 161. 0) pg/ml, respectively, showing a significant difference ( P<0.001). The expression rates of membrane PD?L1 were (76.2±0.5)% and (50.9±0.9)%, respectively, also showing a significant difference ( P<0.001) . However, no significant changes in the expression of IFN?γ and membrane PD?L1 were found in the co?culture system composed of T cells and A549 cells. Conclusions Anti?PD?L1 monoclonal antibody combined with EGFR?TKI can effectively promote the proliferation and secretion function of T lymphocytes in the microenvironment of EGFR?mutated lung cancer cells.

Objective To investigate the effects of anti?PD?L1 monoclonal antibody and EGFR?TKI on expression of soluble PD?L1 and function of T lymphocytes in EGFR?mutated lung cancer cells. Methods Flow cytometry was used to analyze the expression of membrane PD?LI. ELISA was performed to detect the level of sPD?L1 in the supernatant of cultured EGFR?mutated and wild type lung cancer cells before and after erlotinib treatment. After treated with anti?PD?L1 monoclonal antibody alone and in combination with erlotinib, the proliferation of T lymphocytes in co?culture system was measured using Cell Counting Kit?8 ( CCK?8) assay. The expression levels of PD?LI and IFN?γin tumor cells and T lymphocytes treated with erlotinib in co?culture system were analyzed by flow cytometry and ELISA, respectively. Results PD?L1 was highly expressed in EGFR?mutated lung cancer PC9 cells (78.7±3.1)% and HCC827 cells (82. 7±2.6)%.After treated with erlotinib, the expression rates of membrane PD?L1 in PC9 and HCC827 cells were down?regulated (64.7%±3.1% and 73.0%±2.6%, respectively),significantly lower than that in the two cell lines without erlotinib treatment ( P<0.05) , and the expression levels of sPD?L1 in the supernatant of PC9 and HCC827 cells were also down?regulated ( 0. 680 ± 0. 120) ng/ml and ( 0. 903 ± 0. 047) ng/ml, respectively, significantly lower than that in the two cell lines without erlotinib treatment ( P<0. 01 ) . However, no significant changes of membrane PD?L1 and sPD?L1 expression were found in EGFR wild type lung cancer cells ( H1299 and A549) before and after erlotinib treatment. In the co?culture system composed of T cells and EGFR?mutated lung cancer cells, treatment with erlotinib alone promoted the proliferation of T lymphocytes (P<0.05), and combined treatment of anti?PD?L1 monoclonal antibody with erlotinib had a stronger effect ( P<0.05) . In the co?culture system composed of T cells and EGFR wild type cell lines, the proliferation of T cells was not changed after using erlotinib alone or combination of erlotinib and anti?PD?L1 monoclonal antibody ( P>0.05) . Before and after treatment with erlotinib, the secretion levels of IFN?γwere (856.0± 70. 3) pg/ml and ( 1 697. 3 ± 161. 0) pg/ml, respectively, showing a significant difference ( P<0.001). The expression rates of membrane PD?L1 were (76.2±0.5)% and (50.9±0.9)%, respectively, also showing a significant difference ( P<0.001) . However, no significant changes in the expression of IFN?γ and membrane PD?L1 were found in the co?culture system composed of T cells and A549 cells. Conclusions Anti?PD?L1 monoclonal antibody combined with EGFR?TKI can effectively promote the proliferation and secretion function of T lymphocytes in the microenvironment of EGFR?mutated lung cancer cells.

Current advances of immunotherapy have greatly changed the way of cancer treatment. At the same time, a great number of nanoparticle-based cancer immunotherapies (NBCIs) have also been explored to elicit potent immune responses against tumors. However, few NBCIs are nearly in the clinical trial which is mainly ascribed to a lack understanding of