1.Research progress on the distribution patterns and surgical dissection of central lymph nodes in left-sided colon cancer
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2024;27(9):914-918
Lymphatic metastasis is one of the main pathways of colorectal cancer spread and also a crucial factor in patient long-term prognosis. Lymph node dissection in the possible tumor drainage area, particularly the central group of lymph nodes at the root of the tumor-associated supplying artery, is a key and challenging aspect of surgical techniques. Currently, the patterns of lymphatic drainage and the distribution of central lymph nodes in left-sided colon cancer are not well illustrated, and there is no consensus on the necessity and extent of central lymph node dissection. This has led to significant variability in the extent of lymph node dissection among different surgeons in clinical practice, a lack of quality control standards for surgical procedures, and impacts on postoperative treatment strategy and long-term outcomes. Moreover, current research on lymphatic drainage and metastasis is primarily based on traditional anatomy, whereas individualized, precise approaches to lymph node dissection have not been realized. The application of preoperative and intraoperative lymph node imaging techniques based on functional anatomy in colorectal cancer patients is still under exploration.
2.Research progress on the distribution patterns and surgical dissection of central lymph nodes in left-sided colon cancer
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2024;27(9):914-918
Lymphatic metastasis is one of the main pathways of colorectal cancer spread and also a crucial factor in patient long-term prognosis. Lymph node dissection in the possible tumor drainage area, particularly the central group of lymph nodes at the root of the tumor-associated supplying artery, is a key and challenging aspect of surgical techniques. Currently, the patterns of lymphatic drainage and the distribution of central lymph nodes in left-sided colon cancer are not well illustrated, and there is no consensus on the necessity and extent of central lymph node dissection. This has led to significant variability in the extent of lymph node dissection among different surgeons in clinical practice, a lack of quality control standards for surgical procedures, and impacts on postoperative treatment strategy and long-term outcomes. Moreover, current research on lymphatic drainage and metastasis is primarily based on traditional anatomy, whereas individualized, precise approaches to lymph node dissection have not been realized. The application of preoperative and intraoperative lymph node imaging techniques based on functional anatomy in colorectal cancer patients is still under exploration.
3.Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging during laparoscopic anterior resection in rectal cancer patients
Jian CAO ; Yudi BAO ; Kewei JIANG ; Xiaodong YANG ; Mujun YIN ; Bin LIANG ; Qiwei XIE ; Shan WANG ; Zhanlong SHEN ; Yingjiang YE
Chinese Journal of General Surgery 2020;35(10):764-767
Objective:To investigate the role of indocyanine green(ICG) fluorescence imaging in laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on 7 patients who had undergone laparoscopic anterior resection with the use of ICG fluorescence imaging at Peking University People′s Hospital between Oct 2018 and Mar 2019. The clinicopathological variables, surgical factors, short-term outcome and complications were analyzed.Results:The median operation time was 185 min. The median estimated blood loss was 50 ml. The median time from ICG injection to anastomotic perfusion was 45 s. One patient received extended proximal resection of bowel due to poor perfusion as suggested by ICG imaging. The median time to soft diet was 4 days, and the median hospital stay was 8 days. The median number of lymph nodes harvested was 16. There were no major complications in all these patients. No adverse events related to ICG were recorded.Conclusions:ICG fluorescence imaging was safe and effective in detecting insufficient blood supply around newly established bowel anastomsis, hence potentially reducing the anastomotic leakage rate.
4.Controversy and consideration of high and low ligation of inferior mesenteric artery in radical resection of rectal cancer
Zhanlong SHEN ; Yudi BAO ; Yingjiang YE ; Shan WANG
Chinese Journal of Surgery 2020;58(8):596-599
Radical resection is one of the most important treatment for rectal cancer, which requires not only removal of adequate bowel and mesorectum around the tumor, but also thorough lymphadenectomy. Besides, postoperative complications are surgeons′ concerns as well. According to different ways to manage inferior mesenteric artery, procedures could be divided into two groups: inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) high ligation and low ligation, which lead to various outcomes of the extent of lymph nodes dissection, survival, preservation of intestinal blood supply, incidence of anastomotic leakage, and postoperative functions including defecation function, urinary function and sexual function. Author believes that for those patients with clinical stage T1, low ligation and D2 lymph nodes dissection could be considered. However, for patients with locally advanced carcinomas (clinical stage T2+or N+), especially suspicious metastasis of lymph nodes around IMA root, high ligation and D3 lymph node dissection is suggested to ensure en bloc resection. As for those patients with high risks for compromised intestinal blood supply, preservation of left colic artery plus D3 lymph nodes dissection might be a feasible way. Intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescent imaging might play a role in quality control of lymphadenectomy.
5.Controversy and consideration of high and low ligation of inferior mesenteric artery in radical resection of rectal cancer
Zhanlong SHEN ; Yudi BAO ; Yingjiang YE ; Shan WANG
Chinese Journal of Surgery 2020;58(8):596-599
Radical resection is one of the most important treatment for rectal cancer, which requires not only removal of adequate bowel and mesorectum around the tumor, but also thorough lymphadenectomy. Besides, postoperative complications are surgeons′ concerns as well. According to different ways to manage inferior mesenteric artery, procedures could be divided into two groups: inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) high ligation and low ligation, which lead to various outcomes of the extent of lymph nodes dissection, survival, preservation of intestinal blood supply, incidence of anastomotic leakage, and postoperative functions including defecation function, urinary function and sexual function. Author believes that for those patients with clinical stage T1, low ligation and D2 lymph nodes dissection could be considered. However, for patients with locally advanced carcinomas (clinical stage T2+or N+), especially suspicious metastasis of lymph nodes around IMA root, high ligation and D3 lymph node dissection is suggested to ensure en bloc resection. As for those patients with high risks for compromised intestinal blood supply, preservation of left colic artery plus D3 lymph nodes dissection might be a feasible way. Intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescent imaging might play a role in quality control of lymphadenectomy.