1.Quality evaluation of Changmaile Capsules(Ⅰ)
Kuan ZHANG ; Yu-Hang OU ; Chun-Yan LUO ; Yi-Ling WENG ; Yu-He XIE ; Jin-Xian YAN
Chinese Traditional Patent Medicine 2024;46(7):2134-2139
AIM To evaluate the quality of Changmaile Capsules(Ⅰ).METHODS The analysis was performed on a 35℃ thermostatic Thermo Scientific AccucoreTM XL C18 column(4.6 mm×250 mm,4 μm),with the mobile phase comprising of methanol-acetonitrile-0.5% phosphoric acid flowing at 1 mL/min in a gradient elution manner,and the detection wavelengths were set at 230,280 nm.The contents of gastrodin,danshensu,quercetin-3-O-β-D-glucose-7-O-β-D-gentiobioside,3′-hydroxypuerarin,puerarin,3′-methoxypuerarin,puerarin apioside,daidzin,rosmarinic acid,lithospermic acid,ononin,daidzein,salvianolic acid B,calycosin,paeoniflorin and isoquercitrin were determined,after which HPLC fingerprints were established,along with the calculation of similarities.RESULTS Sixteen constituents showed good linear relationships within their own ranges(r≥0.999 0),whose average recoveries were 87.4%-103.9% with the RSDs of 0.54%-3.10% .At 230 nm,the fingerprints of ten batches of samples demonstrated similarities of 0.954-0.999,which displayed obvious differences at 280 nm.3′-Hydroxypuerarin,puerarin,3′-methoxypuerarin,puerarin apioside,daidzin and daidzein were main differential constituents,paeoniflorin and isoquercitrin exhibited stable contents in various batches of samples.CONCLUSION This simple,accurate and reliable method can be used for the quality control of Changmaile Capsules(Ⅰ).
2.Immunogenicity and safety of a recombinant fusion protein vaccine (V-01) against coronavirus disease 2019 in healthy adults: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial.
Ya-Jun SHU ; Jian-Feng HE ; Rong-Juan PEI ; Peng HE ; Zhu-Hang HUANG ; Shao-Min CHEN ; Zhi-Qiang OU ; Jing-Long DENG ; Pei-Yu ZENG ; Jian ZHOU ; Yuan-Qin MIN ; Fei DENG ; Hua PENG ; Zheng ZHANG ; Bo WANG ; Zhong-Hui XU ; Wu-Xiang GUAN ; Zhong-Yu HU ; Ji-Kai ZHANG
Chinese Medical Journal 2021;134(16):1967-1976
BACKGROUND:
Innovative coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines, with elevated global manufacturing capacity, enhanced safety and efficacy, simplified dosing regimens, and distribution that is less cold chain-dependent, are still global imperatives for tackling the ongoing pandemic. A previous phase I trial indicated that the recombinant COVID-19 vaccine (V-01), which contains a fusion protein (IFN-PADRE-RBD-Fc dimer) as its antigen, is safe and well tolerated, capable of inducing rapid and robust immune responses, and warranted further testing in additional clinical trials. Herein, we aimed to assess the immunogenicity and safety of V-01, providing rationales of appropriate dose regimen for further efficacy study.
METHODS:
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II clinical trial was initiated at the Gaozhou Municipal Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (Guangdong, China) in March 2021. Both younger (n = 440; 18-59 years of age) and older (n = 440; ≥60 years of age) adult participants in this trial were sequentially recruited into two distinct groups: two-dose regimen group in which participants were randomized either to follow a 10 or 25 μg of V-01 or placebo given intramuscularly 21 days apart (allocation ratio, 3:3:1, n = 120, 120, 40 for each regimen, respectively), or one-dose regimen groups in which participants were randomized either to receive a single injection of 50 μg of V-01 or placebo (allocation ratio, 3:1, n = 120, 40, respectively). The primary immunogenicity endpoints were the geometric mean titers of neutralizing antibodies against live severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, and specific binding antibodies to the receptor binding domain (RBD). The primary safety endpoint evaluation was the frequencies and percentages of overall adverse events (AEs) within 30 days after full immunization.
RESULTS:
V-01 provoked substantial immune responses in the two-dose group, achieving encouragingly high titers of neutralizing antibody and anti-RBD immunoglobulin, which peaked at day 35 (161.9 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 133.3-196.7] and 149.3 [95%CI: 123.9-179.9] in 10 and 25 μg V-01 group of younger adults, respectively; 111.6 [95%CI: 89.6-139.1] and 111.1 [95%CI: 89.2-138.4] in 10 and 25 μg V-01 group of older adults, respectively), and remained high at day 49 after a day-21 second dose; these levels significantly exceed those in convalescent serum from symptomatic COVID-19 patients (53.6, 95%CI: 31.3-91.7). Our preliminary data show that V-01 is safe and well tolerated, with reactogenicity predominantly being absent or mild in severity and only one vaccine-related grade 3 or worse AE being observed within 30 days. The older adult participants demonstrated a more favorable safety profile compared with those in the younger adult group: with AEs percentages of 19.2%, 25.8%, 17.5% in older adults vs. 34.2%, 23.3%, 26.7% in younger adults at the 10, 25 μg V-01 two-dose group, and 50 μg V-01 one-dose group, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS:
The vaccine candidate V-01 appears to be safe and immunogenic. The preliminary findings support the advancement of the two-dose, 10 μg V-01 regimen to a phase III trial for a large-scale population-based evaluation of safety and efficacy.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx (No. ChiCTR2100045107, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=124702).
Aged
;
Antibodies, Viral
;
COVID-19/therapy*
;
COVID-19 Vaccines
;
Double-Blind Method
;
Humans
;
Immunization, Passive
;
Recombinant Fusion Proteins
;
SARS-CoV-2