This study evaluated the feasibility of implementing a value-based, community-centered primary care model in South Korea by focusing on the Anseong Health Welfare Social Cooperative (Anseong Medicoop) as a case study. Anseong Medicoop restructured its existing NaHaengSi (“time for caring for oneself”) program into a community-centered healthcare model and provides services to 1,517 participants. This healthcare model categorized participants into two groups: disease prevention and chronic disease management. Service provision encompassed five stages: registration and categorization, initial examination, comprehensive assessment and planning, service delivery, and monitoring and evaluation. By emphasizing comprehensive community-centered activities, preventive services, and appropriate medical treatments, Anseong Medicoop possesses a robust foundation for the effective implementation of this model. The high levels of satisfaction observed in service evaluations provide further evidence of its success. Anseong Medicoop’s healthcare model demonstrated the feasibility of a community-centered primary care approach in South Korea. This study highlights the potential for the successful implementation of a value-based, community-centered primary care model in South Korea if operational challenges are sufficiently addressed and a new payment system is introduced.

This study evaluated the feasibility of implementing a value-based, community-centered primary care model in South Korea by focusing on the Anseong Health Welfare Social Cooperative (Anseong Medicoop) as a case study. Anseong Medicoop restructured its existing NaHaengSi (“time for caring for oneself”) program into a community-centered healthcare model and provides services to 1,517 participants. This healthcare model categorized participants into two groups: disease prevention and chronic disease management. Service provision encompassed five stages: registration and categorization, initial examination, comprehensive assessment and planning, service delivery, and monitoring and evaluation. By emphasizing comprehensive community-centered activities, preventive services, and appropriate medical treatments, Anseong Medicoop possesses a robust foundation for the effective implementation of this model. The high levels of satisfaction observed in service evaluations provide further evidence of its success. Anseong Medicoop’s healthcare model demonstrated the feasibility of a community-centered primary care approach in South Korea. This study highlights the potential for the successful implementation of a value-based, community-centered primary care model in South Korea if operational challenges are sufficiently addressed and a new payment system is introduced.

This study evaluated the feasibility of implementing a value-based, community-centered primary care model in South Korea by focusing on the Anseong Health Welfare Social Cooperative (Anseong Medicoop) as a case study. Anseong Medicoop restructured its existing NaHaengSi (“time for caring for oneself”) program into a community-centered healthcare model and provides services to 1,517 participants. This healthcare model categorized participants into two groups: disease prevention and chronic disease management. Service provision encompassed five stages: registration and categorization, initial examination, comprehensive assessment and planning, service delivery, and monitoring and evaluation. By emphasizing comprehensive community-centered activities, preventive services, and appropriate medical treatments, Anseong Medicoop possesses a robust foundation for the effective implementation of this model. The high levels of satisfaction observed in service evaluations provide further evidence of its success. Anseong Medicoop’s healthcare model demonstrated the feasibility of a community-centered primary care approach in South Korea. This study highlights the potential for the successful implementation of a value-based, community-centered primary care model in South Korea if operational challenges are sufficiently addressed and a new payment system is introduced.

This study evaluated the feasibility of implementing a value-based, community-centered primary care model in South Korea by focusing on the Anseong Health Welfare Social Cooperative (Anseong Medicoop) as a case study. Anseong Medicoop restructured its existing NaHaengSi (“time for caring for oneself”) program into a community-centered healthcare model and provides services to 1,517 participants. This healthcare model categorized participants into two groups: disease prevention and chronic disease management. Service provision encompassed five stages: registration and categorization, initial examination, comprehensive assessment and planning, service delivery, and monitoring and evaluation. By emphasizing comprehensive community-centered activities, preventive services, and appropriate medical treatments, Anseong Medicoop possesses a robust foundation for the effective implementation of this model. The high levels of satisfaction observed in service evaluations provide further evidence of its success. Anseong Medicoop’s healthcare model demonstrated the feasibility of a community-centered primary care approach in South Korea. This study highlights the potential for the successful implementation of a value-based, community-centered primary care model in South Korea if operational challenges are sufficiently addressed and a new payment system is introduced.

Purpose: This study developed a scale of nurses' stress and examined the validity and reliability of the scale. Methods: The scale was developed according to DeVellis' scale development procedure. Based on the Nursing Work Environment Stress model and the results of focus group interviews, 43 preliminary items were generated. A survey was conducted with 208 clinical nurses to test the psychometric properties of the scale. Both exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were employed to figure out and confirm the scale's theoretical structure statistically. In addition, content, convergent, and discriminative validity were evaluated and Cronbach's ⍺ was calculated to test internal reliability. Results: The final scale consisted of 19 items and verified four-factor structures. The structure of the scale was confirmed using confirmatory factor analysis, and it showed moderate correlations with the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory and Korean Nurses Occupational Stress Scale. Cronbach's ⍺ was .87. Conclusion A scale of nurses' stress to nursing work was developed to embrace a wide range of nurses' psychological responses to nursing work based on the theoretical model.

