The goal of palliative care is to soothe or relieve the patients with serious illness of their suffering and to improve the quality of their life. It integrates the physical, psychological, social and spiritual aspects of patient care into a comprehensive whole. Doctors and other medical workers talk with the patients by providing appropriate information and explanations and care should be carried out according to the patients' wishes. The care team should confirm their wishes at every opportunity since the patients' wishes can change with time. The presenters who were actually involved in medical care or nursing care discussed how to solve the problems of palliative care and end-of-life care.
End ; Life ; Palliative Care ; Community ; Doctors

The mortality rate in Japan due to life-threatening illnesses is predicted to increase rapidly. Delivering appropriate care for people with terminal illness is an important, but largely neglected, role of the health care system in many countries. Recently, the concept of “Primary Palliative Care” has been proposed internationally, and is commonly used as a generic term regarding the activities of primary care physicians and home care nursing services. The tasks of primary palliative care include : 1) caring for people with life-threatening illnesses ; 2) contributing a palliative care approach early in the disease process ; 3) embracing all dimensions of care, including physical, psychological, social, and spiritual ; and 4) providing end-of-life care in the community. By building a system of primary palliative care that is consistent with our nation's medical system and values, care that meets the individual and familys' needs can be provided in the primary care setting which will further enable us to contribute to the community.

Background: In order to improve physicians' competence of palliative care, the PEACE project, a palliative care education program for physicians based on the Cancer Control Act, has been conducted throughout the country since 2008. The effectiveness and limitations of the current project management techniques and learning materials have not been determined. This study aimed to explore current problems with the PEACE project and to seek corrective strategies. Method: A workshop was held with 36 participants who had finished PEACE faculty-development programs, and involved brain-storming with physicians. The results of brain-storming sessions were qualitatively analyzed. Results: Most problems identified related to the burden, to the host, of holding the faculty-development program workshop. In addition, some problems related specifically to the individual host site or community involved. Conclusion: One strategy to improve these problems is to incorporate e-Learning to both expand the program and reduce the burden on the host site. In addition, workshop materials could be improved to include additional modules and revised guidelines. Palliat Care Res 2011; 6(2): 143-149

Purpose: The Palliative Care Education Program based on the Cancer Control Act has been held throughout Japan since 2008. The aim of this study is to identify changes attained through the program from the trainers' perspective. Method: The contents of the brain-storming sessions with the twelve trainers were qualitatively analyzed. Results: Six main categories of improvement were identified. These include: Reinforced cooperation; improved palliative care skills and knowledge; improved awareness of palliative care; improved understanding of the local palliative care resources; behavior modification of the participants; and development of in-hospital palliative care systems. Conclusion: Trainers recognized that holding the Palliative Care Education Program provides not only direct results such as greater knowledge and improved delivery of palliative care by physicians, but also indirect results such as enhanced cooperation and improved awareness of local palliative care resources.

Objectives：To clarify effectiveness of educational workshop in advance care planning (ACP) and clinical ethics based on education for implementing end-of-life discussion (E-FIELD) program. Methods：Pre-post questionnaire survey. We held workshop in ACP and clinical ethics based on E-FIELD program. We measured participant’s knowledge of ACP and difficulties of End-of-Life (EOL) discussion before and after the workshop. Results：In 37 participants, 34 participants finished the course. Improvement of knowledge of ACP and clinical ethics in post workshop survey was statistically significant (pre. 18.1 v.s. post 23.9, p<0.001, paired t test). In terms of difficulties of EOL discussion, 7 items in all 13 items questionnaire were improved significantly in post workshop survey (p<0.05, Wilcoxon rank sum test). Conclusion：Educational workshop in ACP and clinical ethics based on E-FIELD program may improve knowledge of ACP and reduce difficulties of EOL discussion.

