1.Adverse impact of metabolic dysfunction on fibrosis regression following direct-acting antiviral therapy: A multicenter study for chronic hepatitis C
Tom RYU ; Young CHANG ; Soung Won JEONG ; Jeong-Ju YOO ; Sae Hwan LEE ; Sang Gyune KIM ; Young Seok KIM ; Hong Soo KIM ; Seung Up KIM ; Jae Young JANG
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology 2025;31(2):548-562
Background/Aims:
Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) effectively eradicate hepatitis C virus. This study investigated whether metabolic dysfunction influences the likelihood of fibrosis regression after DAA treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC).
Methods:
This multicenter, retrospective study included 8,819 patients diagnosed with CHC who were treated with DAAs and achieved a sustained virological response (SVR) between January 2014 and December 2022. Fibrosis regression was defined as a 20% reduction in noninvasive surrogates for liver fibrosis, such as liver stiffness (LS) measured by vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) and the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score. Hypercholesterolemia (h-TC) was defined as >200 mg/dL.
Results:
The median age of the study population was 59.6 years, with a predominance of male patients (n=4,713, 57.3%). Genotypes 1, 2, and others were confirmed in 3,872 (46.2%), 3,487 (41.6%), and 1,024 (12.2%) patients, respectively. Diabetes mellitus (DM) was present in 1,442 (17.2%) patients and the median LS was 7.50 kPa (interquartile range, 5.30–12.50). Multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of DM and pre-DAA h-TC were independently associated with a decreased probability of fibrosis regression by VCTE. Additionally, pre-DAA h-TC was independently associated with a decreased probability of fibrosis regression by the FIB-4.
Conclusions
Metabolic dysfunction has an unfavorable influence on fibrosis regression in patients with CHC who achieve SVR after DAA treatment.
2.The Role of Knowledge and Personal Experience in Shaping Stigma Associated With COVID-19 and Mental Illness
Ji-Min YOO ; Ju-Wan KIM ; Seon-Young KIM ; Seunghyong RYU ; Ju-Yeon LEE ; Sook-In JUNG ; Jae-Min KIM ; Sung-Wan KIM
Psychiatry Investigation 2025;22(1):110-116
Objective:
Stigma influences perceptions of mental illness and novel diseases like coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), often impeding healthcare access despite advancements in medical treatment. This study compares the stigma associated with COVID-19 and mental illness to identify factors that could help reduce stigma.
Methods:
An online survey was conducted in May 2023 among 1,500 participants aged 19 to 65 in South Korea, using a panel from Embrain, an online survey service. The survey assessed stigma and distress related to COVID-19 and mental illness using a validated questionnaire. It collected demographic and clinical data, evaluated COVID-19-related stigma, fear, and knowledge, and measured prejudice and attitudes toward psychiatric treatment. Personality traits were assessed using the Big Five Inventory (BFI)-10. Factors significantly associated with stigma scores were entered into linear regression analysis.
Results:
COVID-19-related stigma scores were significantly negatively correlated with knowledge of COVID-19 and positively correlated with fear of infection and age. Individuals with a history of COVID-19 infection had significantly lower scores on COVID-19-related stigma. Similarly, mental illness stigma was negatively correlated with knowledge of psychiatric treatment and positively correlated with age, as well as conscientiousness and neuroticism in the BFI. Personal experience with individuals with mental illness was associated with significantly lower stigma scores.
Conclusion
This study suggests that the mechanism-making stigma was similar in cases of traditional mental illness and a novel infectious disease. Both cognitive and experiential factors influence stigma. Educating the public about the disease and enabling interactions with affected individuals emerge as effective strategies for stigma reduction.
3.Adverse impact of metabolic dysfunction on fibrosis regression following direct-acting antiviral therapy: A multicenter study for chronic hepatitis C
Tom RYU ; Young CHANG ; Soung Won JEONG ; Jeong-Ju YOO ; Sae Hwan LEE ; Sang Gyune KIM ; Young Seok KIM ; Hong Soo KIM ; Seung Up KIM ; Jae Young JANG
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology 2025;31(2):548-562
Background/Aims:
Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) effectively eradicate hepatitis C virus. This study investigated whether metabolic dysfunction influences the likelihood of fibrosis regression after DAA treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC).
Methods:
This multicenter, retrospective study included 8,819 patients diagnosed with CHC who were treated with DAAs and achieved a sustained virological response (SVR) between January 2014 and December 2022. Fibrosis regression was defined as a 20% reduction in noninvasive surrogates for liver fibrosis, such as liver stiffness (LS) measured by vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) and the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score. Hypercholesterolemia (h-TC) was defined as >200 mg/dL.
