1.Effects of the Adversity Quotient on Turnover Intention of New Nurses in General Hospitals: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Reality Shock
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration 2020;26(5):457-467
Purpose:
This study was done to identify the effect of adversity quotient and reality shock on the turnover intention among new nurses in general hospitals.
Methods:
Participants were 158 new nurses in general hospitals. A survey was used and data were collected in April 2019. Data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS/WIN 22.0 program.
Results:
The significant predictors for the turnover intention of new nurses were training status (β=.38), age (β=.19) and reality shock (β=.51). These variables explained 46.3% of the variance in turnover intention of nurses. Also, reality shock had a total mediating effect on the relationship between adversity quotient and turnover intention.
Conclusion
Findings indicate that adversity quotient and reality shock are important factors for turnover intention of new nurses in general hospitals.
2.Association of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring with renal outcome in patients with chronic kidney disease
Hyung Eun SON ; Ji Young RYU ; Suryeong GO ; Youngjin YI ; Kipyo KIM ; Yoon Kyu OH ; Kook-Hwan OH ; Ho Jun CHIN
Kidney Research and Clinical Practice 2020;39(1):70-80
Background:
The significance of ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) in Korean patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in relation to renal outcome or death remains unclear. We investigated the role of ABP in predicting end-stage renal disease or death in patients with CKD.
Methods:
We enrolled 387 patients with hypertension and CKD who underwent ABP monitoring and were followed for 1 year. Data on clinical parameters and outcomes from August 2014 to May 2018 were retrospectively collected. The composite endpoint was end-stage renal disease or death. Patients were grouped according to the mean ABP.
Results:
There were 66 endpoint events, 52 end-stage renal disease cases, and 15 mortalities. Among all patients, one developed end-stage renal disease and died. Mean ABP in the systolic and diastolic phases were risk factors for the development of composite outcome with hazard ratios of 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.04; P < 0.001) and 1.04 (95% CI, 1.02-1.07; P = 0.001) for every 1 mmHg increase in BP, respectively. Patients with mean ABP between 125/75 and 130/80 mmHg had a 2.56-fold higher risk for the development of composite outcome (95% CI, 0.72-9.12; P = 0.147) as compared to those with mean ABP ≤ 125/75 mmHg. Patients with mean ABP ≥ 130/80 mmHg had a 4.79-fold higher risk (95% CI, 1.68-13.70; P = 0.003) compared to those with mean ABP ≤ 125/75 mmHg. Office blood pressure (OBP) was not a risk factor for the composite outcome when adjusted for covariates.
Conclusion
In contrast to OBP, ABP was a significant risk factor for end-stage renal disease or death in CKD patients.