Purpose: To investigate the job satisfaction, burnout, and related factors associated with palliative care-certified nurses. Methods: In 2005, we performed a mail-based questionnaire survey on palliative care-certified nurses was performed using job-satisfaction and Burnout Inventory. Related factors such as working place and clinical experience were also asked. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to investigate relationship between burnout and the factors. Results: Of the 171 questionnaires delivered, 137 were returned (81.1%). The means of the job satisfaction subscales were as follows, professional status: 32.6±6.5, interaction: 26.4±6.7, autonomy: 17.5±5.2, doctor-nurse relationship: 8.6±3.6, administration: 28.5±8.5, pay: 24.0±7.8, task requirement: 13.2±5.4, and mean total, 150.6±29.8. Seventy palliative care-certified nurses (51%) showed signs of burnout. On the basis of multivariate logistic regression analysis, 9 factors, including those related to respondents working in cancer hospitals (odds ratio : 34.67, 95% confidence interval : 2.90-414.29) were observed to be associated with burnout. Conclusion: In order to facilitate the activities of palliative care-certified nurses, it might be useful to provide them with workplace-specific training and support. Palliat Care Res 2010; 5(1): 127-136

Background：A palliative care education program based on the Cancer Control Act, namely the Palliative care Emphasis Program on symptom management and Assessment for Continuous medical Education（PEACE）, has been run in Japan since 2008. Purpose：The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of PEACE for clinicalpractice. Method：Focus group interviews were conducted with 12 physicians who attended the program and were chosen by theoretical sampling. Two investigators independently performed thematic content analysis. Results：Qualitative analysis identified five main categories of usefulness of the program：（1）acquiring knowledge of palliative care；（2）acquiring skills to provide palliative care；（3）mastering an attitude of focusing on suffering；（4）acquiring knowledge about home palliative care；and（5）standardizing knowledge of basic palliative care in the community. Three main categories for program improvement were identified, namely the content and structure of the program, as well as the method of running the program. Conclusion：PEACE may be useful in providing systematic education in basic palliative care through the acquisition of basic knowledge and skills, discussion of cases with colleagues, observing good communication by other physicians, and networking in the community.

Aims: The aim of this study was to clarify practical use of feedback report in each institution participated the nationwide bereavement survey (J-HOPE3). Methods: After a nationwide bereavement survey (J-HOPE3) conducted in 2014, we sent a feedback report to each participated institution (20 general wards, 133 inpatient palliative care units, and 22 home hospice services). The feedback report included the results from quality of care, bereaved family’s mental status, and free comments from the participant of their own institution. We sent a questionnaire 4 month following to the feedback report for all institutions regarding the practical use of results from the feedback report. Results: The analysis included 129 (response rate 74%) returned questionnaires. The institutions that they passed around the report was 90%, discussed about their results at a staff meeting was 54%, and reported the results to manager/chief of the institution was 65%. Around 80% of the institutions responded positively to receive the feedback report of their own institution such as “It was good that they could understand the strengths and weakness of their own institutions” which reported that they worked on to improve care were 48%. Conclusions: Current study had shown data about practical use of the feedback report of bereavement study. It is important to feedback the results and encourage the institution to make use of the results in their daily practice, especially to discuss the results in staff meetings.

Previous study reported that patients of institutions with religious background are more likely to achieve ‘good death’ than patients in non-religious institutions, although the reasons are unclear. This study aims to examine the reasons for this difference using a national survey of religious and non-religious institutions. We sent a self-administered questionnaire to 10,715 bereaved family caregiver and 133 hospice and palliative care units which cared for their family members prior to death. The questionnaire for bereaved families included the Good Death Inventory (GDI). The questionnaire for institutions included their religious affiliation and their subjective and objective provided care. In total, 7,286 bereaved families (68%) and 127 (95%) institutions including 23 religious end-of-life care institutions responded. We performed t-test and χ-square test to compare the GDI scores and provided care for religious and non-religious end-of-life care institutions. The GDI total score was significantly higher (p=0.01) in religious institutions compared to non-religious institutions. Items such as “providing many activities for seasonal events to the patients”, “providing more bereavement care”, “having facilities to practice their religion”, and “having regular visits from religious leaders”, were all reported more frequently in the religious institutions, and significantly associated with achievement of ‘good death’ (p<0.05 for all items). This study suggests that factors for achieving ‘good death’ are not only limited to providing religious care but also providing other forms of care, services, and activities that can enhance the patients’ ‘good death’.