1.Spinal Meningeal Cysts in Low Back Patients.
Kyu Sung LEE ; Jun Chul CHOI ; Yong Jung KIM ; Uck JIN ; Yu Jin JUNG
The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association 1998;33(6):1599-1606
The authors reviewed the clinical findings and treatment results of 12 cases of spinal meningeal cysts which were detected in MRI of low back patients. In these lesions, large cysts without CSF communication can compressed the nerve roots within spinal canal and it is difficult to confirm the cause of symptom whether it is originated from cysts or from associated spinal disorders. The terms and classifications of spinal meningeal cysts were very confusing. Among 12 cases, we excised 3 cases of large cysts with gluteal and perianal pains that were caused by compressed sacral nerve roots. All three cases were type 2 cyst (classified by Nabors) and located in sacral canal. In one case associated with isthmic spondylolisthesis, posterolateral fusion and pedicle screw fixations were combined with cyst excision. In other two cases, there were not any spinal pathologic findings that compressed sacral nerve roots except mild degenerative changes and intervertebral disc herniation in lower lumbar and sacral levels All 3 excised cases showed good prognosis in more than one year follow up. The other cases were treated conservatively for the associated spinal disorders.
Classification
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Intervertebral Disc
;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
;
Prognosis
;
Radiculopathy
;
Spinal Canal
;
Spondylolisthesis
2.Response of children with Turner syndrome with different types of karyotype abnormalities to growth hormone treatment
Jung Eun CHOI ; Mi Jung PARK ; Jeesuk YU ; Hae Soon KIM
Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism 2024;29(5):308-315
Purpose:
Short stature is the main characteristic of Turner syndrome (TS) patients and growth hormone (GH) therapy has been essential for achieving the final adult height (Ht). In the present study, the response of TS patients with different types of karyotype abnormalities to GH therapy was analyzed.
Methods:
The clinical parameters of 194 TS patients registered in the LG Growth Study were retrospectively reviewed. Data for 4 groups of subjects were obtained as follows: monosomy X (n=56); X structural abnormality (n=26); X mosaicism without structural abnormality (n=41); X mosaicism with structural abnormality (n=71). Clinical characteristics and growth response parameters were compared over 3 years of GH treatment.
Results:
The baseline Ht standard deviation score (SDS) of all patients was -2.85±0.86. The baseline Ht SDS, body mass index SDS, and chronological age (years)-bone age (years) were significantly different based on chromosomal abnormalities. The growth velocity (GV; cm/yr) in the first year was the highest and significantly different among the groups. The GV in the second year also showed an increase in the X mosaicism without structural abnormality group compared with the monosomy X group. The change in Ht SDS (ΔHt SDS) over 3 years was not statistically different between karyotypes.
Conclusion
The response to 3 years of GH therapy did not differ based on the karyotype of TS patients although the initial Ht SDS was the lowest in the monosomy X group.
3.Response of children with Turner syndrome with different types of karyotype abnormalities to growth hormone treatment
Jung Eun CHOI ; Mi Jung PARK ; Jeesuk YU ; Hae Soon KIM
Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism 2024;29(5):308-315
Purpose:
Short stature is the main characteristic of Turner syndrome (TS) patients and growth hormone (GH) therapy has been essential for achieving the final adult height (Ht). In the present study, the response of TS patients with different types of karyotype abnormalities to GH therapy was analyzed.
Methods:
The clinical parameters of 194 TS patients registered in the LG Growth Study were retrospectively reviewed. Data for 4 groups of subjects were obtained as follows: monosomy X (n=56); X structural abnormality (n=26); X mosaicism without structural abnormality (n=41); X mosaicism with structural abnormality (n=71). Clinical characteristics and growth response parameters were compared over 3 years of GH treatment.
Results:
The baseline Ht standard deviation score (SDS) of all patients was -2.85±0.86. The baseline Ht SDS, body mass index SDS, and chronological age (years)-bone age (years) were significantly different based on chromosomal abnormalities. The growth velocity (GV; cm/yr) in the first year was the highest and significantly different among the groups. The GV in the second year also showed an increase in the X mosaicism without structural abnormality group compared with the monosomy X group. The change in Ht SDS (ΔHt SDS) over 3 years was not statistically different between karyotypes.
Conclusion
The response to 3 years of GH therapy did not differ based on the karyotype of TS patients although the initial Ht SDS was the lowest in the monosomy X group.
4.Response of children with Turner syndrome with different types of karyotype abnormalities to growth hormone treatment
Jung Eun CHOI ; Mi Jung PARK ; Jeesuk YU ; Hae Soon KIM
Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism 2024;29(5):308-315
Purpose:
Short stature is the main characteristic of Turner syndrome (TS) patients and growth hormone (GH) therapy has been essential for achieving the final adult height (Ht). In the present study, the response of TS patients with different types of karyotype abnormalities to GH therapy was analyzed.
Methods:
The clinical parameters of 194 TS patients registered in the LG Growth Study were retrospectively reviewed. Data for 4 groups of subjects were obtained as follows: monosomy X (n=56); X structural abnormality (n=26); X mosaicism without structural abnormality (n=41); X mosaicism with structural abnormality (n=71). Clinical characteristics and growth response parameters were compared over 3 years of GH treatment.
Results:
The baseline Ht standard deviation score (SDS) of all patients was -2.85±0.86. The baseline Ht SDS, body mass index SDS, and chronological age (years)-bone age (years) were significantly different based on chromosomal abnormalities. The growth velocity (GV; cm/yr) in the first year was the highest and significantly different among the groups. The GV in the second year also showed an increase in the X mosaicism without structural abnormality group compared with the monosomy X group. The change in Ht SDS (ΔHt SDS) over 3 years was not statistically different between karyotypes.