Results:
The median age of the study population was 59.6 years, with a predominance of male patients (n=4,713, 57.3%). Genotypes 1, 2, and others were confirmed in 3,872 (46.2%), 3,487 (41.6%), and 1,024 (12.2%) patients, respectively. Diabetes mellitus (DM) was present in 1,442 (17.2%) patients and the median LS was 7.50 kPa (interquartile range, 5.30–12.50). Multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of DM and pre-DAA h-TC were independently associated with a decreased probability of fibrosis regression by VCTE. Additionally, pre-DAA h-TC was independently associated with a decreased probability of fibrosis regression by the FIB-4.
Conclusions
Metabolic dysfunction has an unfavorable influence on fibrosis regression in patients with CHC who achieve SVR after DAA treatment.
4.Effects of Pressure Hemostasis Band Application on Bleeding, Pain, and Discomfort after Bone Marrow Examination
Jin Hee JUNG ; Bo-Eun KIM ; Ji Sook JU ; Mi RYU ; So Young CHOE ; Jong Hee CHOI ; Soo-Mee BANG ; Jeong-Ok LEE ; Ji Yun LEE ; Sang-A KIM
Asian Oncology Nursing 2025;25(1):17-27
Purpose:
The purpose of this study was to develop an approach to alleviate the discomfort caused by sandbag compression after a bone marrow examination. This research examined the effects of applying a pressure hemostasis band on bleeding, pain, and discomfort at the bone marrow examination site.
Methods:
This study was conducted with a nonequivalent control group non-synchronized design. For 74 patients under evaluation who underwent bone marrow examination, sandbag compression was applied to the examination site in the control group (n=37), and a pressure hemostasis band was applied to the intervention group (n=37). In both groups, absolute bed rest was performed for two hours, and bleeding, pain, and discomfort at the examination site were measured.
Results:
After two hours of the bone marrow examination, there was no difference in bleeding on the gauze between the two groups (F=0.59, p=.444). Bleeding occurred in three patients in the intervention group and six in the control group (χ 2 =1.14, p=.479), with no cases of hematoma detected in either group. One hour post-examination, the control group experienced significantly higher pain (F=5.45, p=.022) and discomfort (F=5.68, p=.020) than the intervention group. However, pain and discomfort levels were similar between groups after two hours.
Conclusion
Compared to the sandbag compression group, the band application group showed no difference in bleeding and experienced less pain and discomfort at the examination site. This confirms that the pressure hemostasis band is a suitable alternative to sandbag compression in post-examination care.
5.The Role of Knowledge and Personal Experience in Shaping Stigma Associated With COVID-19 and Mental Illness
Ji-Min YOO ; Ju-Wan KIM ; Seon-Young KIM ; Seunghyong RYU ; Ju-Yeon LEE ; Sook-In JUNG ; Jae-Min KIM ; Sung-Wan KIM
Psychiatry Investigation 2025;22(1):110-116
Objective:
Stigma influences perceptions of mental illness and novel diseases like coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), often impeding healthcare access despite advancements in medical treatment. This study compares the stigma associated with COVID-19 and mental illness to identify factors that could help reduce stigma.
Methods:
An online survey was conducted in May 2023 among 1,500 participants aged 19 to 65 in South Korea, using a panel from Embrain, an online survey service. The survey assessed stigma and distress related to COVID-19 and mental illness using a validated questionnaire. It collected demographic and clinical data, evaluated COVID-19-related stigma, fear, and knowledge, and measured prejudice and attitudes toward psychiatric treatment. Personality traits were assessed using the Big Five Inventory (BFI)-10. Factors significantly associated with stigma scores were entered into linear regression analysis.
Results:
COVID-19-related stigma scores were significantly negatively correlated with knowledge of COVID-19 and positively correlated with fear of infection and age. Individuals with a history of COVID-19 infection had significantly lower scores on COVID-19-related stigma. Similarly, mental illness stigma was negatively correlated with knowledge of psychiatric treatment and positively correlated with age, as well as conscientiousness and neuroticism in the BFI. Personal experience with individuals with mental illness was associated with significantly lower stigma scores.
Conclusion
This study suggests that the mechanism-making stigma was similar in cases of traditional mental illness and a novel infectious disease. Both cognitive and experiential factors influence stigma. Educating the public about the disease and enabling interactions with affected individuals emerge as effective strategies for stigma reduction.
