Objective To investigate the effect of axial load test in Taylor spatial frame treatment of external fixation for tibia and fibula fractures.Methods A retrospective case-control study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 36 patients with open fracture of tibia and fibula admitted to Tianjin Hospital from March 2015 to June 2017.There were 22 males and 14 females,aged 21-71 years[(46.1±14.2)years].All patients received Taylor spatial frame external fixation for tibia and fibula fracture within 1 week after injury.After operation,18 patients received axial load test(experiment group),and the other 18 did not(control group).When the value of axial load test was less than 5% in experiment group,the Taylor spatial frame was removed.The control group used traditional method to remove the Taylor spatial frame.Comparisons were made between the two groups in terms of treatment duration,total cost,re-fracture after Taylor spatial frame removal and incidence of stent-tract infection.Results All patients were followed up for 3-14 months with an average of 8.6 months.Compared with control group,the treatment duration[(36.17±11 .44)weeks vs.(44.50±9.16)weeks]and total cost[(93.7±7.9)thousand yuan vs.(120.1±10.6)thousand yuan]of experiment group were significantly lower(P＜0.05).In the experiment group,there was 0 patient with re-fracture and two patients with stent-tract infection,with the complication incidence of 11%,while there were two patients with re-fracture and three patients with stent-tract infection,with the complication incidence of 28% in the control group(P＞0.05).Conclusions After Taylor spatial frame external fixation for tibia and fibula fractures,regular axial load test can safely and timely guide the removal of Taylor spatial frame.It can reduce the treatment duration and cost compared with the traditional removal method,being safe and reliable.

The consecutive data of 822 senior public officials in Chengdu undergoing health checkup from 2011 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed.Among them,56 new cases of diabetes was diagnosed with a cumulative incidence of 6.81％.Fifty six age-and sex-matched healthy subjects served as controls,the risk factors of new-onset diabetes were analyzed with multivariate logistic regression.The results showed that BMI (OR =1.82,95％ CI:1.27-2.59,P =0.00) and fasting plasma glucose (OR =13.63,95％ CI:2.71-68.43,P =0.00) were independent risk factors of new-onset diabetes in senior public officials.

Objective: To investigate whether silencing UCP2 can sensitize cervical cancer cell line Siha to radiation. Methods: Siha cells were transfected with UCP2 siRNA and then irradiated by X-ray. The radiosensitivity of Siha cells was verified by colony formation, CCK-8, apoptosis and immunofluorescence assays. The mitochondrial membrane potential and the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) were detected to further explore the related mechanism. Results: RT-PCR and Western blot assays showed that the expression of UCP2 in Siha cells was increased after irradiation and the UCP2 siRNA successfully silenced the expression of UCP in cells. According to the survival curves, the D₀, D_q, N and SF₂ were 1.54, 1.31, 2.31 Gy and 0.52 for siUCP2 group, 2.50, 3.64, 4.30 Gy and 0.83 for blank control group, and 3.34, 2.16, 1.91 Gy and 0.69, for siNC group, respectively. The radiosensitivity enhancement ratio of silent group was 0.62 and 0.46, compared with blank control group and negative control group, respectively. The proliferative activity of cells in the silent group was lower than that in the control group (t=13.2, P<0.05). Apoptosis levels in the silent group were significantly higher than those in the control group after irradiation(t=3.14, P<0.05). At 4 h after irradiation, the ROS production in the silent group was significantly higher than that in the control group (t=19.10, P<0.05). At 24 h after irradiation, the mitochondrial membrane potential of Siha cells in the silent group was significantly lower than that in the control group (t=4.18, P<0.05). Conclusions The radiosensitivity of Siha cells is enhanced after UCP2 silencing, and thus UCP2 may applicable as a new target for radiosensitization of cervical cancer cells.

Objective:To explore the dosimetric differences of different dose accumulation method for brachytherapy combined with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) of cervical cancer and establish clinical prediction models for radiation-induced late rectal injury (RLRI) after radiotherapy.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted for the clinical data of patients who received radical concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for cervical cancer in the Department of Oncology of the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College from January 1, 2020 to November 30, 2021. EBRT combined with brachytherapy was employed for the patients, and dose assessment was performed in two means: the direct accumulation using equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) and deformable image registration (DIR)-based dose accumulation of 3D planning images. The toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group were adopted as the RLRI grading criteria. The prediction models of RLRI using both dose assessment method were constructed. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated to assess the predictive accuracy of the different dose assessment method.Results:In the case of brachytherapy, the D95% and D90% EQD2 doses to high-risk clinical target volumes (HR-CTVs) were 2.18 and 2.92 Gy higher respectively and the D2 cm 3, D1 cm 3, and D0.1 cm 3 EQD2 doses to the rectal were 1.74, 2.28, and 2.26 Gy higher, respectively compared to DIR-based dose accumulation ( t = 3.82, 5.21, 4.58, 5.17, 2.05, P < 0.05). For EBRT combined with brachytherapy, the D2 cm 3, D1 cm 3, and D0.1 cm 3 EQD2 doses to the rectal were 6.22, 7.61, 9.56 Gy higher than DIR-based doses, respectively, and the dosimetric differences were statistically significant ( t = 9.40, 10.59, 7.87, P < 0.001). The joint prediction model yielded an area under the ROC curve of 0.788. The sensitivity and specificity of the optimal cut-off value were 0.850 and 0.660, respectively. Furthermore, the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit tests indicated high goodness-of-fit ( P > 0.05). The prediction model for DIR-based dose accumulation of traditional predictors yielded areas under the ROC curves for D2 cm 3 and D1 cm 3 to the rectal of 0.784 and 0.763, respectively. The sensitivities of the optimal cut-off values were 0.850 and 0.750, respectively, and the specificities were 0.679 and 0.717, respectively. Conclusions:There are dosimetric differences between the direct dose accumulation using EQD2 and DIR-based dose accumulation of 3D planning images for brachytherapy combined with EBRT. Both the joint prediction model and the DIR-based dose accumulation of D2 cm 3 and D1 cm 3 to the rectal are effective in predicting RLRI. Given the complex calculation of the joint prediction model, it is recommended that RLRI should be predicted through DIR-based dose accumulation of D2 cm 3 and D1 cm 3 to the rectal clinically.