This study evaluated the feasibility of implementing a value-based, community-centered primary care model in South Korea by focusing on the Anseong Health Welfare Social Cooperative (Anseong Medicoop) as a case study. Anseong Medicoop restructured its existing NaHaengSi (“time for caring for oneself”) program into a community-centered healthcare model and provides services to 1,517 participants. This healthcare model categorized participants into two groups: disease prevention and chronic disease management. Service provision encompassed five stages: registration and categorization, initial examination, comprehensive assessment and planning, service delivery, and monitoring and evaluation. By emphasizing comprehensive community-centered activities, preventive services, and appropriate medical treatments, Anseong Medicoop possesses a robust foundation for the effective implementation of this model. The high levels of satisfaction observed in service evaluations provide further evidence of its success. Anseong Medicoop’s healthcare model demonstrated the feasibility of a community-centered primary care approach in South Korea. This study highlights the potential for the successful implementation of a value-based, community-centered primary care model in South Korea if operational challenges are sufficiently addressed and a new payment system is introduced.

This study evaluated the feasibility of implementing a value-based, community-centered primary care model in South Korea by focusing on the Anseong Health Welfare Social Cooperative (Anseong Medicoop) as a case study. Anseong Medicoop restructured its existing NaHaengSi (“time for caring for oneself”) program into a community-centered healthcare model and provides services to 1,517 participants. This healthcare model categorized participants into two groups: disease prevention and chronic disease management. Service provision encompassed five stages: registration and categorization, initial examination, comprehensive assessment and planning, service delivery, and monitoring and evaluation. By emphasizing comprehensive community-centered activities, preventive services, and appropriate medical treatments, Anseong Medicoop possesses a robust foundation for the effective implementation of this model. The high levels of satisfaction observed in service evaluations provide further evidence of its success. Anseong Medicoop’s healthcare model demonstrated the feasibility of a community-centered primary care approach in South Korea. This study highlights the potential for the successful implementation of a value-based, community-centered primary care model in South Korea if operational challenges are sufficiently addressed and a new payment system is introduced.

This study evaluated the feasibility of implementing a value-based, community-centered primary care model in South Korea by focusing on the Anseong Health Welfare Social Cooperative (Anseong Medicoop) as a case study. Anseong Medicoop restructured its existing NaHaengSi (“time for caring for oneself”) program into a community-centered healthcare model and provides services to 1,517 participants. This healthcare model categorized participants into two groups: disease prevention and chronic disease management. Service provision encompassed five stages: registration and categorization, initial examination, comprehensive assessment and planning, service delivery, and monitoring and evaluation. By emphasizing comprehensive community-centered activities, preventive services, and appropriate medical treatments, Anseong Medicoop possesses a robust foundation for the effective implementation of this model. The high levels of satisfaction observed in service evaluations provide further evidence of its success. Anseong Medicoop’s healthcare model demonstrated the feasibility of a community-centered primary care approach in South Korea. This study highlights the potential for the successful implementation of a value-based, community-centered primary care model in South Korea if operational challenges are sufficiently addressed and a new payment system is introduced.

This study evaluated the feasibility of implementing a value-based, community-centered primary care model in South Korea by focusing on the Anseong Health Welfare Social Cooperative (Anseong Medicoop) as a case study. Anseong Medicoop restructured its existing NaHaengSi (“time for caring for oneself”) program into a community-centered healthcare model and provides services to 1,517 participants. This healthcare model categorized participants into two groups: disease prevention and chronic disease management. Service provision encompassed five stages: registration and categorization, initial examination, comprehensive assessment and planning, service delivery, and monitoring and evaluation. By emphasizing comprehensive community-centered activities, preventive services, and appropriate medical treatments, Anseong Medicoop possesses a robust foundation for the effective implementation of this model. The high levels of satisfaction observed in service evaluations provide further evidence of its success. Anseong Medicoop’s healthcare model demonstrated the feasibility of a community-centered primary care approach in South Korea. This study highlights the potential for the successful implementation of a value-based, community-centered primary care model in South Korea if operational challenges are sufficiently addressed and a new payment system is introduced.

While the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic is ongoing, monkeypox has been rapidly spreading in non-endemic countries since May 2022. Accurate and rapid laboratory tests are essential for identifying and controlling monkeypox. Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine and the Korea Disease Prevention and Control Agency have proposed guidelines for diagnosing monkeypox in clinical laboratories in Korea. These guidelines cover the type of tests, selection of specimens, collection of specimens, diagnostic methods, interpretation of test results, and biosafety. Molecular tests are recommended as confirmatory tests. Skin lesion specimens are recommended for testing in the symptomatic stage, and the collection of both blood and oropharyngeal swabs is recommended in the presymptomatic or prodromal stage.