Conclusion
The response to 3 years of GH therapy did not differ based on the karyotype of TS patients although the initial Ht SDS was the lowest in the monosomy X group.
5.Response of children with Turner syndrome with different types of karyotype abnormalities to growth hormone treatment
Jung Eun CHOI ; Mi Jung PARK ; Jeesuk YU ; Hae Soon KIM
Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism 2024;29(5):308-315
Purpose:
Short stature is the main characteristic of Turner syndrome (TS) patients and growth hormone (GH) therapy has been essential for achieving the final adult height (Ht). In the present study, the response of TS patients with different types of karyotype abnormalities to GH therapy was analyzed.
Methods:
The clinical parameters of 194 TS patients registered in the LG Growth Study were retrospectively reviewed. Data for 4 groups of subjects were obtained as follows: monosomy X (n=56); X structural abnormality (n=26); X mosaicism without structural abnormality (n=41); X mosaicism with structural abnormality (n=71). Clinical characteristics and growth response parameters were compared over 3 years of GH treatment.
Results:
The baseline Ht standard deviation score (SDS) of all patients was -2.85±0.86. The baseline Ht SDS, body mass index SDS, and chronological age (years)-bone age (years) were significantly different based on chromosomal abnormalities. The growth velocity (GV; cm/yr) in the first year was the highest and significantly different among the groups. The GV in the second year also showed an increase in the X mosaicism without structural abnormality group compared with the monosomy X group. The change in Ht SDS (ΔHt SDS) over 3 years was not statistically different between karyotypes.
Conclusion
The response to 3 years of GH therapy did not differ based on the karyotype of TS patients although the initial Ht SDS was the lowest in the monosomy X group.
6.Socioeconomic inequalities in health risk factors in Korea.
Yu Mi KIM ; Kyunghee JUNG-CHOI
Journal of the Korean Medical Association 2013;56(3):175-183
Tackling socioeconomic inequalities in health risk factors is an important pathway for alleviating health inequalities. The aim of this study was to analyze the current state of inequality in health risk factors by socioeconomic status in Korea through a literature review of recently published studies and description of secondary data from the Korea National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (KNHANES). We evaluated the extent and trends of socioeconomic inequalities in health behavior (smoking, high-risk alcohol drinking, moderate exercise, and nutritional deficiency) and clinical risk factors (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, and obesity) with 1998 to 2010 KNHANES data based on socio-economic status. Furthermore, we summarized the impact of several distal health determinants like income, education and occupation, and childhood period on health inequalities in Korea. The results showed that a wide range of health risk factors including more distal causes were socio-economically patterned to varying degrees. In order to reduce health inequalities by socioeconomic status, more comprehensive monitoring and measures, and well-designed studies are required for promoting the understanding of the causal pathway and developing interventional strategies.
Alcohol Drinking
;
Diabetes Mellitus
;
Health Behavior
;
Hypercholesterolemia
;
Korea
;
Occupations
;
Risk Factors
;
Social Class
;
Socioeconomic Factors
7.Socioeconomic inequalities in health status in Korea.
Kyunghee JUNG-CHOI ; Yu Mi KIM
Journal of the Korean Medical Association 2013;56(3):167-174
Both social interest in and studies of socioeconomic inequalities in health have increased in recent years. This article presents the current state of socioeconomic inequalities in health status in Korea, based on recent research. Socioeconomic inequalities in health status have been consistently observed in Korea as well as abroad. In both men and women, from birth-sometimes evenfrom before birth-to death, inverse relationships between socioeconomic position and most indicators of healthexist. For some health indicators, such as suicide, absolute and relative inequalities have become significantly worse than in the past. Knowledge of health inequalities in small geographic areas can be useful for allocating health resources. Representative indicators of socioeconomic inequalities in health shouldundergo ongoing monitoringby the government. In addition, there is a need for research to explore the mechanisms and to evaluate the effectiveness of specific policies and intervention programs as well as to identify socioeconomic inequalities in a variety of health outcomes. Learning the status of and trends in socioeconomic inequalities in health isan essential step toward increasing awareness of these inequalities in society and promoting an integrated and systematic policy for tackling them.
Female
;
Health Resources
;
Humans
;
Korea
;
Learning
;
Male
;
Socioeconomic Factors
;
Suicide
8.Cutaneous Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor Not Associated with Neurofibromatosis.
Ha Na JUNG ; Woong Suk CHAE ; Ho Seok SUH ; Yu Sung CHOI
Korean Journal of Dermatology 2014;52(5):353-354
No abstract available.
Neurofibromatoses*
;
Peripheral Nerves*
9.Vitiligo Lesions Stopped Spreading after Oral Cyclosporine in a Vitiligo Patient Who Shows Systemic Steroid Resistance.
Woong Suk CHAE ; Danbi LEE ; Ha Na JUNG ; Ho Seok SUH ; Yu Sung CHOI
Korean Journal of Dermatology 2014;52(2):144-145
No abstract available.
Cyclosporine*
;
Humans
;
Vitiligo*
10.A Case of Benign Cephalic Histiocytosis.
Jun Young SEONG ; Woong Suk CHAE ; Ha Na JUNG ; Ho Seok SUH ; Yu Sung CHOI
Korean Journal of Dermatology 2014;52(8):587-588
No abstract available.
Histiocytosis*