Background and Objectives: The purpose of this study is to investigate the vocal development in toddlers with simultaneous bilateral cochlear implants (bilateral CI group) and to compare their progress to that of chronological age-matched (CA group) and hearing agematched (HA group) toddlers who have normal hearing and typical development.Subjects and Method Thirteen toddlers who received bilateral CIs simultaneously before 18 months of age participated in this study. Twenty-six toddlers participated as the control groups (CA group and HA group). The spontaneous utterances were collected from each toddler during free play with their parents in the laboratory. A total of 2324 spontaneous utterances of 39 toddlers (13 toddlers in each of the three groups) were classified as either canonical vocalizations or noncanonical vocalizations. Results: The bilateral CI group produced significantly fewer canonical vocalizations than the CA group. However, there was not a significant difference in the ratio of canonical vocalizations between the CI and the CA groups. There were no significant differences in the frequency and ratio of canonical vocalization between the CI and HA groups. In the CI group, the frequency of canonical and noncanonical vocalizations was significantly correlated with receptive and expressive language scores. Conclusion The findings of this study showed that toddlers with bilateral CIs make good advancements in vocal development compared to toddlers with normal hearing. However, toddlers with bilateral CIs seem to produce an insufficient quantity of canonical vocalizations compared to age-matched hearing toddlers. Information about vocal development following simultaneous bilateral CI helps speech therapists and parents recognize speech development before the use of intelligible speech in communication.

Background and Objectives: The purpose of this study is to investigate the vocal development in toddlers with simultaneous bilateral cochlear implants (bilateral CI group) and to compare their progress to that of chronological age-matched (CA group) and hearing agematched (HA group) toddlers who have normal hearing and typical development.Subjects and Method Thirteen toddlers who received bilateral CIs simultaneously before 18 months of age participated in this study. Twenty-six toddlers participated as the control groups (CA group and HA group). The spontaneous utterances were collected from each toddler during free play with their parents in the laboratory. A total of 2324 spontaneous utterances of 39 toddlers (13 toddlers in each of the three groups) were classified as either canonical vocalizations or noncanonical vocalizations. Results: The bilateral CI group produced significantly fewer canonical vocalizations than the CA group. However, there was not a significant difference in the ratio of canonical vocalizations between the CI and the CA groups. There were no significant differences in the frequency and ratio of canonical vocalization between the CI and HA groups. In the CI group, the frequency of canonical and noncanonical vocalizations was significantly correlated with receptive and expressive language scores. Conclusion The findings of this study showed that toddlers with bilateral CIs make good advancements in vocal development compared to toddlers with normal hearing. However, toddlers with bilateral CIs seem to produce an insufficient quantity of canonical vocalizations compared to age-matched hearing toddlers. Information about vocal development following simultaneous bilateral CI helps speech therapists and parents recognize speech development before the use of intelligible speech in communication.

Background and Objectives: The purpose of this study is to investigate the vocal development in toddlers with simultaneous bilateral cochlear implants (bilateral CI group) and to compare their progress to that of chronological age-matched (CA group) and hearing agematched (HA group) toddlers who have normal hearing and typical development.Subjects and Method Thirteen toddlers who received bilateral CIs simultaneously before 18 months of age participated in this study. Twenty-six toddlers participated as the control groups (CA group and HA group). The spontaneous utterances were collected from each toddler during free play with their parents in the laboratory. A total of 2324 spontaneous utterances of 39 toddlers (13 toddlers in each of the three groups) were classified as either canonical vocalizations or noncanonical vocalizations. Results: The bilateral CI group produced significantly fewer canonical vocalizations than the CA group. However, there was not a significant difference in the ratio of canonical vocalizations between the CI and the CA groups. There were no significant differences in the frequency and ratio of canonical vocalization between the CI and HA groups. In the CI group, the frequency of canonical and noncanonical vocalizations was significantly correlated with receptive and expressive language scores. Conclusion The findings of this study showed that toddlers with bilateral CIs make good advancements in vocal development compared to toddlers with normal hearing. However, toddlers with bilateral CIs seem to produce an insufficient quantity of canonical vocalizations compared to age-matched hearing toddlers. Information about vocal development following simultaneous bilateral CI helps speech therapists and parents recognize speech development before the use of intelligible speech in communication.

