Introduction: Recently, we reported on the effectiveness of short-term educational programs in clinic-based clinical clerkships that focus on medical care for elderly patients. To evaluate the need for providing a preliminary explanation of the medical care system and the medical equipment related to our programs, we assess the basic knowledge indispensable for all medical students for clinic-based training.
Methods: Before the training, we distributed a questionnaire related to our programs to medical students of Oita University who had participated in clinical clerkships.
Results: The analysis of the questionnaire data revealed that only 11.4% of the students knew the difference between the numbers of beds in a clinic and a hospital. In addition, 24.3% and 35.7% of the students did not know that vaccinations and medical examinations, respectively, are not approved for health insurance coverage in Japan. Of the students, 31.4% could not see the inappropriateness of addressing elderly female patients as “Grandma”. Furthermore, 28.1% of them did not know the sizes of needles and catheters, and only 18.6% of them knew the difference between a normal syringe and a catheter-tip syringe. In regard to the long-term care insurance system, 62.9% of them did not know of the concept of daily-life group care for elderly dementia patients.
Conclusion: These results suggest that preliminary explanations of the medical care system and the medical equipment related to our programs must be provided at the beginning of the training.

Abstract
Objective : We investigated the usefulness of providing medical students with demonstrations and education for commonly used medical devices focusing on medical and nursing care for the elderly. Educational materials were also distributed, in addition to the input from the participation of paramedic assistants as various strategies for providing instruction, prior to formal on-site practical training at our clinic.
Methods : Forty-two 5th year medical students undertook a questionnaire survey regarding the education provided prior to on-site practical training, and which was performed after training was completed at our clinic.
Results : All students responded that demonstrations of medical devices were “easy to understand”, while 81% responded that the distribution of materials was “necessary” and 97.6% responded that explanations from paramedics were either “important” or “necessary”. In addition, 95.2% reported that the explanations given prior to training “enhanced” their understanding of nursing care insurance facilities. In respect of medical procedures such as percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube management, while 97.6% of students reported that “the explanations given prior to practical training were adequate”, nevertheless 50% reported that “they still did not feel comfortable in actual practice even though the explanations given prior to training were adequate” .
Conclusion : The approaches used at our clinic for education given prior to on-site practical training, were considered beneficial for medical students. However, some of them did not feel comfortable performing medical procedures even though adequate explanations had been provided, indicating the need to create a program that promotes greater confidence in performing practical procedures among medical students in the future.

Introduction : To promote influenza prevention activities, we investigated the current status of prevention strategies for influenza among college students.
Methods : We handed out a questionnaire regarding prevention strategies for influenza to all students who visited at Oita University's Health Science Center for a medical checkup.
Results : Of the 2,752 students surveyed, 2,579 (93.7%) responded. Valid responses were obtained from 2,489 students (response rate 96.5%). Analysis of the questionnaire data revealed that the percentage of the students who received influenza vaccine was 21.0%. The proportion of the male students who received vaccine was significantly lower than that of female students (19.1% vs 23.7%). Regarding to the daily prevention habits, 71.7% of the students were able to carry out hand-washing, while less than half of the students carried out gargling, wearing a facemask and avoiding crowds. The proportion of the students who carried out daily prevention habits was significantly lower in non-vaccinated students than in vaccinated groups.
Conclusion : These results suggest that promotion of educational activities about prevention strategies for influenza at university is needed. Among them, promotion of vaccination for male students and daily prevention habits for non-vaccinated students are important.