The decision of which surgical approach to use for the treatment of a multifocal craniofacial abscess is still a controversial matter. A failure to control disease progress in the craniofacial region can potentially put the patient's life at risk. Therefore, understanding the various ways to approach the craniofacial region helps surgeons to obtain satisfactory results in such cases. In this report, we describe a patient who visited the emergency department with a large swelling in his right cheek. A blood test and computed tomography revealed odontogenic maxillary sinusitis. The patient developed sepsis due to a progressive multifocal abscess. An abscess was seen in the temporal muscle, infratemporal fossa, and interorbital region. To control this multifocal abscess, we used the facial dismasking flap (FDF) approach. After debridement using the FDF approach, we succeeded in obtaining sufficient drainage of the abscess, and the patient recovered from sepsis. The advantages of the FDF approach are that it provides a wide surgical field, extending from the parietal region to the mid-facial region, and that it leaves no aesthetically displeasing scars on the face. The FDF approach may be one of the best options to approach multifocal abscesses in the craniofacial region.
Abscess* ; Cheek ; Cicatrix ; Debridement ; Drainage ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Facial Bones ; Hematologic Tests ; Humans ; Maxillary Sinus ; Maxillary Sinusitis ; Orbit ; Parietal Lobe ; Sepsis ; Surgeons ; Temporal Muscle

A 17-year-old male was admitted to our hospital because of strong abdominal pain. His symptoms gradually worsened even after hospitalization, and contrast computed tomography (CT) revealed hemorrhage in the abdominal cavity. Interventional radiology (IVR) was performed to identify the bleeding site. No obvious source of bleeding was identifiable on IVR, so we opted to perform laparoscopic examination and hemostasis. The intraperitoneal finding was hematoma in the omentum, and omentectomy was performed for idiopathic omental hemorrhage because there was no history of trauma. The postoperative course was good and the patient was discharged after postoperative day 4. Performing laparoscopic surgery for omental hemorrhage facilitated minimally invasive treatment with a short hospital stay.

In our hospital, we typically perform laparoscopic partial gastrectomy as surgical treatment for extragastric growth type of submucosal tumor (SMT), and laparoscopic intragastric surgery for intragastric growth type. In 2008, laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) was reported for the first time by Hiki et al. Against the background of LECS as laparoscopic local gastric resection with endoscopic resection, we started LECS for gastric SMT from 2015. 　　We performed laparoscopic (LAP) surgery for 15 gastric SMT cases from 2009, and compared 5 cases for which LECS was performed and 10 cases for which LAP was performed. Tumor diameter was 15–21 mm (mean 19.2 mm) in the LECS group, and 20–53 mm (mean 35.5 mm) in the LAP group; the LECS group had a significantly smaller tumor diameter. Operative time was 299 ± 45 min in LECS and 222 ± 25 min in LAP. The volume of blood loss was 24 ± 13 mL in LECS and 33 ± 13 mL in LAP. Hospitalization days was 14.0 ± 3.0 days in LECS and 12.9 ±0.8 days in LAP. There was no significant difference between them.

A 70-year-old man with continuous diarrhea for over 1 month consulted a primary care doctor. He was treated with oral antibiotics and probiotics but his condition worsened. He developed generalized edema and was referred to our hospital. Abdominal ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) scan findings were suggestive of colon cancer with accompanying liver metastasis. Total colonoscopy and endoscopy for pathological diagnosis led to a diagnosis of cancer of the sigmoid colon accompanied with liver metastasis or liver abscess. We planned to perform sigmoidectomy with simultaneous resection of the liver lesion. However, we considered that he was not particularly fit to undergo two concurrent surgeries. Therefore, based on his physical condition, we planned to first do a sigmoidectomy. Before surgery, the fever persisted and a repeat CT scan showed deterioration of the liver lesion. We diagnosed the liver lesion as abscess and performed percutaneous transhepatic abscess drainage (PTAD). Three days after PTAD, we then performed sigmoidectomy. Subsequently, the liver abscess resolved and gradually disappeared. At 5 years after surgery, there has been no recurrence of the cancer or abscess.

We report here 2 cases of traumatic diaphragmatic hernia. Case 1 was a 76-year-old man who was injured in a road traffic accident (RTA). Chest X-ray and computed tomography (CT) revealed prolapse of the stomach into the left thoracic cavity. We performed laparotomy with a diagnosis of traumatic left diaphragmatic hernia. A 12-cm hole was seen in the central tendon of the left diaphragm and this was repaired by suturing. Case 2 was a 75-year-old man who was also injured in an RTA. Chest X-ray and CT revealed prolapse of the stomach and transverse colon into the left thoracic cavity. We performed laparotomy with a diagnosis of traumatic left diaphragmatic hernia. A 15-cm hole was seen in the central tendon of the left diaphragm and this was repaired by suturing. Traumatic diaphragmatic hernia is a relatively rare condition and one that requires surgical repair. It is important to make prompt diagnosis with appropriate radiological investigations. Additionally, patients with diaphragm hernia caused by blunt trauma often have injuries to other organs. Care should be taken so as not to miss associated injuries.

Simultaneous creation of an enterostomy for enteral nutrition during esophagectomy has been useful in our experience, but bowel obstruction associated with intestinal fistula remains a problem. Therefore, in this study, we retrospectively reviewed 18 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent transdiaphragmatic transgastric tube enteral feeding catheter placement during gastric tube reconstruction via the mediastinal route after esophagectomy from November 2012 to March 2014. The catheter was guided from the gastric tube into the gastrointestinal tract, with the tip placed in the jejunum distal to the ligament of Treitz. From the gastric tube, the catheter was guided along the diaphragm to the anterior abdominal wall through the extraperitoneal route. No bowel obstruction associated with catheter placement has been observed in any of the patients from the time of surgery to this writing. Also, the procedure enabled jejunostomy use for more than 5 years, similar to conventional jejunostomy. We experienced 1 case of catheter deviation into the mediastinum. Overall, transgastric tube enteral feeding catheter placement for reconstruction of the posterior mediastinal gastric tube was useful for avoiding intestinal obstruction associated with jejunostomy. However, there may be a risk of catheter displacement into the mediastinum.