Background and Objectives: The purpose of this study is to investigate the vocal development in toddlers with simultaneous bilateral cochlear implants (bilateral CI group) and to compare their progress to that of chronological age-matched (CA group) and hearing agematched (HA group) toddlers who have normal hearing and typical development.Subjects and Method Thirteen toddlers who received bilateral CIs simultaneously before 18 months of age participated in this study. Twenty-six toddlers participated as the control groups (CA group and HA group). The spontaneous utterances were collected from each toddler during free play with their parents in the laboratory. A total of 2324 spontaneous utterances of 39 toddlers (13 toddlers in each of the three groups) were classified as either canonical vocalizations or noncanonical vocalizations. Results: The bilateral CI group produced significantly fewer canonical vocalizations than the CA group. However, there was not a significant difference in the ratio of canonical vocalizations between the CI and the CA groups. There were no significant differences in the frequency and ratio of canonical vocalization between the CI and HA groups. In the CI group, the frequency of canonical and noncanonical vocalizations was significantly correlated with receptive and expressive language scores. Conclusion The findings of this study showed that toddlers with bilateral CIs make good advancements in vocal development compared to toddlers with normal hearing. However, toddlers with bilateral CIs seem to produce an insufficient quantity of canonical vocalizations compared to age-matched hearing toddlers. Information about vocal development following simultaneous bilateral CI helps speech therapists and parents recognize speech development before the use of intelligible speech in communication.

Background and Objectives: The purpose of this study is to investigate the vocal development in toddlers with simultaneous bilateral cochlear implants (bilateral CI group) and to compare their progress to that of chronological age-matched (CA group) and hearing agematched (HA group) toddlers who have normal hearing and typical development.Subjects and Method Thirteen toddlers who received bilateral CIs simultaneously before 18 months of age participated in this study. Twenty-six toddlers participated as the control groups (CA group and HA group). The spontaneous utterances were collected from each toddler during free play with their parents in the laboratory. A total of 2324 spontaneous utterances of 39 toddlers (13 toddlers in each of the three groups) were classified as either canonical vocalizations or noncanonical vocalizations. Results: The bilateral CI group produced significantly fewer canonical vocalizations than the CA group. However, there was not a significant difference in the ratio of canonical vocalizations between the CI and the CA groups. There were no significant differences in the frequency and ratio of canonical vocalization between the CI and HA groups. In the CI group, the frequency of canonical and noncanonical vocalizations was significantly correlated with receptive and expressive language scores. Conclusion The findings of this study showed that toddlers with bilateral CIs make good advancements in vocal development compared to toddlers with normal hearing. However, toddlers with bilateral CIs seem to produce an insufficient quantity of canonical vocalizations compared to age-matched hearing toddlers. Information about vocal development following simultaneous bilateral CI helps speech therapists and parents recognize speech development before the use of intelligible speech in communication.

Purpose: This study investigated pathological complete response (pCR) according to androgen receptor (AR) in breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and estimated the relationship between AR expression and clinicopathological factors. Materials and Methods: We identified 624 breast cancer patients who underwent surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy at the National Cancer Center in Goyang, Korea from April 2016 to October 2019. We retrospectively collected the clinicopathologic information and AR expression results and analyzed the data according to cancer stage, hormonal receptor (HR) status, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status, tumor subtype, and pCR. Results: Among the 624 breast cancer patients, 529 (84.8%) were AR-positive (AR+) patients and 95 (15.2%) were AR-negative (AR–) patients. AR+ patients showed more estrogen receptor (ER) positivity, progesterone receptor (PR) positivity, HER2-positivity, and HR-positive and HER2-negative (HR+/HER2–) subtype. The rate of pCR was 31.4% (196/624). AR– patients had a significantly higher rate of pCR than AR+ patients (AR– 43.2% vs. AR+ 29.3%, p=0.007). The tumor factors associated with pCR were early stage, histologic grade 3, ER-negative, PR-negative, AR-negative, HER2-positive, and high Ki-67 values. In univariable analysis, AR+ significantly decreased the state of pCR (odds ratio, 0.546; 95% confidence interval, 0.349 to 0.853; p=0.008). According to tumor subtype, AR– tumor showed higher pCR rate in HR+/HER2– subtype (AR– 28.6% vs. AR+ 7.3%, p=0.022). Conclusion AR expression is predominant in the HR+/HER2– subtype. AR– is significantly associated with the pCR rate in breast cancer patients, especially within HR+/HER2– subtype. When determining neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the HR+/HER2– subtype, AR expression can be considered as a pCR predictive marker.

