Intramural hematoma of the gastrointestinal tract is a rare disease entity. Pancreatitis-induced intramural gastric hematoma (IGH) is far more seldom reported. Here, we report a rare case of a giant IGH occurring as a delayed complication of pancreatitis in a 51-year-old man. The diagnosis was made using computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic ultrasonography. The patient was conservatively managed, and follow-up abdominal CT showed marked decreases in the size of the IGH.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether early CT scans are useful for improving the clinical management of acute biliary pancreatitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 56 consecutive patients who experienced first attack of acute pancreatitis and underwent CT scans within 48 hours of symptom onset in the emergency department, between March 2015 and March 2016. CT images were retrospectively evaluated for absence or presence, and etiology of acute pancreatitis, and probability of biliary pancreatitis. Urgent procedures for acute pancreatitis were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 56 patients, 54 (96.4%) showed acute pancreatitis and 23 (41.1%) had biliary pancreatitis on CT. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of CT-diagnosed biliary pancreatitis were 94.6% (53/56), 91.7% (22/24), and 96.9% (31/32), respectively. Of the 56 patients, 17 (30.4%) patients with biliary pancreatitis underwent urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) within 72 hours (mean time interval between CT and ERCP: 25.5 ± 19.8 hours; range: 2–67 hours). There was a significant difference in the urgent procedures between non-biliary and biliary pancreatitis groups (0 of 32 vs. 17 of 24, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Early CT may be used in patients visiting hospital with suspected acute biliary pancreatitis to facilitate urgent treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the image quality of low-tube-voltage and low-iodine-concentration-contrast-medium (LVLC) computed tomography urography (CTU) with iterative reconstruction (IR) with that of conventional CTU. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, multi-institutional, randomized controlled trial was performed at 16 hospitals using CT scanners from various vendors. Patients were randomly assigned to the following groups: 1) the LVLC-CTU (80 kVp and 240 mgI/mL) with IR group and 2) the conventional CTU (120 kVp and 350 mgI/mL) with filtered-back projection group. The overall diagnostic acceptability, sharpness, and noise were assessed. Additionally, the mean attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and figure of merit (FOM) in the urinary tract were evaluated. RESULTS: The study included 299 patients (LVLC-CTU group: 150 patients; conventional CTU group: 149 patients). The LVLC-CTU group had a significantly lower effective radiation dose (5.73 ± 4.04 vs. 8.43 ± 4.38 mSv) compared to the conventional CTU group. LVLC-CTU showed at least standard diagnostic acceptability (score ≥ 3), but it was non-inferior when compared to conventional CTU. The mean attenuation value, mean SNR, CNR, and FOM in all pre-defined segments of the urinary tract were significantly higher in the LVLC-CTU group than in the conventional CTU group. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic acceptability and quantitative image quality of LVLC-CTU with IR are not inferior to those of conventional CTU. Additionally, LVLC-CTU with IR is beneficial because both radiation exposure and total iodine load are reduced.
Commerce ; Contrast Media* ; Humans ; Iodine ; Noise ; Prospective Studies ; Radiation Exposure ; Signal-To-Noise Ratio ; Urinary Tract ; Urography*