Background: This study aimed to perform meta-analyses to update a previous systematic review (SR) conducted by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) to evaluate the benefits and harms of screening for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in asymptomatic adults. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and regional databases were searched from their inception to January 2020. Studies for diagnostic accuracy, preventive services effect, treatment efficacy, and treatment harms were included. Results: Eighteen studies were included, and twelve of these were newly added in this update. In meta-analyses, the pooled sensitivity and specificity for COPD diagnosis using spirometry were 73.4% and 89.0%, respectively. The relative effect of smoking cessation intervention with screening spirometry, presented as abstinence rate, was not statistically significant (risk ratio [RR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87–1.67) when all selected studies were pooled, but screening on smoking cessation was effective (RR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.14–2.19) when limited to studies with smoking cessation programs that provided smoking cessation medicines or intensive counseling at public health centers or medical institutions. Conclusion In this study, no direct evidence for the impact on health outcomes of screening asymptomatic adults for COPD was identified similar to the previous SR. Further research is necessary to confirm the benefits of COPD screening.

Economic evaluations in the healthcare are used to assess economic efficiency of pharmaceuticals and medical interventions such as diagnoses and medical procedures. This study introduces the main concepts of economic evaluation across its key steps: planning, outcome and cost calculation, modeling, cost-effectiveness results, uncertainty analysis, and decision-making. When planning an economic evaluation, we determine the study population, intervention, comparators, perspectives, time horizon, discount rates, and type of economic evaluation. In healthcare economic evaluations, outcomes include changes in mortality, the survival rate, life years, and quality-adjusted life years, while costs include medical, non-medical, and productivity costs. Model-based economic evaluations, including decision tree and Markov models, are mainly used to calculate the total costs and total effects. In cost-effectiveness or costutility analyses, cost-effectiveness is evaluated using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, which is the additional cost per one additional unit of effectiveness gained by an intervention compared with a comparator. All outcomes have uncertainties owing to limited evidence, diverse methodologies, and unexplained variation. Thus, researchers should review these uncertainties and confirm their robustness. We hope to contribute to the establishment and dissemination of economic evaluation methodologies that reflect Korean clinical and research environment and ultimately improve the rationality of healthcare policies.

Objectives: To conduct a comparative study of children’s health in South Korea versus North Korea focusing on air pollution. Methods: We used annual mortality rate, prevalence, and environmental indicators data from the World Bank and World Health Organizations (WHO). Trend analysis of the two Koreas was conducted to evaluate changes in health status over time. Spearman’s correlation analysis was used to find out the correlation between environmental indicators and children’s health status. Results: We found a distinct gap in children’s health status between the two Koreas. While North Korea reported a higher death rate of children than South Korea, both showed a decreasing trend with the gap narrowing from 2000 to 2017. The prevalence of overweight and obesity increased and that of thinness decreased in both Koreas. Except PM2.5 exposure, South Korea reported higher figures in most indicators of air pollutant emissions (South Korea, mean (SD)=28.3 (2.0); North Korea, mean (SD)=36.5 (2.8), P-value=0.002). Conclusion This study empirically discovered the gaps and patterns of children’s health between South Korea and North Korea. North Korean children experienced more severe health outcomes than children in South Korea. These findings imply that epigenetic modification caused by environmental stressors affect children’s health in the two Koreas despite similar genetic characteristics. Considering the gaps in children’s health between the two Koreas, more attention and resources need to be directed towards North Korea because the necessary commodities and services to improve children’s health are lacking in North Korea.

Antigens, Nuclear ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid ; Autoantibodies ; Diagnosis ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay ; Fluorescence ; Humans ; Immunoenzyme Techniques ; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic ; Rheumatic Diseases ; Sensitivity and Specificity

BACKGROUND: The interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) releasing assay (IGRA) is widely used for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) diagnosis. We evaluated the analytical performance of a new automated chemiluminescent immunoanalyzer-based IGRA (CLIA-IGRA), AdvanSure I3 (LG Life Sciences, Seoul, Korea) and compared it with that of the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) assay. METHODS: Repeatability and reproducibility were evaluated at four levels. Detection capability, including limit of blank (LoB), limit of detection (LoD), and limit of quantification (LoQ), was evaluated using IFN-γ standard material (National Institute for Biological Standards and Control code: 87/586). Agreement between the results of two assays was evaluated using 341 blood samples from healthcare workers and patients at a tertiary care hospital. To determine the cut-off value of CLIA-IGRA for diagnosing LTBI, the ROC curve was analyzed. RESULTS: Repeatability and reproducibility were 4.86–7.00% and 6.36–7.88% CV, respectively. LoB, LoD, and LoQ were 0.022, 0.077, and 0.249 IU/mL, respectively. IFN-γ values between CLIA-IGRA and QFT-GIT showed a strong correlation within the analytical measurable range of both assays, especially when the value was low. Qualitative comparison of the two assays yielded a 99.1% overall agreement (kappa coefficient=0.98). A cut-off value of 0.35 IU/mL was appropriate for diagnosing LTBI. CONCLUSIONS CLIA-IGRA is a reliable assay for LTBI diagnosis, with performance similar to that of QFT-GIT.