While the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic is ongoing, monkeypox has been rapidly spreading in non-endemic countries since May 2022. Accurate and rapid laboratory tests are essential for identifying and controlling monkeypox. Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine and the Korea Disease Prevention and Control Agency have proposed guidelines for diagnosing monkeypox in clinical laboratories in Korea. These guidelines cover the type of tests, selection of specimens, collection of specimens, diagnostic methods, interpretation of test results, and biosafety. Molecular tests are recommended as confirmatory tests. Skin lesion specimens are recommended for testing in the symptomatic stage, and the collection of both blood and oropharyngeal swabs is recommended in the presymptomatic or prodromal stage.

Economic evaluations in the healthcare are used to assess economic efficiency of pharmaceuticals and medical interventions such as diagnoses and medical procedures. This study introduces the main concepts of economic evaluation across its key steps: planning, outcome and cost calculation, modeling, cost-effectiveness results, uncertainty analysis, and decision-making. When planning an economic evaluation, we determine the study population, intervention, comparators, perspectives, time horizon, discount rates, and type of economic evaluation. In healthcare economic evaluations, outcomes include changes in mortality, the survival rate, life years, and quality-adjusted life years, while costs include medical, non-medical, and productivity costs. Model-based economic evaluations, including decision tree and Markov models, are mainly used to calculate the total costs and total effects. In cost-effectiveness or costutility analyses, cost-effectiveness is evaluated using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, which is the additional cost per one additional unit of effectiveness gained by an intervention compared with a comparator. All outcomes have uncertainties owing to limited evidence, diverse methodologies, and unexplained variation. Thus, researchers should review these uncertainties and confirm their robustness. We hope to contribute to the establishment and dissemination of economic evaluation methodologies that reflect Korean clinical and research environment and ultimately improve the rationality of healthcare policies.

Objectives: To conduct a comparative study of children’s health in South Korea versus North Korea focusing on air pollution. Methods: We used annual mortality rate, prevalence, and environmental indicators data from the World Bank and World Health Organizations (WHO). Trend analysis of the two Koreas was conducted to evaluate changes in health status over time. Spearman’s correlation analysis was used to find out the correlation between environmental indicators and children’s health status. Results: We found a distinct gap in children’s health status between the two Koreas. While North Korea reported a higher death rate of children than South Korea, both showed a decreasing trend with the gap narrowing from 2000 to 2017. The prevalence of overweight and obesity increased and that of thinness decreased in both Koreas. Except PM2.5 exposure, South Korea reported higher figures in most indicators of air pollutant emissions (South Korea, mean (SD)=28.3 (2.0); North Korea, mean (SD)=36.5 (2.8), P-value=0.002). Conclusion This study empirically discovered the gaps and patterns of children’s health between South Korea and North Korea. North Korean children experienced more severe health outcomes than children in South Korea. These findings imply that epigenetic modification caused by environmental stressors affect children’s health in the two Koreas despite similar genetic characteristics. Considering the gaps in children’s health between the two Koreas, more attention and resources need to be directed towards North Korea because the necessary commodities and services to improve children’s health are lacking in North Korea.

Purpose: The current study investigated how clinical microbiology courses are conducted at the undergraduate nursing level in South Korea to identify the perceptions of clinical nurses regarding their knowledge and the clinical importance of microbiology and further assess their educational needs. Methods: Curricula presented on the websites of 202 undergraduate nursing institutions were reviewed. In addition, a survey assessing the knowledge and importance of clinical microbiology perceived by nurses was conducted online. A total of 150 nurses participated in the survey. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlation coefficients, t-tests, analysis of variance, Borich Needs Assessment Model, and Locus for Focus Model. Results: The results indicated that 90% of undergraduate nursing institutions offer clinical microbiology courses under various subject names. The perceived knowledge and importance of clinical microbiology were correlated; however, knowledge was consistently lower than the perceived importance of clinical biology among nurses. The structure and proliferation of novel viruses ranked highest in the educational needs of nurses based on both the Borich Needs Assessment Model and Locus for Focus Model. Conclusion Based on the findings, this study suggests educational opportunities for clinical microbiology in hospital settings to reduce discrepancies between knowledge and the importance of clinical microbiology faced by nurses.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the actual situation of mask wearing by adults in the early stages of the coronavirus epidemic and to identify factors that influence the transition to mask wearing and establish a management plan for more effective infectious disease prevention. Methods: This study was a multinational study conducted in ten countries. Data collected in Korea were analyzed. Adults over the age of 18 in the Seoul and Gyeonggi areas were targeted, and data for 657 adults were analyzed. Results: The average score for mask-wearing compliance was 16.25, ranging from 0 to 24. There was a significant positive correlation between anxiety and depression, as well as anxiety and mask-wearing compliance. There was a significant negative correlation between depression and mask-wearing compliance. Multiple linear regression revealed that mask-wearing compliance was predicted by levels of the anxiety, depression, and education. These explanatory variables explaining the dependent variable mask-wearing compliance was 12%. Conclusion To identify and improve factors influencing mask-wearing compliance, general characteristics including educational background of participants were identified. Psychosocial factors such as anxiety and depression should also be considered. In addition, as the level of anxiety and depression will differ for each person, differentiated interventions according to psychological state should be provided.