1.The incidence and clinical characteristics of impulse control disorders in patients with prolactinoma receiving dopamine agonist
Yuetian BAI ; Bin LU ; Liang SU ; Hongying YE ; Lijin JI
Chinese Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism 2022;38(11):970-975
Objective:To understand the incidence and clinical characteristics of dopamine agonist(DA) therapy-related impulse control disorders(ICDs) in prolactinoma patients.Methods:Outpatients diagnosed with prolactinoma from the Department of Endocrinology in Huashan Hospital from December 2019 to June 2020 were consecutively included and clinical data were collected. Impulse control disorders were screened with Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson′s Disease(QUIP). Barratt Impulsiveness Scale 11(BIS-11) was used to evaluate personality construct of impulsiveness from three sub-factors . Health related quality of life was evaluated by the MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey(SF-36).Results:Among the 111 cases included, 40 were male and 53 were female, with an average age of(34.74±9.05) years and an average disease duration of(66.69±50.70) months. The initial prolactin level was 147.25(89.97, 470) ng/mL and the percentage of macroadenoma was 46.8%. Ninety cases received DA while 21 cases didn′t. According to the QUIP, any ICD was screened positive in 22 cases(24.7%) in the DA group and 3 cases(14.3%) in the untreated group. The attention impulsiveness scores of BIS-11 in the DA group were higher than the untreated group(23.32±3.67 vs 21.71±2.55, P=0.022). Among the ICDs positive cases in the DA group, the most common disorders were pathological gambling(40.6%) and hypersexuality(40.6%). Compared with the negative group, the non-planning impulsiveness scores of BIS-11 in the positive group were higher, while the scores of social function(69.32±24.62 vs 83.08±17.11, P=0.021), role emotional(50.00±45.72 vs 71.10±40.68, P=0.043) and mental health(55.27±22.75 vs 64.59±17.53, P=0.048) in SF-36 scale were lower in the positive group. Besides, the percentage of male(68.2% vs 38.2%, P=0.014) and initial prolactin level[470.00(130.00, 3 770.00) vs 140.29(79.50, 465.59) ng/mL, P=0.028] in the positive group were higher. Male was an independent risk factor of the presence of ICDs( OR=3.46, 95% CI 1.24-9.61, P=0.017). No significant difference was found in the type of drugs, duration, maximal or cumulative dose of treatment with DA between the two groups. Conclusion:Impulse control disorders may occur in prolactinoma patients receiving DA treatment and affect the quality of life. Endocrinologists should screen impulse control disorders in this patient set.
2.The prevalence and clinical characteristics of macroprolactinemia: A single center survey
Lijin JI ; Yuetian BAI ; Huating ZHANG ; Yao HU ; Hongying YE ; Yiming LI ; Bin LU
Chinese Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism 2021;37(11):991-995
Objective:To describe the prevalence and clinical characteristics of macroprolactinemia in hyperprolactinemia patients.Methods:Consecutive 111 outpatients diagnosed with hyperprolactinemia were included in this study. Macroprolactin was routinely screened using the polyethylene glycol(PEG) precipitation method. Recovery of monomeric prolactin less than 40% was defined as macroprolactinemia. Clinical characteristics were analyzed in this study.Results:Among the 111 cases included, 99 were female and 12 were male, with an average age of(32.2±7.9) years. There were 32 cases(28.8%) of macroprolactinemia and 28 of them with normal monomeric prolactin levels(simple macroprolactinemia). prolactin levels before precipitation in simple macroprolactinemia were significantly lower than those with true hyperprolactinemia[(49.81±23.58 vs 83.56±65.82) ng/mL, P<0.05]. No amenorrhea and infertility were observed in patients with simple macroprolactinemia. The clinical manifestations of prolonged menstruation, oligomenorrhea and galactorrhea in female patients accounted for 25.9%, 37.0%, and 7.4%, respectively. Imaging data were obtained in 92 cases. The prevalence of pituitary adenomas in simple macroprolactinemia and true hyperprolactinemia was 42.9% and 66.0%, respectively. Fifteen(46.8%) of the macroprolactinemia cases were receiving or had received bromocriptine treatment, and 66.7% of them failed to achieve normal prolactin levels during therapy. Conclusion:Macroprolactinemia might be common in clinical practice. Macroprolactin should be screened in hyperprolactinemia patients lack of amenorrhea and infertility, and with poor response to dopamine agonist therapy.