Nanometer material have been widely used in a number of fields because of their diversified physical and chemical effects.Owing to their good biocompatibility,well targeting property and high bioavailability,they are considered as a good support for vaccine adjuvant.In short,it has a targeting function to specific parts,can improve the immunogenicity of new vaccine,avoid first-pass metabolism in the liver and then has less side effect.With these advantages,it has shown a proved potential application for disease control and treatment.So some unique properties of nano-materials are reviewed,with a look forward to the future of their application technology in the areas of and medicine.

Objective:To investigate the effect of dexmedetomidine(DEX)on the polarization of alveolar macrophages in-duced by lipopolysaccharide(LPS)and to explore the related mechanisms.Methods:Rat alveolar macrophages NR8383 were cul-tured in vitro.Experiment one was divided into control group,model group(1 μg/ml LPS),DEX low,medium and high dose groups(1,5,10 mg/kg DEX+10 mg/kg LPS).Experiment two was divided into DEX high dose group(10 mg/kg)and DEX high dose+Colive-lin(JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway activator)group(10 mg/kg DEX+0.5 μmol/L Colivelin).The morphological changes of rat alveo-lar macrophages NR8383 were observed by inverted microscope;RT-PCR method was used to detect the expression levels of iNOS and Arg1 mRNA in NR8383 cells,and flow cytometry was used to detect the expression levels of CD86 and CD163 proteins in NR8383 cells;Western blot was used to detect the expression levels of surface marker proteins TNF-α,iNOS,SOCS,Arg1,TGF-β and JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway related proteins in NR8383 cells.Results:Compared with control group,there were a lot of cell debris in the intercellular space of NR8383 in the model group,the proportions of iNOS mRNA,CD86 positive cells,and the expression levels of TNF-α,p-JAK2/JAK2,p-STAT3/STAT3 were significantly increased,the proportions of Arg1 mRNA,CD163 positive cells,and the expression levels of SOCS and TGF-β were significantly reduced(P<0.05);compared with the model group,the NR8383 intercellular cell debris in the DEX low,medium,and high dose groups were decreased,the proportions of iNOS mRNA,CD86 positive cells,and the expression levels of TNF-α,p-JAK2/JAK2,p-STAT3/STAT3 were significantly reduced,the proportions of Arg1 mRNA,CD163 positive cells,and the expression levels of SOCS and TGF-β were significantly increased(P<0.05).The reactivation of the JAK2/STAT3 signal pathway by Colivelin could weaken the role of DEX in LPS induced NR8383 cell polarization.Conclusion:DEX can inhibit the M1 polarization of NR8383 cells induced by LPS,which may be achieved by inhibiting the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway.

OBJECTIVES: There are almost one million families who lost their only child in China, and 65.6% of them had severe and long lasting depression and needed timely psycho-intervention. This study aims to explore the relationship among resilience and its influential factors, and to compare their effect on depression. METHODS: A total of 212 only-child loss person in 9 administrative regions in Changsha were assessed by using Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, Zung Self-rating Depression Scale, Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire, Simplified Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, Social Support Rating Scale, and General Self-efficacy Scale. A hypothetical model was tested based on Kumpfer resilience framework and stress-coping theory. RESULTS: The influential factors of resilience were: positive coping (the total effect value was 0.480), support utilization (the total effect value was 0.359), neuroticism (the total effect value was -0.326), negative coping (the total effect value was 0.279), extraversion (the total effect value was 0.219), and objective support (the total effect value was 0.077). The process of individual-environment interaction showed a greater impact on resilience, which had a direct effect on depression (the total effect value was -0.344, 67.1%), and also indirect effect through self-efficacy (the total effect value was -0.169). The total effect of resilience accounted for 20.1% of the total effect of all variables. CONCLUSIONS Resilience mainly impacts depression directly, and can negatively predict depression in only-child loss parents. Resilience, located before self-efficacy, is a significant stress mediating variables. Personality traits and support utilization indirectly impact resilience via negative and positive coping. The key to promote the reorganization of resilience is the process of individual-environmental interaction, involving support utilization, positive coping, and some sorts of negative coping strategies, which plays an important role in developing a resilience intervention program and can improve the depression of the only-child loss person.
Adaptation, Psychological ; Child ; China/epidemiology* ; Extraversion, Psychological ; Humans ; Only Child ; Surveys and Questionnaires

Standardized reporting is a crucial factor affecting the use of patient guidelines （PGs）， particularly in the reporting and presentation of recommendations. This paper introduced the current status of PG reporting， including the research on PG content and presentation formats， and provided comprehensive recommendations for PG reporting from aspects such as overall framework， recommendations， presentation format， and readability. First， the presentation of PG recommendations should include clearly defined clinical questions， recommendations and their rationale， and guidance on how patients should implement the interventions； for specific content in the PG， such as level of evidence， level of recommendation， it is recommended to explain in text the reasons for giving different levels of recommendation， i.e.， to present the logic behind giving the level of recommendation to the patient； additional information needed in the recommendation framework should be supplemented by tracing references or authoritative textbooks and literature that support the recommendations. Subsequently， the PG text should be written based on the Reporting Checklist for Public Versions of Guidelines （RIGHT-PVG） reporting framework. Finally， to enhance readability and comprehension， it is recommended to refer to the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool （PEMAT） for translating PG content. To enhance the readability of PGs， it is suggested to present the PG content in a persona-lized and layered manner.

Since the concept of patient versions of guidelines （PVGs） was introduced into China， several PVGs have been published in China， but we found that there is a big difference between the concept of PVG at home and abroad， and the reason for this difference has not been reasonably explained， which has led to ambiguity and even misapplication of the PVG concept by guideline developers. By analyzing the background and purpose of PVGs， and the understanding of the PVG concept by domestic scholars， we proposed the term patient guidelines （PGs）. This refers to guidelines developed under the principles of evidence-based medicine， centered on health issues that concern patients， and based on the best available evidence， intended for patient use. Except for the general attribute of providing information or education， which is typical of common health education materials， PGs also provide recommendations and assist in decision-making， so PGs include both the patient versions of guidelines （PVG） as defined by the Guidelines International Network （GIN） and "patient-directed guidelines"， i.e. clinical practice guidelines resulting from the adaptation or reformulation of recommendations through clinical practice guidelines.

At present， the process and methodology of patient guidelines （PGs） development varies greatly and lacks systematic and standardised guidance. In addition to the interviews with PG developers， we have sorted out the relevant methodology for the adaptation and development of existing clinical practice guideline recommendations and facilitated expert deliberations to achieve a consensus， so as to finally put forward a proposal for guidance on the process and methodology for the development of PGs. The development of PGs can be divided into the preparation stage， the construction stage， and the completion stage in general， but the specific steps vary according to the different modes of development of PGs. The development process of Model 1 is basically the same as the patient version of the guideline development process provided by the International Guidelines Network， i.e.， team formation， screening of recommendations， guideline drafing， user testing and feedback， approval and dissemination. The developer should also first determine the need for and scope of translating the clinical practice guideline into a patient version during the preparation phase. Model 2 adds user experience and feedback to the conventional clinical practice guideline development process （forming a team， determining the scope of the PG， searching， evaluating and integrating evidence， forming recommendations， writing the guideline， and expert review）. Based on the different models， we sort out the process and methods of PG development and introduce the specific methods of PG development， including how to identify the clinical problem and how to form recommendations based on the existing clinical practice guidelines， with a view to providing reference for guideline developers and related researchers.