During the 2019 domestic measles outbreak in Korea, measles occurred in healthcare workers with two doses of the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine, and the strict application of the Occupational Safety and Health Act required medical institutions to identify healthcare workers' immunity to measles and vaccinate the susceptible pockets. In response to the frontline medical institutions' request to review the measles recommendations and guidelines, the Korean Society of Infectious Diseases held a roundtable discussion on the causes of measles outbreak, timing of vaccinations, antibody tests, and booster vaccinations for healthcare workers, and financial support from the government and municipality as well as response strategies against the outbreak in healthcare settings. In Korea, the seroprevalence of measles is decreasing in the vaccine-induced immunity group during the maintenance of measles elimination over several years. The susceptible group against measles is in their 20s and 30s, and this may be because of waning immunity rather than nonresponse considering Korea's vaccine policy. The risk of measles nosocomial infection from community increases as these susceptible pockets actively engage in medical institutions.Thus, data on the immunity of low seroprevalence group in Korea are needed, further discussion is needed on the booster vaccination based on the data. Especially, antibody testing and vaccination in healthcare workers may be necessary to prevent the spread of measles in medical insutitutions, and further discussion is needed regarding specific testing methods, and the timing and frequency of test and vaccination.

Given the recent advances in management and understanding of breast cancer, a standardized pathology report reflecting these changes is critical. To meet this need, the Breast Pathology Study Group of the Korean Society of Pathologists has developed a standardized pathology reporting format for breast cancer, consisting of ‘standard data elements,’ ‘conditional data elements,’ and a biomarker report form. The ‘standard data elements’ consist of the basic pathologic features used for prognostication, while other factors related to prognosis or diagnosis are described in the ‘conditional data elements.’ In addition to standard data elements, all recommended issues are also presented. We expect that this standardized pathology report for breast cancer will improve diagnostic concordance and communication between pathologists and clinicians, as well as between pathologists inter-institutionally.

Given the recent advances in management and understanding of breast cancer, a standardized pathology report reflecting these changes is critical. To meet this need, the Breast Pathology Study Group of the Korean Society of Pathologists has developed a standardized pathology reporting format for breast cancer, consisting of ‘standard data elements,’ ‘conditional data elements,’ and a biomarker report form. The ‘standard data elements’ consist of the basic pathologic features used for prognostication, while other factors related to prognosis or diagnosis are described in the ‘conditional data elements.’ In addition to standard data elements, all recommended issues are also presented. We expect that this standardized pathology report for breast cancer will improve diagnostic concordance and communication between pathologists and clinicians, as well as between pathologists inter-institutionally.

During the 2019 domestic measles outbreak in Korea, measles occurred in healthcare workers with two doses of the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine, and the strict application of the Occupational Safety and Health Act required medical institutions to identify healthcare workers' immunity to measles and vaccinate the susceptible pockets. In response to the frontline medical institutions' request to review the measles recommendations and guidelines, the Korean Society of Infectious Diseases held a roundtable discussion on the causes of measles outbreak, timing of vaccinations, antibody tests, and booster vaccinations for healthcare workers, and financial support from the government and municipality as well as response strategies against the outbreak in healthcare settings. In Korea, the seroprevalence of measles is decreasing in the vaccine-induced immunity group during the maintenance of measles elimination over several years. The susceptible group against measles is in their 20s and 30s, and this may be because of waning immunity rather than nonresponse considering Korea's vaccine policy. The risk of measles nosocomial infection from community increases as these susceptible pockets actively engage in medical institutions.Thus, data on the immunity of low seroprevalence group in Korea are needed, further discussion is needed on the booster vaccination based on the data. Especially, antibody testing and vaccination in healthcare workers may be necessary to prevent the spread of measles in medical insutitutions, and further discussion is needed regarding specific testing methods, and the timing and frequency of test and vaccination.