6.The Role of Knowledge and Personal Experience in Shaping Stigma Associated With COVID-19 and Mental Illness
Ji-Min YOO ; Ju-Wan KIM ; Seon-Young KIM ; Seunghyong RYU ; Ju-Yeon LEE ; Sook-In JUNG ; Jae-Min KIM ; Sung-Wan KIM
Psychiatry Investigation 2025;22(1):110-116
Objective:
Stigma influences perceptions of mental illness and novel diseases like coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), often impeding healthcare access despite advancements in medical treatment. This study compares the stigma associated with COVID-19 and mental illness to identify factors that could help reduce stigma.
Methods:
An online survey was conducted in May 2023 among 1,500 participants aged 19 to 65 in South Korea, using a panel from Embrain, an online survey service. The survey assessed stigma and distress related to COVID-19 and mental illness using a validated questionnaire. It collected demographic and clinical data, evaluated COVID-19-related stigma, fear, and knowledge, and measured prejudice and attitudes toward psychiatric treatment. Personality traits were assessed using the Big Five Inventory (BFI)-10. Factors significantly associated with stigma scores were entered into linear regression analysis.
Results:
COVID-19-related stigma scores were significantly negatively correlated with knowledge of COVID-19 and positively correlated with fear of infection and age. Individuals with a history of COVID-19 infection had significantly lower scores on COVID-19-related stigma. Similarly, mental illness stigma was negatively correlated with knowledge of psychiatric treatment and positively correlated with age, as well as conscientiousness and neuroticism in the BFI. Personal experience with individuals with mental illness was associated with significantly lower stigma scores.
Conclusion
This study suggests that the mechanism-making stigma was similar in cases of traditional mental illness and a novel infectious disease. Both cognitive and experiential factors influence stigma. Educating the public about the disease and enabling interactions with affected individuals emerge as effective strategies for stigma reduction.
7.The Role of Knowledge and Personal Experience in Shaping Stigma Associated With COVID-19 and Mental Illness
Ji-Min YOO ; Ju-Wan KIM ; Seon-Young KIM ; Seunghyong RYU ; Ju-Yeon LEE ; Sook-In JUNG ; Jae-Min KIM ; Sung-Wan KIM
Psychiatry Investigation 2025;22(1):110-116
Objective:
Stigma influences perceptions of mental illness and novel diseases like coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), often impeding healthcare access despite advancements in medical treatment. This study compares the stigma associated with COVID-19 and mental illness to identify factors that could help reduce stigma.
Methods:
An online survey was conducted in May 2023 among 1,500 participants aged 19 to 65 in South Korea, using a panel from Embrain, an online survey service. The survey assessed stigma and distress related to COVID-19 and mental illness using a validated questionnaire. It collected demographic and clinical data, evaluated COVID-19-related stigma, fear, and knowledge, and measured prejudice and attitudes toward psychiatric treatment. Personality traits were assessed using the Big Five Inventory (BFI)-10. Factors significantly associated with stigma scores were entered into linear regression analysis.
Results:
COVID-19-related stigma scores were significantly negatively correlated with knowledge of COVID-19 and positively correlated with fear of infection and age. Individuals with a history of COVID-19 infection had significantly lower scores on COVID-19-related stigma. Similarly, mental illness stigma was negatively correlated with knowledge of psychiatric treatment and positively correlated with age, as well as conscientiousness and neuroticism in the BFI. Personal experience with individuals with mental illness was associated with significantly lower stigma scores.
Conclusion
This study suggests that the mechanism-making stigma was similar in cases of traditional mental illness and a novel infectious disease. Both cognitive and experiential factors influence stigma. Educating the public about the disease and enabling interactions with affected individuals emerge as effective strategies for stigma reduction.
8.Effects of Pressure Hemostasis Band Application on Bleeding, Pain, and Discomfort after Bone Marrow Examination
Jin Hee JUNG ; Bo-Eun KIM ; Ji Sook JU ; Mi RYU ; So Young CHOE ; Jong Hee CHOI ; Soo-Mee BANG ; Jeong-Ok LEE ; Ji Yun LEE ; Sang-A KIM
Asian Oncology Nursing 2025;25(1):17-27
Purpose:
The purpose of this study was to develop an approach to alleviate the discomfort caused by sandbag compression after a bone marrow examination. This research examined the effects of applying a pressure hemostasis band on bleeding, pain, and discomfort at the bone marrow examination site.
