Objective:To investigate the safety and efficacy of submucosal tunnel docking endoscopic resection (SDER) for the treatment of giant submucosal tumors in the cardia.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on data of patients with giant submucosal tumors in the cardia who were treated with SDER at the endoscopy center of Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University and Xuhui District Central Hospital from January 2021 to January 2022. The surgical records, postoperative pathology, complications, hospitalization, and follow-up were analyzed.Results:A total of 6 patients were included. The mean long diameter of the lesions was 4.0 cm, all of which were located in the cardia. All patients successfully underwent SDER treatment with a surgical time of 23-42 min. Postoperative pathology revealed that 4 cases were leiomyomas and 2 cases were gastrointestinal stromal tumors. All lesions were completely resected. The postoperative hospital stay was 3-5 d, and no serious complications occurred after surgery. All patients recovered on follow-up gastroscopy at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.Conclusion:The preliminary conclusion is that SDER for the treatment of giant submucosal tumors in the cardia is safe, effective.

Background::Digestive system cancers constitute a significant number of cancer cases, but their burden is not uniform. As Global Cancer Observatory (GLOBOCAN) 2022 has recently updated its estimates of cancer burden, we aimed to investigate the burden of six major digestive system cancers both worldwide and in China, along with geographical and temporal variations in cancer-specific incidence and mortality.Methods::We extracted data on primary cancers of the esophagus, stomach, colorectum, liver, pancreas, and gallbladder from the GLOBOCAN database for 2022. Age-standardized incidence and mortality rates were calculated and stratified by sex, country, region, and human development index (HDI). We used the 2022 revision of the World Population Prospects (United Nations) to obtain demographic data for various age groups in China from 1988 to 2012 and used the joinpoint model and the average annual percentage change (AAPC) to analyze cancer incidence trends in China.Results::In 2022, the estimated global incidence of digestive system cancers reached 4,905,882, with an estimated 3,324,774 cancer-related deaths. Colorectal cancer was most prevalent in terms of incidence and mortality. There was a significant correlation between the burden of gastrointestinal cancers and country HDI. From 1988 to 2012, the incidence of esophageal, gastric, and liver cancers declined in China, whereas colorectal and pancreatic cancer incidences continued to increase. By 2050, colorectal and liver cancers are projected to remain the leading cancer types in China in terms of incidence and mortality, respectively.Conclusions::Digestive system cancers remain a significant public health challenge globally and in China. Although progress has been made in the prevention and control of some cancers, the burden of digestive system cancers persists. The implementation of tertiary prevention strategies must be intensified to reduce the incidence and mortality of digestive system cancers, mitigating their impact on public health.

Humans ; Colonoscopy ; Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology*

BACKGROUND: Early fluid resuscitation is one of the fundamental treatments for acute pancreatitis (AP), but there is no consensus on the optimal fluid rate. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of aggressive vs. controlled fluid resuscitation (CFR) in AP. METHODS: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched up to September 30, 2022, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing aggressive with controlled rates of early fluid resuscitation in AP patients without organ failure on admission. The following keywords were used in the search strategy: "pancreatitis," "fluid therapy,""fluid resuscitation,"and "randomized controlled trial." There was no language restriction. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was used to assess the certainty of evidence. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used to control the risk of random errors and assess the conclusions. RESULTS: A total of five RCTs, involving 481 participants, were included in this study. For primary outcomes, there was no significant difference in the development of severe AP (relative risk [RR]: 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95-3.68; P = 0.07; n = 437; moderate quality of evidence) or hypovolemia (RR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.32-2.97; P = 0.97; n = 437; moderate quality of evidence) between the aggressive and CFR groups. A significantly higher risk of fluid overload (RR: 3.25, 95% CI: 1.53-6.93; P <0.01; n = 249; low quality of evidence) was observed in the aggressive fluid resuscitation (AFR) group than the controlled group. Additionally, the risk of intensive care unit admission ( P = 0.02) and the length of hospital stay ( P <0.01) as partial secondary outcomes were higher in the AFR group. TSA suggested that more studies were required to draw precise conclusions. CONCLUSION: For AP patients without organ failure on admission, CFR may be superior to AFR with respect to both efficacy and safety outcomes. REGISTRATION PROSPERO; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ ; CRD 42022363945.
Humans ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Fluid Therapy ; Hypovolemia ; Pancreatitis/therapy*