Methods:
This study was conducted with a nonequivalent control group non-synchronized design. For 74 patients under evaluation who underwent bone marrow examination, sandbag compression was applied to the examination site in the control group (n=37), and a pressure hemostasis band was applied to the intervention group (n=37). In both groups, absolute bed rest was performed for two hours, and bleeding, pain, and discomfort at the examination site were measured.
Results:
After two hours of the bone marrow examination, there was no difference in bleeding on the gauze between the two groups (F=0.59, p=.444). Bleeding occurred in three patients in the intervention group and six in the control group (χ 2 =1.14, p=.479), with no cases of hematoma detected in either group. One hour post-examination, the control group experienced significantly higher pain (F=5.45, p=.022) and discomfort (F=5.68, p=.020) than the intervention group. However, pain and discomfort levels were similar between groups after two hours.
Conclusion
Compared to the sandbag compression group, the band application group showed no difference in bleeding and experienced less pain and discomfort at the examination site. This confirms that the pressure hemostasis band is a suitable alternative to sandbag compression in post-examination care.
9.Effects of Pressure Hemostasis Band Application on Bleeding, Pain, and Discomfort after Bone Marrow Examination
Jin Hee JUNG ; Bo-Eun KIM ; Ji Sook JU ; Mi RYU ; So Young CHOE ; Jong Hee CHOI ; Soo-Mee BANG ; Jeong-Ok LEE ; Ji Yun LEE ; Sang-A KIM
Asian Oncology Nursing 2025;25(1):17-27
Purpose:
The purpose of this study was to develop an approach to alleviate the discomfort caused by sandbag compression after a bone marrow examination. This research examined the effects of applying a pressure hemostasis band on bleeding, pain, and discomfort at the bone marrow examination site.
Methods:
This study was conducted with a nonequivalent control group non-synchronized design. For 74 patients under evaluation who underwent bone marrow examination, sandbag compression was applied to the examination site in the control group (n=37), and a pressure hemostasis band was applied to the intervention group (n=37). In both groups, absolute bed rest was performed for two hours, and bleeding, pain, and discomfort at the examination site were measured.
Results:
After two hours of the bone marrow examination, there was no difference in bleeding on the gauze between the two groups (F=0.59, p=.444). Bleeding occurred in three patients in the intervention group and six in the control group (χ 2 =1.14, p=.479), with no cases of hematoma detected in either group. One hour post-examination, the control group experienced significantly higher pain (F=5.45, p=.022) and discomfort (F=5.68, p=.020) than the intervention group. However, pain and discomfort levels were similar between groups after two hours.
Conclusion
Compared to the sandbag compression group, the band application group showed no difference in bleeding and experienced less pain and discomfort at the examination site. This confirms that the pressure hemostasis band is a suitable alternative to sandbag compression in post-examination care.
10.Adverse impact of metabolic dysfunction on fibrosis regression following direct-acting antiviral therapy: A multicenter study for chronic hepatitis C
Tom RYU ; Young CHANG ; Soung Won JEONG ; Jeong-Ju YOO ; Sae Hwan LEE ; Sang Gyune KIM ; Young Seok KIM ; Hong Soo KIM ; Seung Up KIM ; Jae Young JANG
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology 2025;31(2):548-562
Background/Aims:
Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) effectively eradicate hepatitis C virus. This study investigated whether metabolic dysfunction influences the likelihood of fibrosis regression after DAA treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC).
Methods:
This multicenter, retrospective study included 8,819 patients diagnosed with CHC who were treated with DAAs and achieved a sustained virological response (SVR) between January 2014 and December 2022. Fibrosis regression was defined as a 20% reduction in noninvasive surrogates for liver fibrosis, such as liver stiffness (LS) measured by vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) and the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score. Hypercholesterolemia (h-TC) was defined as >200 mg/dL.
Results:
The median age of the study population was 59.6 years, with a predominance of male patients (n=4,713, 57.3%). Genotypes 1, 2, and others were confirmed in 3,872 (46.2%), 3,487 (41.6%), and 1,024 (12.2%) patients, respectively. Diabetes mellitus (DM) was present in 1,442 (17.2%) patients and the median LS was 7.50 kPa (interquartile range, 5.30–12.50). Multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of DM and pre-DAA h-TC were independently associated with a decreased probability of fibrosis regression by VCTE. Additionally, pre-DAA h-TC was independently associated with a decreased probability of fibrosis regression by the FIB-4.
Conclusions
Metabolic dysfunction has an unfavorable influence on fibrosis regression in patients with CHC who achieve SVR after DAA treatment.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail